Zack Colman Profile picture
climate & energy reporter @politico. @KSJatMIT & @michiganstateu alum. zcolman@politico.com (RT≠endorsement)
divlawyer Profile picture 1 subscribed
Sep 30, 2022 13 tweets 3 min read
Ian is a warning about growth at any cost.

People forced to rebuild their lives face a combo of soaring insurance premiums, construction costs & interest rates. Many homes lacked flood insurance.

This recovery might look different from past disasters.
politico.com/news/2022/09/3… Lack of flood insurance will make rebuilding more costly. While Floridians are more insured than any other state against deluges, just 18%of homeowners have coverage through the federally run flood insurance program. Those federal policies also only cover up to $250k in damage.
Sep 28, 2022 5 tweets 2 min read
Ian nears a Cat 5.

The Tampa region is one of the coast’s most vulnerable areas: it’s low-lying & densely populated. 24% of ppl live in the floodplain.

The danger has been well-known for decades. Development continued apace.

This could be devastating.

politico.com/news/2022/09/2… It’s not as if people didn’t know the risk.

Hillsborough County, where Tampa sits, has a more than decade-old post-disaster redevelopment plan that calls for steering building away from places that climate change is making unsuitable for living.
Aug 2, 2021 7 tweets 2 min read
Lots of climate stuff in the bipartisan infrastructure bill, even if it’s less than what environmental groups and the broader Democratic caucus wanted.

Here’s a thread of some items… (1/X) $2.6b for NOAA research:

$492m for ocean/coastal security

$491m for Great Lakes

$492m for flood and inundation mapping /forecasting (coastal and inland)

$50m for wildfire forecasting

$200m for marine debris

$100m for improving coastal, ocean & Great Lakes observations
May 28, 2021 5 tweets 1 min read
Biden's budget would deliver a huge boost to climate spending -- $36 billion-worth, a $14 billion increase over 2021 levels.

I broke it down here for Pros:

bit.ly/3upMsQA Of note for FY22:

$3.7b in clean energy incentives, including $$ for existing nuclear

$1.1b for energy efficiency incentives

End $3.5b oil/gas incentives & change foreign oil/gas taxation to bring in $4.2b more

30% >for clean energy research, including $5b for new demo office
Jan 26, 2021 6 tweets 5 min read
SCOOP here on what's become a sort of common pattern -- an oil & gas industry group secretly funded the PR push for a Wyoming taxpayer-backed study that said a federal drilling pause would cost states billions.

bit.ly/3cijGMj w/ @ItsDocumented @ItsDocumented When Biden rolls out his expected pause on new federal oil and gas leasing, I guarantee you'll hear this study referenced by opponents. It will probably get into media coverage.

And industry quietly financed the talking points, PR push and other materials you'll likely hear.