This is why your job as a trader is to prepare for the next trend in advance—to ensure you have cash on hand to do what most can't: buy low.
It's far easier to save what you've gained & multiply it than to multiply just to compensate for what you've lost. x.com/search?q=from%…
Dec 12, 2022 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Men and women bargain over the cost of sex and do little else.
If you keep your relative value high and negotiate properly, sex will always cost nothing to you materially, but you won't have the time even for one tenth of what's available to you.
But this is not about sex.
For women, sex is 𝘵𝘩𝘦 tool of negotiation for resources.
To succeed, they have to bargain as many resources for as little sex as possible.
But without sex, female bargaining power on the market is low compared to men.
That's why female professions converge around sex.
Dec 11, 2022 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
The overlords of the West will do everything in their power to make racial labour quotas mandatory.
Why?
They've destroyed the credibility of a university degree by admitting African/Hispanic students with scores inferior to their “white” peers.
What do businesses do about it?
Business know that by hiring a “white” or Asian straight out of university, they are much more likely to get a superior performer than if they hire an African/Hispanic person.
And they are perfectly reasonable to do just that.
Nov 5, 2019 • 13 tweets • 5 min read
Over the course of this night I'll be destroying all your favourite "twitter influencers", who are nothing more, nothing else than shills.
Let's begin.
¹ Over the past days, I've seen nearly all opinion mouths bash that "Texas academician" for releasing a study that claims a single party drove the price of BTC to $20k:
"Failed to understand the market structure of Bitcoin!"
"Riddled with errors & fundamental misunderstandings!"
Apr 2, 2018 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
I find it rather amusing when people quit with reading certain authors because "it's hard to read" or "doesn't capture the attention."
That's consumerism. That attitude won't help you find knowledge.
I'll explain why and guarantee — you will start thinking outside the box.
To treat reading as consumption is a hundred percent wrong approach.
It is easy to spot consumerist readers because they have nothing of their own; ideas they read somewhere, rehashed and repeated.
Does this image feel cheap, "too stock" and boring?
So do consumerist readers.
Dec 18, 2017 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
1/ It's extremely difficult to memorize disjointed, disassembled information.
You have to reassemble it to memorize it.
And the only to reassemble it is to put it in a context of a concept you're familiar with.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @zaoyang view original on Twitter
2/ To put new information in an already familiar concept you use analogies.
That's the efficient way of memorizing new information.
The inefficient way is to learn new concepts from scratch.
