One defence I’m seeing from Rubin Report fans is that the controversial guests who journalists bring up in critiques are from 2+ years ago. However, the guests aren’t the problem, and never were. Its Dave’s deceptive approach to interviewing. The reason critics talk about the Robinson, Cernovich and Molyneux interviews in particular is because they are particularly good examples that show how Dave’s softball questions and platitudes have the effect of depriving his audience of context and selling them false narratives