Nietzsche understood early that The Left was forming into a death cult after the loss of “religion”

Such a bizzare and unnatural hate for your child is a clear symptom of this

Death cults have formed all through history - there have been famous UFO suicide cults as recent as the 2000s

This happens because Mankind struggles with the question of why pain is part of Life

With no religion to explain why there is pain, they begin to hate Life

“To live is to suffer, to survive is to find meaning in the suffering” - Nietzsche

Cult form that conclude Life must be Evil and so they turn on everything seem as “natural” about Life:

- Your own baby is actually a parasite you must murder

- Nature gave you a penis as a sick joke and you must cut it off to define yourself

- Your instinctive love for your race is “hate” and you must denounce yourself

Death cults wound their adherents with shocking cruelty because of this Life hate

UFO suicide cults would often strangle each other in the final hours thinking they are about to escape this awful world

Gnostic death cults would follow the exact same pattern in ancient times and propose the entire world must be escaped and so kill each other

This is what “the woke mind virus” really is - a war against Life Why is “Life hate” not a mental illness, yet “racism” is?

Transgenderism was enforced through psychology

All of these derangements are entertained because psychology was built by Foucault, Butler, and Freud

Nietzsche’s psychology of the future could change everything…

Did Nietzsche Die of Syphilis?

- Brain disorder called CADASIL
- Causes blood vessels to burst in your 40s
- Neitzsche breaks down at 44
- Chronic migraines
- It's hereditary
- Nietzsche's father died of brain softening in his 40s

How does a virgin incel get syphilis anyway? His breakdown doesn't even match Syphilis (he lived too long after)

Syphilis story appears around WW1 anti-German propaganda:

- The Huns follow a philosopher who wrote "The Antichrist"

- He who was a sexual degenerate who died of syphilis

Story stuck, winners write history

Nietzsche:

- War veteran (field surgeon)
- Excellent cavalryman
- Youngest professor ever
- Large circle of friends
- Mountain hiker
- Ray Peat diet (meat fruit milk)
- Biohacker (chorale hydrate)
- Proto-digital nomad blogger

He was a mountain lion wandering in solitude

https://twitter.com/johnathanbi/status/1854192417995386991

Yes he was an incel… but that may because he was autistically asking Lou Salome for a “two year marriage”

He felt he had a “great work” to finish before settling down

The difference between Aryan and Islamic civilisation is the worship of naked body:

- Aryan high culture in Athens and Italy was a study in the perfection of the human form - hence the naked statues

- Islam has hard taboos against this, so their creativity gets channeled away from the body

- It tends to be abstract, inhuman, and surprisingly like a “psychedelic” screen saver

- It’s very beautiful in its own way, but noticeably “missing” a presence of “man”

- All through history, “by the book” religions tend to have a furious hate for Body Worship

- The Christians in Rome smashed Classical statues, Islam in the East smashed Buddhist statues

- When Protestants revolted against the Renaissance, they would scratch faces off Catholic art and “write lines of scripture” over them

- There’s a lot of politicised slop posting around these topics, but this comparison reveals a core truth about who you are


This is true, the Muslims argue that Aryan are is “sloppy” “beastly” and missing the starlike beauty of a pristine night sky that their art has

https://twitter.com/youbidoux/status/1853427139980251524

Could the British reform their nation using DNA citizenship?

- The British already have a huge Biobank of over 4+ million DNA sequenced Brits

- This is the largest national DNA bank on earth, it was set up in the early 2000s

- Politicians have proposed using it before…

—-

- Tony Blair wanted something like the American “patriot surveillance system” in the aftermath of 9/11

- Remember, London was bombed by “Islamic fundamentalists” in late 2005

- A “solution” to terror is usually precise information systems (surveillance)

- Foucaults Panopticon

- A small network (the state) with the ability to “watch” everyone with precision leads to easier control over large populations

- Think of the Chinese facial recognition system

- Tony Blair’s idea was to use Biometrics to achieve this control

- Sequence everyone’s DNA - then you can easily identify people who were at crime scenes - like Islamic terrorists

- Tony proposed to expand the DNA Biobank to the WHOLE British population in the aftermath of the London bombings

- But that never came to pass due to ethics boards

—-

- Yet, Tony Blair was the man who “opened Britain up” to immigrants

- The first large Asylum seeker waves arrived in the 90s (apparently Tony didn’t like this)

- East Europe joined the EU in 2004 and Poles flooded into England

- This kicked off the first “anti-immigrant” wave

- The hard right British National Party won 1 million votes and European seats in 2008

- In response, Brexit happened in 2016

—-

- Lately, Tony Blair has been saying he thinks a comprehensive digital ID system would be the “solution to immigration”

- Remember, the “powers” see immigration as an information control problem

- Millions of undocumented people sloshing around Europe is a headache

- A high ideal is a huge database of digital IDs that are connected to biometrics: pictures of face, height, medical records

- People can cross borders and still be easily tracked (you can’t change your DNA)

- Compare that to passports, fake IDs, and just running across borders and claiming “asylum”

- Tony has also proposed most of these recent ideas in a white paper about making Britain the “biotech nation of the future”

—-

- This all showing that not only could the British explore DNA citizenship

- It seems like some faction in the “elite” may already be dabbling in radical biotech solutions

- The “elite” think in terms of globalisation and open movement of people

- They want information system - that is the crux of modern state craft

- The more rational elites don’t “hate” nationalism, but see it as an obstacle to the open world market

- Dubai is an example of this - ruthless citizenship laws that privilege Arabs, but a fully open and multicultural city

- Perhaps Western countries will have to take radical “Dubai models” and DNA will be a part of that

—-

- Cavet: DNA citizenship could be a psychotic and draconian nightmare

- COVID for example was a biometric system ran by the state, can you trust the government with your blood?

- Time will tell…


The “people” think about identity, politics of demonstration, and control over their territory

The modern elite think about information systems, control flows over people, and the global network

The elite are talking about biometrics ALOT to help them do this

e.g.

The US southern border has facial recognition cameras that scans thousands of faces that pass the border and puts them in a database

Vaccine passports were one such global biometric system

They are discussing how to reform the state along these lines… the future state is a biometric state?

Birthrates are going to fall

You will live through the great deflation

Accept it

It will be like a hangover after a long night of drunken hallucinations

Your culture has been built on lies for almost a century and you have participated in them

You need to endure the punishment

You can build support technology like Robotics and Longevity to bolster labour and health

But you must destroy the idiots who want to wholesale replace Europeans to keep up GDP in their fake economies

Let it implode

The Renaissance happened after the Black Death

“I love those with the will to go down, for they will be the ones who make it over the bridge that is man”

Thus Spoke Zarathustra The destroyer is the herald of the creator

Why are the Irish and Scots ferocious warriors?

- Redhead genes have been shown to have a higher pain tolerance

- Gaels have a gene that makes them more prone to impulsive violence

- Gaels are literally hot headed monsters immune to pain

- These same impulse gene seem to give them unwavering courage in danger

- I knew a Scottish boxer who would get CALMER when a tense situation arose

- He’d become hyper aware, relaxed, and ready to attack - built for Pressure

- Conor McGregor is like this - under crushing pressure he is “Zen” and ready to express violence

- “Fighting clams me” McGregor once said

- Scotts-Gaels are known in the US army as great fighters

- This same warrior gene may also make Gaels prone to addiction and delinquency

- The Fentynal epidemic in the U.S. is most prominent in the Scotts-Gael areas

- The Irish are prone to alcoholism (big news I know)

- These unique traits in the Gaels make them frightening, exciting, and great in armies - but they are also less organised than Germanics

- The Swedish, Anglos and Germans are also great warriors - but in a far colder and more wolf like way

- Their bravery is almost robotic, it seems like they are much more capable of suppressing their impulsiveness to act

- Their courage is an expression of discipline, not instinct like the Gaels

- This gave them a huge advantage against the less organised Gaels

- Much of recent history has seen the Germanics organise these rowdy Gaels into their armed forces

- The French army was the most powerful in history and a blend of Norman and Celt

- The Scotts and even the Irish featured heavily in the British Empire

- Modern day Appalachians are renowned in the US military

- This team of Celtic and Norse have mastered the entire earth on several occasions


The recent political riots were in Dublin and Manchester

Manchester is very Gaelic, even high in Irish blood

Many Mancs have told me they prefer the Irish to “southern wankers”

Were these impulsive Celtic eruptions?

I was saying this since 2021:

- Apple cucked Facebook’s ad platform by shutting off its ability to collect user data through iPhones

- Zuck got redpilled on how powerless software is - hardware is the big dog and Facebook was a flea on the dogs fur

- He had to compete, but Apple had a monopoly so he couldn’t make a “Zuck phone”

- Zuck he realised he has to get to the NEXT big hardware early

- The overarching theory is that tech will eventually ENTER our bodies through interfaces - think neuralink or contact lenses

- This will create full immersive experience of tech - augmented reality where you “see the internet as an overlay of the world”

- Tech attached to your sense organs or brains - so if you though phones are ruining the world wait until you have ads in your dreams

- Zuck thought the next step would be headsets and the metaverse - hence he did the gay Meta rebrand and tried to sell headsets for LinkedIn meetings during lockdown

- He was wrong - he wasn’t reading the mood of the world which hated lockdowns and felt paranoid

- He became a meme and Meta stock crashed - so he started soul searching, watching Joe rogan, and taking TRT

- This gave him racist wrestler wisdom and he realised everything has to be cool and normal or it fails

- So he built slick sunglasses with AR installed

- This is Zucks play to beat the iPhone and control the next mass hardware platform The questions are:

- if this is happening how do you put the prediction to the test? Do you invest in Meta as they’re on a downtrend but may come to dominate?

- What’s the investing huerietic? Or unfair advantage?

- is augmentation too unnatural and will hit hard limits with uptake? Phones are just about natural enough to be tolerable

What if Judaism is a “constructed” religion?

In the video below @Gnosisinformant and @Know_More_News present to me a few strange pieces of evidence to suggest this thesis

Here’s the jist:

- There was a Jewish community in Elephantine, Egypt in 400BC that was practicing a “pagan” version of Judaism

- At this stage they should have been following “Mose’s Torah” and Jerusalem should have been enforcing standard Judaism - but they don’t mention the Torah and Jerusalem was supportive of this group?

- “They were likely a result of Judean refugees fleeing into Egypt during the Babylonian invasions. They seem to have had no knowledge of a written Torah or the narratives described therein”

- Quite a big thing to forget! The Torah is the foundation of the religion?

- It seems a lot of the Torah was only written AFTER this? This is bizzare… was it “constructed”?

- Platonism was hugely popular at the time in Egypt, as Plato was only brand new and had spread through Alexander the Great as the “great philosopher of the World”

- The thesis is that as the Hellenic Empire founded by Alexander the Great was collapsing - Judas Maccabee led a revolt to seize the old territory of Judea

- This Judea was only ever a pagan nation, like any other, that had been consumed by great Babylon

- Judas and his lineage wanted to create a “National myth” to unite this people - so he employed the best thinkers of the time to build a religion - like a propaganda team

- These thinkers took the old pagan customs of Judea and used Plato’s ideas in the Republic to reformulate them into “Judaism” - so not “fake” but much more “constructed” than we may think

- The problem here is how much this undermines the validity of the Torah and as a consequence all three major Abrahamic religions

- Moses, the Torah, and the mighty history of the one true God might be a Platonic “noble lie” put together out of Jewish paganism in 170 BC

—-

Counter arguments:

- There’s very old Egyptian Steele’s etc. apparently mentioning “Israel” granting validity to an ancient past

- The Hyksos masters of Egypt look an awful lot like “the Israelites” granting validity to the Torah

—-

Watch the video and give me your thoughts! Video in full:

Western morality has a ridiculous tinge of cuckoldry:

- Force my daughter to bear the child of her rapist

- The youth should roll over and be plundered by international finance because “Free Market”

- The legal immigrants can definitely replace our natives in elite universities because that’s “a fair system”

- Jews have a right to a homeland, but we do not because that’s evil bigotry

Most of those “on the right” are completely infected with this

It’s a deep spiritual disease

Larping as based Christian doesn’t fix it

The Churches are rank with this, and even the political right wing is servile to the higher predicate of Jewish guilt

Jordan Peterson sublimates all his native will to power and satisfies it through the success of Israel - total spiritual cuckoldry

It’s an enormous internal revolution to overcome all this and learn to believe in yourself

It’s like a depressed person who hates themselves - and who has made a life out of hating themselves - having to overcome that whole way of being and love themselves

A total revolution

The future will be hinge on a critical mass of us going through this inner psychological revolution

Otherwise there won’t be a future I think I’ve been through this internal revolution for the most part - and I notice an enormous revulsion, a disgust, when I feel this energy of people

Peterson, Farage, Charlie Kirk - they are like patients with a serious infection and around them I must put on gloves

The Arab states are looking to absorb tens of millions of wealthy high IQ whites from South Africa and the UK

They’re going to offer them low taxes, no propaganda in school, and then just leave them alone

The West is haemorrhaging talent

From @fentanylblwdart The Arabs states are unapologetically Muslim

They don’t offer “equality” - instead it’s a hardline religious hierarchy but it offers basic respect:

- low taxes
- no demoralising propaganda
- “if you behave, we’ll leave you alone”

People flock to it - they don’t want “equality”

Middle Easterners, Jews and even Christians like Jordan Peterson say Europe was always backwards

The Middle East birthed civilisation and “fixed” Europe

Well it turns out that’s wrong: the first cities were in Europe

Furthermore, writing also arose first in Europe

These cities were wiped out by the plague

David Reich was testing samples from this period and 15% of the samples had the bubonic “Black Death” bacteria

It wiped out 30%-50% of the population

The “Aryans” invaded right after this, perhaps filling the vacuum

A strange habit of the Western mind is how it anchors its morality to moments in History:

The Europeans grieved at the foot of the cross and learned morality itself stemmed from this event

Over the last 75 years these moral structures have been passed onto the Holocaust

No other religion does this that I'm aware of - not Islam, Hinduism, Greek Paganism - this is unique to Europeans

Look at the bizarre similarities between these events:

- Both centre on the plight of suffering Jews - the central figures are not Europeans, but victims of European violence

- Both were acts of organised state violence committed by strong militaristic powers (Rome & the Nazis)

- Both had huge legal force behind them - the punishment for Christian blasphemy was death, and being called a Nazi can destroy your life in modernity

- Both imply the existence of a demonic original sin within the European soul that evolves into "Pagan Monstrousness" if left unchecked

- Both conquer this pagan demonic force within the Europeans by forcing them to meditate on the suffering of the victim until it induces heavy guilt

- Both involve a systematic and ritualised remembrance of the horror and the suffering - the films and museums about the Holocaust and the constant recitation of the torture and execution of Christ in the church

Why is this?

Are Europeans uniquely prone to guilt?
This extreme creation of a guilty conscience within Europeans has led to quite incredible things

Take for example the banning of slavery during the colonial era - not only by Britain, but early on by Spain due to a Christian guilt for the conquered

https://x.com/uberboyo/status/1808186391328960602

Churchill was the manager of the decline of the British Empire

The Empire had been on the downtrend for decades at that point

The elites all know that the mighty British Empire couldn't even hold its next door neighbour Ireland

Churchill put a 5k assassination price on the head of revolutionary Michael Collins, but Michael Collins proved too evasive

Churchill accepted he'd have to work with him

Michael said: “we could never have done anything without Churchill”

This marked a global trend - the British were giving up resisting its loss of territorial power - they couldn't hold it anymore

They were instead preparing for the future in two ways:

---

1 - They morphed into a financial power

All the Islands across the world they owned - Caymans, Bahamas, Isle of Man, Jersey

They all became tax havens and wealth hiding banks

To this day 60% of the world's paper wealth is held in accounts in these territories

The City of London acts as a hub for this "globalist" caste - its not even a part of the British state

---

2 - The British integrated with the US

The World Wars forged a new integration between Britain and the US - a large part of it was Britain accepting to let the US lead

Churchill once shouted at French General Charles de Gaulle in 1945:"Each time I must choose between you and Roosevelt, I shall choose Roosevelt"

Germany was a rising power on the continent that was going to lead a powerful new Europe

Germany also made the offer to Britain for it to ally together but it would have a secondary role to new Germany

The British elite and the interested financiers chose the US (Germany was explicitly against high finance)

---

All this concluded that the last act of the British Empire was for Churchill to bleed Germany before it had the chance to express its destiny

After this, the old empire was to fade into irrelevance as the Anglo-US rose to world hegemony Cast aside talk about "morality" and who was "the good guy"

The US had a golden age after WW2 - it was right for it to fight for its position as world power

Now it is sinking into decline itself and must face the horrible reality of this instead of romanticising

Germany was gunning for its place as leader of the world so it could instead have the golden age

This is rational, there was nothing "evil" about its behaviour - thats an anglosphere lie

Its clear now 75 years later that Germany would NOT have set up a project like "population replacement"

Europeans are going to see the Anglo victory as a tragedy in the future and see Germany as the heroic last stand - something like the 300 Spartans

No one would have thought this in the 1980s - everyone loved America

This is how badly the current managers have screwed up with mass migration

Irishman Peter Sutherland is called the "father of Globalisation"

He's been consulted about how to prepare states for Globalisation around the world

---

@PangurBn10 posted a few videos recently with Peter speaking about his own justifications for dismantling Irish identity:

1 - Nation states all "have" to become "more Open" and multicultural to join the future world

2 - Demographic collapse because of low boomer birthrates means immigration must be used to replace labour

3 - The US and Australia are "migrant states" and so are more open, whereas Ireland "nurses" its own homogeneity and is trapped in the past

4 - Peter said in order to modernise Europe, the EU should actively work to undermine national identity of places like Ireland

5 - His moral beliefs suggest that: "Nationalism is based on the idea that one person is better than another"

6 - "I believe Europe should be a federal system where all nation states "share" sovereignty - this is vital to stop us reliving the worst moments of the 20th century"

---

This man was one of the most significant craftsman of the modern world order

You have to wonder about many things:

- Is he cynically lying and has private justifications of advances to make?

- Is he a true believer and sees this multicultural project as an almost moral action?

- Was he much more stupid than most think, and just assumed all this would work out? Other videos

Rebuilding the Asylum System is an article written by George Soros in 2015

It reveals why national governments like Ireland's can't seem to say no to "the plan" and why enormous funding is pouring into these projects

---

Points made:

- Europe needs to reform and develop an EU wide asylum system

- The EU has to accept at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future

- The EU should provide €15,000 ($16,800) per asylum-seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health care, and education costs

- The EU can raise these by selling bonds (putting the EU into debt)

- The EU would need to make an annual commitment to frontline countries (Lebanon, Turkey etc.) of at least €8-10 billion - also funded with bonds

- The EU must immediately start building a single EU Asylum and Migration Agency and eventually a single EU Border Guard

- Safe channels must be established for asylum-seekers, starting with getting them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries

- The operational and financial arrangements developed by the EU should be used to establish global standards for the treatment of asylum-seekers and migrants

- To absorb and integrate more than a million asylum seekers and migrants a year, the EU needs to mobilize the private sector – NGOs, church groups, and businesses – to act as sponsors

---

Victor Orban had an alternative plan, but Soros shut it down:

"Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has now also produced a plan to address the crisis.

But his plan, which subordinates the human rights of asylum-seekers and migrants to the security of borders

It threatens to divide and destroy the EU by renouncing the values on which it was built and violating the laws that are supposed to govern it"

---

Orban's plan:

- Hungary will propose that each of the 28 EU members pays 1% of its income from the Union, plus 1% of its contributions to it, into a special fund.

- In Hungary's case, that would amount to €1bn (£720m; $1.1bn)

- The proposed special fund would be used, Mr Orban will argue, to improve conditions in the refugee camps in countries neighbouring Syria - especially Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan

- This fund would also be used to create a robust Border Guard for Europe to prepare it to vet and order any large influx

- In essence Orban wanted to build camps abroad so the refugees didn't have to come to Europe


Soros posted a new article on the same website in 2023

This time he's discussing how democracy may be destroyed by what he calls "the Polycrisis"

- Ai revolution
- climate change
- The Russo-Ukraine war

His suggestion is that Ai is the biggest crisis and it needs to be regulated heavily across the world

Next he discusses the growing threat of climate change and how actions need to be more intense, but they will risk destabilisation

Lastly he addresses the Russia war, and states his hope that a Ukrainian counter attack will win them the war - after which US and China will calm the temperature - and the world will go back to fighting climate change

A century ago, the U.S. had 0% income taxes

This was because it was a Mercantile Economy

It created fantastic products and then sold them to other countries with a tax (tariff)

These tariffs made enough money to run the country

Mercantilism is considered unfair because it allows strong states to exploit weaker colonial states

The World Order now tries to stop this behaviour and encourage "free trade" instead

---

Free trade governments agree not to put tariffs on goods or control trade systems

"The disaster of World War II underscored the potential danger of nationalistic policies. It also prodded the world toward global trading and relationships as a way to combat them"

Interestingly, as the West has embraced free trade, it had to increase income taxation and money printing

---

After dropping Mercantile policy, modern governments have to build something called fiscal capacity

This is their ability to assess income and enforce tax payments

The US has a world renown fiscal capacity - but this has taken 100 years to build up

In that time the productive capacity of the United States has dropped as they've began to "off shore" their manufacturing

They've taken their place as the financial centre in the "free trade" world, not the productive centre

---

China has chosen to become the trade centre - and they have a mercantilist growth strategy

They are now the manufacturing powerhouse of the world and host most of the factories

Due to the sheer power of their productive output many believe they are about to become the new world Hegemon

This is a big part of the "globalist" vs "nationalist" question

Nationalist state prefer to go Mercantile - early US, Britain, Venice

But you HAVE to have a ruthless Navy to enforce your will with violence

The "free trade" sphere is an alliance of nations

The US agrees to enforce the free trade paradigm as hegemon who gives out the $$$

No nationalist states can rise up within that, unless they are willing and capable of taking on this power

"Globalists" are international businessmen who have learned to dynamically operate cross borders in this free trade world

Nationalism is the fundamental threat to this paradigm, so they throttle it

Would you be more accepting of a multicultural Ireland if the natives had an exclusive citizenship privilege?

Dubai asserts a privileged citizenship status for the native Arabs - it's very difficult to become a citizen

Yet - they keep Dubai wide open to foreigners and reward productive ones hugely (0% tax, very safe)

There's no asylum scamming

The native Arabs are hugely outnumbered - yet, they rule as an aristocracy

This is how Islam naturally works - it's a religion that grants Arabs the "divine right of kings" over a territory

Would you embrace something like this in Ireland? Or is it foreigners being present that you specifically oppose?

Does anyone more left leaning have an opinion?

I think the crux of the problem in the West is the approach towards the natives - citizenship has no meaning or privilege

The natives get frustrated and feel exploited DNA passports or DNA citizenship is very autistic, so don't see it ever working - but, its an interesting way of imagining how this could look

The 80 million people in the Irish Diaspora get granted DNA citizenship to Ireland - then Ireland is opened up much like Dubai

All the liberals can have their diverse restaurants - everyone can visit, and even work

But the Irish have a deep sense of security that the nation is theirs and theirs exclusively - they are the privileged citizens of this open Ireland

---

I can see an argument against this "openness" as well

Historically, multicultural projects eventually fall into conflict regardless of these privileges

Hapsburg Austria literally had a royalty, and they ended up being assassinated by one of their minorities

So in the long run, Dubai may destabilise

Some surprising alternative visions of the European Union:

- Oswald Mosely's idea of a racial superstate to rival Russia and America

- Kalergi's suggestion of uniting Europe with Africa into a massive Empire

- The conspiracy theory by Bat Yo'er that the French were planning to make Europe Muslim

---

1 - Europe a Nation

Oswald Mosely was a British fascist who proposed that all Europeans are part of a united race (a nation is a race)

This race could form the foundation of a "European State" which gave Europeans a united political force to express their interests

Mosley saw it as the only defence against Europe becoming the scene of the power struggles between the United States and the Soviet Union in the Cold War

Interestingly, Kalergi also proposed his PanEuropa for the same reason of resisting America and the USSR

Mosley suggested this primarily be driven by the Northern people of France, Britain, Germany, Scandinavia, and the Slavic States not under Communism

But he was clear that the Southern Europeans should be welcomed and integrated

But his hard rule of a racial project meant some extreme suggestions:

"The entire Jewish population in Europe was to be expelled to Palestine, where they could decide their own fate"

"Africa was to be retained by the united Europe as a giant colony, with apartheid implemented on a continental basis, effectively excluding Blacks from Europe"

"The ending of the British Empire and Britian's integration into the European Nation"

The last notion, about giving up on the British Empire, actually lost Mosley a lot of support in Britain and so he stopped pushing the idea

---

2 - Eurafrica

This was a proposition to include Morrocco, Lybia, other parts of Africa, and much of the Levant in a Federation alongside the European states

This was actually popular in Germany, and even among far right circles - probably because of the idea of enforcing apartheid on the colonies

Kalergi created the first popular vision of a united Europe in PanEuropa

He suggested something like Eurafrica: the idea that a large shared territory between Europe and Africa was inevitable and would become somewhat Imperial and begin to racially "blend"

This line of thinking is actually still very popular - Macron has made suggestions about integrating with Africa more closely:

"The future of Europe lies in the Mediterranean basin and European-African sphere of influence"

---

3 - Eurabia

There is an Egyptian born Jewish woman Bat Ye'or who lives in France

She wrote in the early 2000s that some members of the French EU political elite was entertaining the idea of integrating Europe with the Muslim world

This would create Eurabia and give Europe the power to separate from the United States sphere of influence

It would also crush Israel's power in the Middle East

She suggested that Europe was on its way to subjugating itself to Islam

"Europe will be Islamic by the end of the century" - Jewish historian Bernard Lewis

Bat Ye'or has be castigated as a "deranged conspiracy theorist" for this theory

Fellow Jew Adi Schwartz made fun of her calling her idea: "the Protocols of the Elders of Brussels"

---

So Racist Superstate, African Alliance, or Euro-Caliphate?

Which way Western Man...

Frenchcels... making Europe Muslim?

Germoids... making Europe African?

Britcels... refusing to unite with Europe so they can LARP as Victorians?

Maybe we're all retarded

In dogs, a major cause of inbreeding and genetic diseases is when a "stud" dog breeds with many females

Islam encourages harem style marriages - Africans do this as well

Some of the least inbred people on earth - the nordic Germans - were monogamous even in prehistory

https://twitter.com/RokoMijic/status/1820820062611116198

European Kings often have enormous harems of mistresses - some French Kings had hundreds

Charlemagne has 20 children by 9 wives, and so many of us in Europe are related to him

This type of "stud" breeding can happen and not cause problems - this is predicated on an extremely healthy general population

As we known from the Hapsburg's Jaw - if royal inbreeding goes unchecked it destroys them

The final consequence of this knowledge may lead to something amazing:

A strong scientific understand of nature will lead to a realisation that group morality actually leads to eugenic outcomes

This then becomes a bio-scientific religion of the future

The pursuit of health

Imagine DNA passports that grant you access to a "European System" that is spread across the globe?

- It provides access to gated European communities worldwide
- Private schools
- You have security firms and police forces to take care of them
- It gives you a passport
- It provides a currency and banking system like Revolut

---

Premise & Problem:

- The Western world and its many states are becoming nakedly hostile to people of European descent

- Large structures like the EU, the US and normal states are going to become more oppressive with Ai surveillance tech, robots, drones etc.

- An advanced technological state possessed by an ideology that is anti-European (and anti-Life) risks a genocide or even extinction event

- Many genocides took place in Africa when the colonial states broke down

- So a question: are there ways to prepare to mitigate this?

---

Globalised Nationalism

- The Jews are a nation - they remain part of the Jewish nation no matter where they go - they existed for 2000 years without a "state"- this was a DNA based concept

- Israel is their homeland, it is a state structure with an army - it is not the same as the nation - 20% of the people in Israel are Arabs

- You may think of Ireland as "the Island in North Atlantic" but instead think of the 80 million Irish across the world as "The Irish Nation"

- Each European can see themselves the same - the British, French, Italian, Russian & German genome - these "genomes" or "nations" could all identify themselves with DNA and then come together as an organisation

- This European DNA system would be something like the EU and the same size as China - 1 billion people globally

- Technological DNA passports would be an objective system to grant citizenship to this

- But how does that help?

---

1 - Security

- As nation states get to the point where they wont protect Europeans, how do you guarantee security?

- You pool resources to fund private gated communities, security forces, and private schooling systems

- These could be all across the globe in many territories and only accessible if you're a citizen

- This would be more like a religious system that operates the way international Christianity, Islam or Judaism operates - but it's DNA based

- I'm not saying you abandon "states" "politics" and "territories" - the above religions dont

- Instead I'm suggesting you facilitate a way to improve the safety of Europeans all across the world with these tools

- For example, if these private security firms build up a reputation - this offers a significant deterrent to any hostile states who may allow pogroms to be carried out on Europeans

---

2 - Banking System

- 51% of households in Britain take more welfare than they pay in taxes - the welfare state is the largest part of the British state - how do you help Europeans protect their assets from an economic implosion?

- Imagine you create a blockchain based currency that you can't access without DNA passport verification

- Verification gives you a tool like Wise or Revolut where you can manage money and store wealth

- The money in this system is tied to the productivity of the European race globally, so it'll obviously become the most valuable currency on earth

- you can spend it wherever and transfer wealth into other currencies

- It gives out interest free loans

---

3 - Dangers

- Don't see how attempting to create a new banking system and currency wouldn't end up in an all out war

- Why wouldn't the UN, EU, and US all make this a pariah project and mark all involved as a terrorist?

- A hostile actor could create a bioweapon to kill all DNA in the project - and where do you store the DNA?

- Hostile Europeans may try subvert the project?

- Would it be too decentralised to have any organisation capacity at all?

- European nations have always fought throughout history - why wouldn't they fight again? Perhaps a code of warfare is decided - no dysgenic national wars - war done in the old style - still seems unrealistic

---

What do you think? Retarded or feasible?

---

Art by @EcceGloboHomo
Think of a very simple first step

Safe Schools:

- funding goes to buying a school

- DNA passport to join or teach

- private security for school - so no kids ever stabbed

- no “woke” schooling

- get onboard European businesses to hire from schools