More than half the population of the Subcontinent is Muslim, this is the greatest failure of Brahmins, who lavished in their Mutts while the Sufis worked to convert people, debated and defeated the Brahmins again and again in Religious Debates.

https://twitter.com/purusa0x6c/status/1965656405811363920

Punjab, which was a hub of Brahmins practices as per the Vedas, lost to the cult if Khatris and Jatts called Sikhism.

Imagine getting intellectually dominated by Jatt Sikhs who revel in being identified as thinkers.

How collectively stupid one has to be?

Those who post-1947 have been forced into the Hindu Religion Khichdi should really be divided into at least 7 religious groups.

4 of the Standard Varnas, 1 of the Mixed Varnas, 1 of the Avarnas, and 1 of the Tribals.

The last 2 are already treated separate to a great extent. The Colonial Legal/Administrative/Reformist policy ensured that all groups who today form the Hindus are identified under the emasculated reformist sect of Advaita Vedanta, when it was never the case.

Just like how they put all Muslims under Fatawa-i-Alamgiri from Bengal.

The camp of these Madrasi Iyers, the likes of Manastaramgini are quite weak in their study of the religion they claim to be experts in.

So are all the Brahmins who keep chanting Niyoga-Niyoga on the Heroes of Mahabharata and even Lord Rama, their claims are false. Manusmriti (9.59) and other Dharmashastras, ostensibly the only texts of (as of yet) uncontested Brahmin origin themselves mention that Levirate (Niyoga) can happen only with the Sapinda (सपिण्ड) of the husband of the woman.

But they shamelessly repeat their vile propaganda.

Proof of the pudding lies in the eating.

If one looks at India's occupation be it Tukic, European, or whatever, large parts of India were ruled by Rajputs before they came and were ruled by Rajputs when they left while upstarts were rising and falling like flies in the summer. t.co/L1s7UpYav9 Jadunath Sarkar was a member of the Socialist system who through his authority on history promoted the yet untested Lala Land of Democracy.

The feudal order of the Rajputs never fit his definition of the desirable. His association with Hindu Socialists didn't help either.

Hindutva was coined in 1923, texts like Raso in adulation of Prithviraj Chauhan have existed centuries prior to Savarkar's creation of Hindutva.

Rajputs reacted to protect their history after Hindutvavadis attacked them, this Rajput response created awareness not Hindutvavadis.

https://twitter.com/GaikwadAnkur/status/1402342441844297728

It has appeared that some believers in the political ideology of Hindutva have come forth to argue that the term was coined not by V. D. Savarkar but by Chandranath Basu.

To that I will say that the only relvant Hindutva of today is the Hindutva of Savarkar and not of Basu.

Thread on the so called, "Rajput torment of Odia Hindus", that never was... During the medieval age, especially prior to the 'Mughal Invasion', Orissa was ruled by Karrani Afghans, who had replaced Mukund Deva, a Gajapati ruler of Telugu Eastern Chalukya origin, and sent Kalapahad to destroy not just the Jagannath Temple but also the Konark Sun Temple.

Thread on the ancient Yadava Kshatriyas, that I am also covering on other platforms. It will be concerned with the real Yadavas that form today's Rajput clans.

#RealYadavas Part I - The Mahaban (Mathura) Inscription of Raja Ajayapala Deva, of the Surasena Yadava Jadaun Rajput Dynasty. This inscription establishes the rule of the Jadauns over Mathura before the Islamic invasions.

https://x.com/yashasvipratap/status/1284549398450466816