So let's start with our task of dismantling the narrative. The claim for the marraige in the source he used has its citations as follow. None of which are contemporary or even near contemporary. It's nansi ri khyat (17th century) & mirat-i-sikandari(17th century) as evidences for

https://twitter.com/The__Chalukya/status/1885314481720291356

the marraiges claimed to be happened in 15th century. Now for Rao jodha marrying his daughter to qyamkhani chiefs. First they too are rajputs only so even if any such marraige was proposed i see no issue with it. But let's look at citations. Again non

https://x.com/i/status/1885314486736748868

The term rajputra is proposed by rajputs to be term denoting the caste of clans like (bhati,guhil,prathihar & chuhan etc) 7 or 8th century onward. Whereas other claim it to be term denoting class, a prince or a title assumed to be irrespective of birth. Let see what is it. First we conclude how the term. rajputra in the given context (7th century onwards) neccesrly no where refers to a prince. In this regard my evidences include an inscription of Lichchhavis period which identifies certain people as rajputra. These people are employees of the state

Should I start refuting it point by point ?? Seriously isse aacha expect kiya tha maine maratho so .Cope hi karna tha tho thorre dhang se karte hai. Khair chorro let's refute it.

https://twitter.com/Maharattakshtra/status/1992223073249210634

First of all using this as an example he is trying to portray that rajputra neccescrely is not a birth based identity as it's clubbed together with other aristocracy classes(not neccescrely birth based as per him) being called out here. Well first this

https://x.com/Maharattakshtra/status/1992223089032384875?t=jTcLSjWzdPLUXE67QAR6KQ&s=19

Let's begin with the dissection of the arguments this jhatu has to put forward. A remainder for everyone as by the end of this thread I have something to post apart from this refutation of mine for the claims made by this jhattu.

https://twitter.com/PussyRajputani/status/1910994769687327067

Here this jhattu claims that this incident of ratan singh being captured by allauddin by deceit is a bardic creation. Here have a contemporary jain source(authored by a Jain serving under the authority of dehli sultanate)for it. It clearly mentions this.

https://x.com/PussyRajputani/status/1910995018002706682?t=MIcts6iLnrh8K-WZjhqzXQ&s=19

And the source for the claim. Ahh let me guess ashiqui a fictional account by khusru rather than any historical one. Even his own historical account no where mention this shit. And not refuted?? What's left in it to be refuted?? The source claims alleged capture of devaldevi in

https://twitter.com/Indicaa02/status/1897718226508808379

2nd invasion ofgujrat dated to be 1306 again the only source ever recording this claim of 2nd invasion is ashiqui only no other contemporary ever penned down any invasion of gujrat in 1306. In this second invasion of gujrat it's claimed in ashiqui that under the supervision of