Biggest set of Amruta pills for all #5561BCE supporters: my small set of workshop questions:
Q1: Should we ignore verse 16 of chapter 2 of Bhisma Parva?
Option 1: Better ignore if we wish to make MBH more ancient?
Option 2: Never ignore Vyasa.
Amruta pills for #5561BCE supporters:
Q2:What does the Ch2 verse 16 mean for AV obs?
Option A: It means nothing. If we close our eyes and pretend it’s not there, it will go away.
Option B: It means that the AV observation has transient context.
Amruta pills for #5561BCE supporters:
Q3: Should we ignore the context of the verses of the verses coming before the AV observation?
Option 1: Of course. Who cares about context.
Option 2: Better take context as it gives a better picture.
Amruta pills for #5561BCE supporters:
Q4: Does the explicit presence of the word ” Nimitta” defining the AV observation mean that Karl Popper cannot be applied to it?
Option 1: Who cares. Let’s apply it.
Option 2: Popper himself forbids it so we can’t.
Amruta pills for #5561BCE supporters:
Q5: When does the AV observation become a Nimitta? (Using 5561BCE theory reference itself)
Option 1: In the 3067BCE time frame when V ahead of A normally?
Option 2: in the 5561BCE timeframe when A ahead of V normally?
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.
