Trump noticed that Steele’s firm received a UK Data Protection Act of 1998 violation but this is the exact same law Trump’s Cambridge Analytica violated. Which is worse, a privacy breach against a couple of Putin’s oligarchs or all US registered voters?
When I began my effort to get Cambridge Analytica busted for mass data abuse under the UK DPA 98, I was warned that the English justice system was made for the rich, especially Russian oligarchs. So true. So true.
Just in case you’re a recent follower and haven’t seen me tweet this excerpt from @ICOnews report on Cambridge Analytica and Facebook mass data abuse scandal #TheGreatHack ico.org.uk/action-weve-ta…
Where is the @ICOnews report that it told @DamianCollins of @CommonsDCMS in spring 2019 was forthcoming in autumn 2019? We know Mr Collins is intimating here that Russian IPs accessed the scandalous Cambridge data. Is Barr and/or Gove obstructing release?
It’s a cruel cruel irony that the Alfa bank oligarch gets UK DPA 98 justice against Steele who had legit concerns CA/SCL was kompromizable asset but many millions of innocents across many countries get nothing of the sort since the Mercers got away with it completely scot free.
Trumpists will never realize or acknowledge that Chris Steele could have simply put Orbis into administration/liquidation into another holding company like the Mercers did with Emerdata Ltd. If Steele had done that he would’ve immunized himself from the UK DPA and other claims.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.