4) ETH and SOL have 2 very distinct BlockSpace types to solve the BlockSpace race.
🦧ETH: BlockSpace- type L, limited supply, price(gas fees) scale according to demand
◎ SOL: BlockSpace- type U, unlimited supply, more demand increases BlockSpace supply instead of price
5) Advantages of Limited BlockSpace (Type L) 📦:
- Bots 🤖 are penalized (limit spam)
- Anyone can send transactions through albeit paying the market price for Blockspace
Disadvantage:
- Surge pricing during congestion ⛔️
- scalability (can be solved with Rollup)
6) Advantages of Unlimited BlockSpace (Type U) 🧱:
- more scalability ⚖️
- flat fees
Disadvantage:
- bots will literally take down the network to mint JPEG 🎨.
7) Why can't you have both cheaper fees and more block space?
A lot of these have to do with making tradeoffs in the Transaction Quality Dilemma, outlined here
*Your users can't afford to burn money, mine can.*
We are not the same
* this is a joke btw, don't take it too seriously
11) Back to SOL◎
Solana is having this problem because there are no effective fees market.
bots are literally spamming with no penalty ⛔️
On Eth, you at least still pay high gas for failed transactions.
12) How does Solana plan to solve this problem? 🏗️
solution:
- limit spam: QUIC -> TLDR; Rate Limit Spam 🦔
- introducing per account fee market: NFT mint will only cause surge pricing for NFT mint and not for other users
End)
BlockSpace as a commodity is a new thesis currently in development 🖥️.
It will likely play a significant role in the near future but may be too early for now.
There are other factors that play a role 👑 here as well MEV, Rollup, Gaming, etc.
*Further Clarification:
To prioritize Txs so you can mint NFT first, you can do 2 things:
- ETH (Limited Blockspace): pay higher gas
- SOL (Unlimited Blockspace/ Flat fees): spam to make sure your Txs are in front.
*on ApeChain new L1:
new L1 with more backspace doesn't necessarily fix this (more blockspace -> more spam) unless you have spam detection (QUIC, etc).
ImmutableX L2 on StarkEx was able to achieve this although this introduces a bit of centralization
NEAR Edges 🧀:
- $800m+ in ecosystem funds from basically all the VCs
- $USN
- Thriving NFT community
- Sharding
- Aurora - faster EVM chain than AVAX-C-chain
- Trustless Rainbow bridge
2/x
NEAR USN 💸:
The repo binary-star was leaked. The design and incentive structure is very similar to Terra UST.
There will be 3 stability mechanisms:
- NEAR and stablecoin Reserve Fund backed
- On-chain arbitrage contract
- StableSwap stabilization
2/ In an ideal world, the highest transaction quality means
- anyone can send a transaction (no censorship)
- no spam
- low fees
Obviously, this is not possible so you can only have 2 of the 3. Some compromises need to be made.
3/ MEV made this a very difficult problem to solve.
- no spam + low fees: censorship like web2 is needed
- no censorship + low fees: MEV searchers will always spam to get their Txs in front
- no censorship + no spam: You need a fee market to prioritize Txs.
1/ A Thought Experiment:
The Ship of Theseus of Blockchain and L2.
Blockchain has 3 comps: Execution, Consensus, and Data Availability (DA).
Replacing Exec:
At first, L2 starts out as replacing just the execution layer and rollup on the Eth consensus layer.
2/
Replacing DA:
There is also work being done like Celestia and Avail to replace DA but still relying on ETH as a consensus layer.
Replacing Consensus:
Finally, there is a solution like Arbitrum's Anytrust to replace ETH consensus with a committee and post block hash on ETH.
3/ Question: If we keep replacing the chain's main components and just use them as a fallback,
Is it still fundamentally the same chain, is it still ETH?