There is a lack of understanding, in the West, about the cost of the Empire’s approach to West Asia, or what is commonly known, for Eurocentrics, as the Middle East (a term that reflects the West’s imperial gaze). & so there is an urgent need to speak clearly about the long-term consequences of the Empire’s current policies toward West Asia. One of the least acknowledged realities in Western discourse is that the Empire, through all its actors, still treats this region not as an equal geopolitical actor, but as a space to be managed—still governed by the logic of colonial domination. 1/ The West continues to approach the region & its peoples with strategies more fitting to the 19th century: suppress what resists, reward what complies, & rely on regional instruments—precisely, “Israel”—to discipline both the States & movements that are seen as “threats.” The idea is not just to confront armed actors, but to dismantle the entire ecosystem of the Resistance. That includes political leaders & parties, academic & social institutions, religious voices, media networks, & independent governance models that operate outside Western/the Empire’s influence. & the underlying strategy is to prevent the emergence of alternative centres of power that question the legitimacy of occupation, foreign military presence, or enforced economic dependency. 2/

While many applaud the fact that October 7 was a “good start” given how people across the world “woke up” since then & began to realise the centrality of Palestine in global politics & the historic oppression of its people, I still refuse to see this as a “positive” outcome—for the following reasons: “Israel” was unleashed upon Palestine & the region as a whole—beginning with South Lebanon & Yemen—& now, with a bloody, existential war with Iran looming, all this supposed “realisation,” all these “protests,” all these theatrics, have proven to be, in fact, useless. That it took a massacre—a genocide, to be precise—for people to wake up was already absurd. But the fact that they still failed to learn the lesson of their inaction, passivity, & failure to rise to the level required over the past two years—that is beyond retribution. 1/ Today, the United States of America—the single most dangerous actor & power in the world—is openly threatening a sovereign nation not merely with war, but with extermination—because extermination is the new standard of warfare set by “Israel” in Gaza. & after all these years—decades—of remaining passive, of accepting US vetoes at the UN Security Council over absurd decisions, of accepting its rogue behaviour & its self-erected role of policeman, of tolerating “Israeli” crimes, of normalising its existence & its normalisation, & then of crying on social media over tens of thousands of Martyrs—still, as two rogue States prepare to wage war on the very existence of the one State that made it possible for us to resist “Israel” at all, the people of the world have learnt nothing. 2/

October 7 didn’t only change the battlefield, it shattered the illusion that clarity alone was enough. The Resistance acted. With full knowledge of the cost, they said: This ends now, or we end with it. That day wasn’t a message to “Israel” alone, it was a message to the world: No more begging for empathy. No more waiting for morality to kick in. It’s time to choose sides with action. But the vast majority never made that transition. In other words, the tests of moral clarity mattered before October 7. But after October 7, the only test that truly matters is the test of will. & most people are stuck in the earlier phase, in a sort of delayed reaction to decades of violence. That is why the vast majority in this world is falling short of the responsibility now. People still haven’t understood that we’ve moved from needing awareness to needing immense action. Since October 7, 2023, this is no longer a test of perspective. It’s a test of pressure. Who will raise the cost on the regimes enabling this? Who will raise the cost of embassies existing in their countries? Who will make complicity unbearable? Who will take risks proportionate—not to their feelings—but to the scale of the crime? People are not failing because they don’t understand, they are failing because they think understanding excuses them from doing more. & all of this is happening as social media continues to give the illusion of engagement while draining the substance of it. It’s been flooding with Gaza’s pain, keeping people emotionally overwhelmed, & then trapping them in cycles of sharing, scrolling, & reacting, almost ignoring the people who are demanding anything real from the rest of the world. [Bisan posted a video yesterday asking for her followers to be restless—their replies in her comments: “We shouted as loud as we could at a protest today!”] Social media & many personalities on it have convinced people that being “informed” or “heartbroken” is a form of resistance. & with the way Gaza is covered, people have become desensitised, not activated. They mistake exhaustion for powerlessness. They confuse visibility with impact. & worst of all, they begin to feel that witnessing is enough, that feeling deeply is doing their part. It’s built a loop: consume horror, express emotion, repeat—ignoring the voices that have been pushing people into disrupting the very system enabling the genocide they’re watching unfold. After all, these platforms are designed to keep people engaged, not mobilised.

March 29, 2025 — Highlights from Hizbullah SG Sheikh Naim Qassem’s speech (8:30 PM local time)

https://twitter.com/trhxianl/status/1898800073909104982

The speech has started.

Many Lebanese citizens remain abandoned in the illegitimate & illegal “Israeli” detention camps with no one in the Lebanese Government to help or protect them as they endure torture & violence away from their homes. They are held in horrifying conditions &, like their Palestinian comrades who have been sharing their medications with their Lebanese kin, are deprived of food & medical care despite many being wounded, suffering & in urgent need of treatment Many Lebanese were abducted by the IOF since December 19, during their incursions into several border villages. A few of them were released a few weeks ago, & have shared horrifying information about the conditions in which they & their Palestinian comrades were detained. The number of Resistance fighters held captive remains uncertain. The Enemy has acknowledged capturing 7 fighters, but sources confirmed to Al Akhbar that the actual number is higher, with fighters detained since the start of the ground invasion in early October.

Many in Lebanon—media figures, “journalists,” & citizens alike—speak of the “State” as if it is some omnipotent force, capable of action at the mere shake of a wand. They invoke it whenever they seek to assign blame for the country’s dire situation, but their fixation on the State is not rooted in reality. It is an abstraction that exists only in opposition to the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon. In their view, the State has authority, power, & the ability to act—only when it comes to confronting Hizbullah. It is a hollow & politically immature stance. The Lebanese State, since its very inception, has been incapable of asserting full sovereignty, securing its borders, or protecting its own people. It has always been dependent on external forces (& it will always be), & even in its strongest moments, it has only ever been able to do “half-things”—never fully delivering on security, justice, or governance. To suddenly believe that this same State can now enforce sweeping policies simply because the United States has given Nawaf Salam or Joseph Aoun a directive is nothing short of delusional.

There is a very ugly feeling I have been fighting & I wish I weren’t feeling it but it’s very present. & it is that the people of Jabal ‘Amel are isolated & alone—lives were sacrificed & changed forever so that Gaza would not be alone. & in return it seems like nobody in the region even remotely understands what is unfolding in Lebanon at the hands of “Israel” currently. & that is very ugly. There are mothers from our community who still are unable to fetch the remnants—if remnants there are—of their sons in some villages because “Israel” won’t withdraw, & “Israel” is trying to impose its dictate along with the United States. Now I never expect those inside Lebanon to understand because absolutely nothing in their narrative nor rhetoric gives any hope of them changing, really. But those outside, those who see US meddling, those who understand the righteousness of the fight that Hamas led, that the Resistance in the West Bank is leading—is it that hard to look at Lebanon & see the patterns, the oppression, the very dangerous outcome from this all for Palestine & for us as a people of this Homeland? “Israel” normalised the massacre of our people in Palestine as the world watched it & accepted it & justified it, on an hourly basis for over 15 months, & before that for over 75 years. There were crimes & cruelties committed daily, things that have personally kept me up for nights on end & completely shaped my & thousands of people’s childhood & entire lives. None of these went unnoticed by Hizbullah. Sayed Hassan Nasrallah since the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon’s inception from the very womb of Jabal ‘Amel spoke on every occasion to shed the light on Palestine. Incessantly, he told the world, including the Muslims & Arabs: look at Palestine, do something for our people there, act. We were met with radio silence. We fought “Israel.” We fought the US’s schemes inside Lebanon precisely because we could see that the outcome was, each time, the normalisation of “Israel.” Why would the United States want Lebanon to be at its command if not to turn it into another Jordan, another Egypt, with leaders who would fly to the White House & sit down like good puppies in front of the Emperor & accept the deals with a knife twisting right inside the Palestinian Struggle for Liberation?

Feb. 2nd, 2025 — Highlights from the speech of Hizbullah’s SG, Sheikh Naim Qassem on the latest developments in South Lebanon & Sayed Hassan Nasrallah’s funeral ceremony (6:30 PM local time)

https://twitter.com/trhxianl/status/1883866793372209493

Speech has started

Some quick thoughts. Since the “Israeli” aggression against Lebanon ended a few weeks ago, a new phrase has been circulating, serving as the cornerstone of many “analyses,” & repeated by many (even those who claim to be “pro-Resistance”) without anyone questioning why it is being treated as an absolute truth. The same pattern is now emerging with Gaza. The statement goes as follows: according to them, “Israel” has caused widespread destruction in Gaza & Lebanon in the past 15 months, & because of this, the Resistance in both Gaza & South Lebanon must now change how it perceives the Struggle against the Enemy. They claim the “form” of the war is now different & that military action can no longer be the method. Instead, they argue that we should stop trying to inflict damage on “Israel” & pursue diplomatic & political routes to achieve our goals. In other words, they are delegitimising the core of the Resistance, & attempting to hide their lack of belief in the Struggle itself. This narrative is misleading at best, & those who fail to see the Empire’s hand in shaping it are, frankly, fools. This shift in discourse seeks to undermine the core legitimacy of the Resistance, & it is a carefully crafted story that perfectly aligns with the Empire’s objective to neutralise effective Resistance under the guise of “pragmatism” & “peace-building.” There are several critical problems with it. First & foremost, it deliberately ignores the very nature & history of our struggle against “Israel.” The Resistance in Gaza & South Lebanon exists because the Enemy continues to occupy, oppress, & violate our people, our land, & our rights. The might & power of “Israel” & its enablers were never cause or reason enough for the Resistance to give up the weapons & seek other means—armed Resistance is politically, culturally, religiously, & historically embedded in our view of our Struggle . & our history with “Israel” is a history of destruction (by “Israel”), which is the very reason why the Resistance exists. So what has changed now? To suggest that we should now take a purely political path without addressing the structural violence inflicted by the very existence of “Israel” is to dismiss the reality of settler-colonialism, occupation, & US hegemony. It also legitimises the Empire’s framework—because whenever the push for diplomatic & political solutions occurs, it always happens within systems controlled by the very powers that are complicit in the oppression: who are the powers sponsoring the ceasefires & providing the “guarantees”? The same powers that protect “Israel” & frame armed Resistance as the problem, rather than as the most natural & logical response to the Western-backed Occupation in our Homeland.

THREAD: What happened in Lebanon today? After two years & two months of presidential vacancy in Lebanon, following a year of Support Front in South Lebanon & two months of cruel “Israeli” aggression, foreign powers led by the United States & France, alongside Arab States (Egypt, Qatar, & Saudi Arabia), collectively known as the Five-Membered Committee intervened under the pretext of “assisting” Lebanese politicians in electing a President. Their involvement initially aimed to resolve the political deadlock, which persisted due to the refusal of certain Lebanese factions to respond to repeated calls for dialogue to elect a President. For months, the Lebanese political blocs were unable to agree on a unified candidate. While Qatar did promote the election of Elias Bayssari prior to the war, Saudi Arabia remained largely silent before openly aligning with the United States in backing Joseph Aoun (the Lebanese Army Commander) this month (probably after the fall of Syria & Qatar’s influence there). Following sustained pressure from US Envoy Amos Hochstein & Saudi adviser Yazid bin Farhan, Joseph Aoun was presented as a so-called “consensual” candidate. However, his candidacy is anything but consensual for several reasons. For many in Lebanon, Joseph Aoun’s candidacy is fraught with significant concerns, despite the (deliberate) reluctance of numerous commentators to address them openly. Chief among these concerns are his close ties to the United States, which maintains substantial influence over the Lebanese Army through extensive political, financial, & logistical support. Joseph Aoun has long been regarded as a trusted ally of Washington, & his election is widely seen as advancing American interests. Compounding the controversy is the lack of political consensus around his nomination. Until just two days ago, Lebanon’s parliamentary blocs were sharply divided on any candidacy. Even Samir Geagea who is aligned with US policy in Lebanon, initially withheld his support for Joseph Aoun—not out of sovereignty-driven concerns, but because he harboured aspirations of being nominated himself. Over the weekend, Saudi envoy Yazid bin Farhan held meetings with various Lebanese factions, but the talks failed to produce a unified position. He returned yesterday with intensified pressure, particularly targeting Geagea & some Christian blocs, ultimately changing the political dynamics. Simultaneously, the US Ambassador to Lebanon was engaging in meetings with political blocs, notably excluding the Shia Duo (Hizbullah & Amal). France, which had initially backed Samir Assaf as its preferred candidate, shifted its position to align with the US & support Joseph Aoun. The French Ambassador’s remarks during a meeting with Lebanese political blocs exposed the overt nature of foreign interference, when he stated bluntly, “Joseph Aoun—1, 2, 3… 10” when asked by some MPs what were the alternatives. Adding to the disillusionment is the pervasive corruption that has plagued the electoral process. Reports indicate that parliamentary votes were bought for as much as $200,000 each, which illustrates the extent of both foreign meddling (& the transactional approach of the West in Lebanon) & domestic corruption in Parliament.
Finally, Joseph Aoun’s candidacy is also fraught with constitutional challenges. According to the Lebanese Constitution, his current position as a public servant renders him ineligible for the presidency unless he resigns & remains out of office for a designated period—a condition he has not fulfilled. This constitutional requirement has fuelled opposition to his nomination, notably from the Free Patriotic Movement, which has deemed his candidacy unconstitutional. Rejecting participation in the so-called consensus, they instead cast their votes under the banner of “Sovereignty & Constitution” (but the same bloc had previously extended its support to Elias Bayssari, whose candidacy also presented some challenges).

Dec. 14, 2024 — Live Highlights from the speech of Hizbullah’s SG, Sheikh Naim Qassem ⬇️

https://twitter.com/trhxianl/status/1864697607001399795

Sheikh Naim Qassem: I will start with an assessment of our current situation. The support front for Gaza was a noble & honourable act, one that was a duty upon us & a duty upon all Arabs. We had expected that the assault on Lebanon would begin, but we did not know the timing, & this expectation existed even before the Al Aqsa Flood operation & continued afterwards. The aggression began in September, & in reality, this is not connected to the Gaza Support Front but rather to the Enemy’s expansionist project, as the Enemy seeks to eliminate any Resistance that stands in the way of its expansionist agenda.

On Quds Day 2024, Sayed Hassan Nasrallah spoke the following words, which is why he was killed & why today’s “Nation of Islam” allowed for it to happen under their watch. There is so much wisdom in this precise sermon of Imam Ali (see the next tweet in this thread) that he explained to us. It is worth reflecting upon. He said: It is our duty to tell both the Enemy, who knows this already, & friends, who need assurance, as well as the petty: this Resistance in Lebanon does not fear war. We do not dread it. (...) I intended to read a passage from the speech of the Commander of the Faithful, Ali ibn Abi Talib, may peace be upon him. Bear with me for two or three minutes as I highlight the underlying principle. Everything we do is not for political gain. Our stance is Islamic, faithful, & prophetic. If Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, & Prophet Muhammad—peace be upon them all—along with all of God’s prophets & saints, were present today & asked about what is happening in Gaza, would they remain neutral? Indifferent? Would they say, “This is none of our business”? Sayed Hassan Nasrallah on Quds Day 2024: These are the days of the martyrdom anniversary of Imam Ali, peace be upon him. You know that in the aftermath of Siffin & Nahrawan, the situation had become dire, with Muawiya’s forces launching attacks on the outskirts of Iraq. This is from the famous Sermon of Jihad, which, when we were in school in Lebanon, was part of the Arabic literature curriculum. I am not sure if it still is today, but I vividly recall studying it back then. It begins: “As for after, verily Jihad is one of the doors of Paradise…” Now listen to what he says: “By Allah, no people were ever attacked in their own homes except that they were humiliated. You abandoned & failed one another until raids were launched against you, & your lands were seized.” (...) Here lies the crux, my brothers & sisters, the essence of true Islam—far removed from the likes of ISIS: “…that a man among them would enter the house of a Muslim woman or one under the protection of the Islamic State—a Christian or even a Jew. He would snatch her anklet, bracelet, necklace, & earrings. She could not defend herself except by saying: ‘We belong to Allah, & to Him we return,’ & seeking mercy. Then they would leave, triumphant, with no resistance, no bloodshed, & no harm inflicted upon them.” Now listen to what Ali ibn Abi Talib says, Muslims at large, & specifically, O Shia of Ali ibn Abi Talib: “If a Muslim were to die of grief after this, he would not be blamed but would be deserving in my eyes.”

I came across an interesting article analysing Sayed Hassan Nasrallah’s speeches throughout the war, with a primary focus on a potential ceasefire. I think it is insightful to read. Here is a translation.

• It is evident that the decision to crush the Resistance dates back, at the very least, to the war on Syria. That war was one fought by the Axis of Resistance to thwart a project broader in scope than the borders of Palestine. The “Al Aqsa Flood” operation was a preemptive strike against the Occupation forces after the decision to eliminate the Palestinian Resistance had already been made. Following the operation’s success, the Enemy swiftly carried out systematic ethnic cleansing & what might be the largest genocide in modern history.

Hizbullah did not know in advance that the Palestinian Resistance would carry out the “Al Aqsa Flood” operation. However, as a fundamental part of the Axis of Resistance & in commitment to its religious obligation to defend the oppressed Palestinian people, Hizbullah promptly decided to support the Palestinian Resistance by entering the battle under the banner of the “Support Front.” Based on the statements of the martyred Sayed, it can be deduced that Hizbullah had several objectives in this war, some broader than others, given that the war unfolded in two phases: the first when the Support Front was opened, & the second when the primary theatre of war shifted from Palestine to Lebanon. 1. Objectives

• Fulfilling the religious duty to support the oppressed Palestinian people as much as possible
The martyred Sayed said: “Knowledge must lead to bearing responsibility, supporting justice, & standing with the oppressed, suffering, & persecuted, of course within one’s capacity. God does not ask of people more than they can bear, which they assess based on priorities, circumstances, and facts. […] On Judgment Day, all the accountable, men & women, will be asked about Palestine, the region’s fronts, the consequences of this battle, their stance, their actions, & their behaviour—what they said, did, and offered.”

Two days later, he said: “We are not only responsible for ourselves & our families, but we are also responsible for the people. Within the limits of our capacity & energy, we took into account the national interests, supportive field actions, & pressure that influenced & affected the situation. We stayed within our capabilities, but had we failed to act, we would certainly have been held accountable on Judgment Day.”

• Preserving the Palestinian Resistance
There is no doubt that safeguarding the Palestinian Cause & defending the Palestinian people is contingent on preserving the Palestinian Resistance, as it is the foremost expression of rejection of Occupation & the primary defender of Palestinian rights in their historic struggle against the Zionist Enemy. The martyred Sayed emphasised this, saying: “We said in the early days that we must not allow the Resistance in Gaza to be defeated.”

• Alleviating pressure on Gaza by creating distractions & applying pressure
The martyred Sayed explained the nature of the “support” effort: “Through this continuous attrition and pressure, we can engage a significant portion of the Enemy’s forces & capabilities, preventing them from fully focusing on Gaza & concluding the battle there. We can pressure the Enemy, its army, & its society to understand that a ceasefire in the north is linked to a ceasefire in Gaza. If you want peace in the north, you must stop the aggression against Gaza.”

• Preserving the Islamic Resistance & defending Lebanon
The martyred Sayed, discussing the dimensions of the battle, warned that “the turn” after Gaza would be South Lebanon. He said: “This battle is not only for Palestine. It began for Palestine—that was the complete intention—but it is also for South Lebanon, for every grain of soil in South Lebanon, particularly south of the Litani.”

In another address, he clarified: “We set a second goal […], which was to prevent any preemptive action by the Enemy against Lebanon, as it had been contemplating such an action. On October 7, the Enemy was considering this, as later revealed in discussions within its government.”

He also stated: “Had Lebanon not joined this front, it would have borne much greater losses in the future if, God forbid, the Enemy had been victorious.”

• Thwarting normalisation plans & preventing the hegemonic powers from reshaping the region
The martyred Sayed explained that the success of the normalisation project hinged on closing the chapter of the Palestinian cause: “Palestine, which some Arab rulers were about to condemn to death by completing the final stages of normalisation with the ‘Israeli’ Enemy, was expected to happen within months. The goal was to bring Palestine back to the world’s consciousness, memory, & awareness—to return it to life, equations, battlefields, achievements, & the recovery of rights.”

He emphasised repeatedly that this battle determines the fate of Palestine, Lebanon, & the region on strategic, security, & national levels, far removed from narrow political calculations & interests.

This is a majorly important speech of Sayed Hassan, on Liberation Day (25 May) 2013, concerning Syria. I will translate this segment. Sayed Hassan Nasrallah: We now move on to the second issue, which is undoubtedly very sensitive and precise, & places us before an entirely new phase. What is happening in Syria, dear brothers & sisters, is of great importance to Lebanon & is also critical for Lebanon’s present & future. Let us not, as I said earlier, hide behind our fingers, bury our heads in the sand, or act as if the events in Syria are unfolding while we reside in Djibouti. No, we are right here on the border. With God’s grace, we possess the courage to speak & the courage to act. Therefore, today, let us speak with the required candour at this critical historical juncture. From the very beginning of the events, to quickly remind everyone, we in Hizbullah had a clear political stance. We said that the popular demands for reform were legitimate & acknowledged that this system had significant positive attributes, particularly regarding Resistance. At the same time, we also said it also had its flaws & shortcomings. What was needed was reform, & the path to reform was through political dialogue, not through anyone—whether the regime or the opposition—resorting to guns & bullets. Sayed Nasrallah: Since the first day, knowing Syria’s importance to Lebanon, the region, the Arab-“Israeli” war, Resistance movements, & the Palestinian Cause, we, despite our modest capabilities as a Party, used our substantial regional connections. I personally, alongside my brothers, engaged with President Bashar El Assad & other figures & entities within the opposition, aiming from the outset to reach political dialogue & a political settlement. I bear witness that President Assad was ready to engage, but the opposition refused. For those questioning the matter from a legal or jurisprudential perspective, the current Syrian leadership consistently expressed its willingness to sit at the negotiation table & reach a political settlement. It also accepted implementing fundamental reforms within the system. However, the opposition has consistently rejected dialogue from the beginning, hoping that the regime would collapse within a few months. They based their assumptions on an analysis, believing that those allied with the US, France, Britain, Italy, Germany, Europe, certain Arab oil States, Turkey, & others would inevitably triumph within a few months or even weeks. It was a miscalculation.

MP Hajj Muhammad Raad wrote: The Islamic Resistance is not, & has never been, closed off to its own convictions or unwilling to engage in dialogue with differing opinions, especially regarding sovereignty, national independence, & the national destiny. However, the Islamic Resistance, with all humility, confidence, & pride, & as an organisation with bitter experience confronting the Zionist Enemy, its combat doctrine, & the principles from which it derives its stances & projects, approaches matters of national sovereignty & destiny not merely based on the current national interest, despite its importance. Instead, it considers the broader framework of strategic national interests & legal and human principles & rights. This is because what aligns today with our immediate national interest may, after a short or extended period, conflict with that interest if strategic conditions change or the balance of power shifts in favour of our Enemy. Consequently, our assessment of the current national interest would also change. 1/ Moreover, the ongoing threat to our national sovereignty, security, & stability originates from an existential, expansionist Zionist Enemy with strategic & ideological ambitions in Lebanon—a fact well known to global thinkers, religious experts, & political & historical researchers. We are therefore obligated to frame issues related to our sovereignty & national security in a manner that strategically safeguards the country from the threats & existential dangers posed by the Zionist Enemy. Based on these two principles & all the aforementioned considerations, the Islamic Resistance is open to any proposal or formula that ensures at least a minimum commitment to these principles. Without such a commitment, Lebanon’s stability & sovereignty would be subject to the fluctuating interests or whims of the Zionist Enemy, dependent on its growing capabilities or effective alliances. 2/

It is infuriating that people have adopted “Israel’s” threats as “evacuation orders” & are now attempting to “prove” the horror of the Basta massacre by arguing that “Israel” didn’t issue such orders. This framing is not only deeply troubling but also dangerously normalises “Israel’s” aggression against Lebanon. It not only legitimises “Israel’s” actions but also erases the very context in which these threats occur: a vast genocidal campaign in the region, & a deliberate, systematic policy of terror against our people. Some thoughts. 1/ First of all, “Israel” doesn’t issue “evacuation orders,” it threatens—that is the correct term. Second, “Israel” has destroyed vast portions of Lebanon’s infrastructure without any prior notice, as such destruction is inherent to its very identity. Third, when “Israel” issues threats, it does not merely destroy the targeted building but systematically levels entire neighbourhoods. By treating these threats as “orders,” people unwittingly grant “Israel” the authority & moral high ground to dictate the lives of those under its aggression (our lives). This shifts the narrative from pointing at “Israel” as an aggressor committing war crimes to one where the victims are blamed for not “following orders.” & this framing erases the reality that “Israel’s” actions are not about safeguarding lives but asserting authority & inflicting maximum psychological, physical, & structural damage. 2/

Some thoughts on my mind. Many pro-Palestine figures, including Palestinians, see actions like the ICC issuing arrest warrants against Nitinyahu & Gallant as a culmination of their life’s work. This perspective stems from their upbringing in an era where international law & institutions were central to the framework for resolving the “Palestine Question.” For them, such actions represent a validation of a strategy rooted in faith in these systems. But the new generations (now in their 30s) should not grant these acts the same importance or legitimacy. We live in a different era, & have witnessed the undeniable collapse of the international order that previous generations placed their hopes in. Over the past year & a half, the West’s unwillingness to depart from imperial practices was exposed blatantly. If some refuse to acknowledge this shift, it falls on us to be the ones to bury the old system & its illusions. This criticism doesn’t stem merely from a place of
“hate,” or refusal to see some “positivity” in anything. I read someone who wrote that “today marks the day where Palestinians are no longer invisible” as if it is the (inherently imperial) international order that grants us existence & visibility (please don’t explain what he meant because I know). The ICC’s actions are not a sign of meaningful change but rather a symbolic gesture that aims to maintain the façade of justice while preserving the very structures that oppress the Palestinians (& Lebanese & so on). These institutions were never neutral arbiters but tools of the Empire, designed to enforce a global order that privileges colonial powers. Recognising this reality, we must redefine justice on our own terms. This means rejecting any reliance on institutions that have historically failed not only Palestine but the entire region, focusing instead on building frameworks of accountability that reflect our values & aspirations & most importantly our culture.

[A long thread about Hizbullah, Gaza, & the “end”] • Without requiring bloody massacres & before things escalated into genocide, Hizbullah was the only actor in the world that so swiftly, quickly, & surely achieved not only a solidarity that matters but a common destiny with Gaza on October 8, 2023. This alignment was not merely a rhetorical declaration or symbolic gesture, but a strategic & immediate commitment that demonstrated an unparalleled level of solidarity & action. Hizbullah transcended mere expressions of support—it tied its own fate to that of Gaza in a way that reflected both deep moral conviction & an acute understanding of the stakes involved for Palestine as a whole & thus the entire region. Hizbullah has done & continues to do everything within its power, defying all odds, pressure, & challenges that are far greater & more intricate than what is discussed or acknowledged, especially on social media, to stand against an Empire that is waging an “all-out” & unprecedented violent campaign on the region. What most fail to acknowledge (often out of bad faith) is that Hizbullah’s steadfastness is not merely a testament to its military & political capability, but also to the support & resilience of its constituency. While this constituency’s support for Hizbullah is an established reality (one that I do not believe, objectively, anything could ever weaken), their capacity to remain resolute under relentless violence & pressure is often dismissed & taken for granted. It is portrayed (when it is even acknowledged) by the so-called “pro-Palestine” world as a natural, almost inevitable thing, as though the extraordinary sacrifices & steadfastness of this community are normal & unremarkable. Meanwhile, the rest of the world, particularly Arab societies, sits idly by, offering little more than platitudes. This passive stance does not prevent many of them from making dismissive comments or passing judgment on the strategic decisions & actions of Hizbullah, political & military. Their critiques often betray an ignorance of the enormous price paid by Hizbullah’s community, but also Lebanon, & the lengths Hizbullah has gone to uphold its moral & strategic commitment to Palestine. This disparity underscores the hypocrisy & disconnection of much of the “pro-Palestine” discourse. It is easy for those removed from the direct line of fire to critique or debate the “opportunities” & “timing” of the Resistance. But the truth is that Hizbullah’s actions, & the concrete solidarity of its constituency with Gaza, represent a moral & practical standard that many claim to support but few genuinely embody. & it does not seem to prompt reflection or accountability from those who are quick to judge but unwilling (not unable) to act. Meanwhile, Hizbullah & its constituency have consistently done what is reasonably possible to stand by Gaza & resist the genocidal forces of a brutal Enemy that has not limited its genocide to Gaza but extended it to Lebanon, with a very clear intent to eradicate the Shia community (despite the fact that a very few want to acknowledge this reality) & inflicting immeasurable harm (again, nobody wonders how on Earth it is possible that Hizbullah’s supporters say “Praise be to God” in the face of their destroyed homes & shredded bodies). Hizbullah’s project is not about fleeting victories or momentary triumphs, but about a long-term, sustained effort to shield the entire region from US imperialism that enables “Israel” (& will reenable it) & is capable of making Gaza the new standard of violence in our region, everywhere.

Nov. 13, 2024 — (1) Hizbullah: In support of our people & Resistance in Gaza, & in defence of Lebanon & its people, at 5 AM, the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon targeted a gathering of “Israeli” Enemy forces east of the village of Maroun El Ras with a rocket barrage

https://twitter.com/trhxianl/status/1856356362663453107

(2) Hizbullah: In support of our people & Resistance in Gaza, & in defence of Lebanon & its people, at 12:05 PM, the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon’s Air Defence Units intercepted an “Israel” Hermes 450 drone in the skies over the central sector in South Lebanon with a surface-to-air missile, forcing it to leave Lebanese airspace

Nov. 9, 2024 — (1) Hizbullah: In support of our people & Resistance in Gaza, & in defence of Lebanon & its people, & as part of the Khaibar series of operations & in response to the attacks & massacres committed by the Zionist Enemy, & with the call “Labbayk ya Nasrallah,” the Islamic Resistance targeted the Haifa Technical Base (linked to the “Israeli” Air Force, containing an air force technician training college) in occupied Haifa with a qualitative rocket barrage (2) As part of the Khaibar operations, & in response to the Enemy’s aggressions & massacres, and with the call “Labbayk Ya Nasrallah,” the Islamic Resistance, for the first time, targeted the “Malem” military factory (involved in air & missile defence systems), located 132 km south of the Lebanese-Palestinian border, south of “Tel Aviv” with a qualitative rocket barrage

In my opinion, the most profound way to grasp the essence of Hizbullah, or the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon, is through Sayed Hassan Nasrallah’s speeches that he would deliver during Ashoura every year. These addresses would address the raison d’être of Hizbullah by revealing its core values & purpose for those who truly listen to his words with care & understanding. In one of his recent ones, in Ashoura of 2023, he explained how Karbala teaches us the virtues of patience & endurance, draws the path of confronting sieges & injustices, & urges us not to fall in the face of overwhelming odds & weaponry wielded by the Enemy... Sayed explained how it is Karbala that shapes the generations capable of paving the way for the Almighty’s Deliverance through Imam Al Mahdi, because it forges the very essence of those who will stand firmly with Sahib Al ‘Asr Wa’l Zaman (the Master of Age & Time), supporting him in his mission to establish justice, combat oppression, & create peace & security across the globe. He explained how this monumental task demands not just any generations, but generations of women & men of exceptional quality & resolve. The Shia believe that Imam Al Mahdi, or the Master of Age & Time, will reappear at the end of times to establish justice, eradicate oppression, & guide humanity to righteousness. But when will the end of times occur? This is what Sayed Nasrallah explained that day.