Thread by @likeitmatters3

Anjali retweeted James A Conrad confirming she was examined by EMTs at a mountain home on Jan 21, 2018, the date of her experience.
#ufotwitter
This THREAD is about how one Wayne became...

I said there was one Wayne – I was wrong.

James found a possible Wayne in Sep '21. We researched details from Anjali’s story and I told Steven Cambian, who called him. Anjali appeared to confirm to Steven it was the right Wayne.

The matching bio details are coincidences.

The irony isn’t lost on me that recently someone matched me to a prominent skeptical Aussie based on matching bio details.

The difference? I told the truth about me. And I’m nobody, rather than someone who holds the key to humanity’s salvation. Anyway…

When you hold a “press” conference about an ET base in a mountain, it's hardly surprising that:
- if we think it could be true, we want to find it!
- if we think it’s not true, we want to find out why someone (former defense blah-di-blah or any person really) says it’s true.

I just spoke about people who don’t play along.
What about those who do?

When Anjali says “Charlie and others”, she’s ignoring that I:
- didn't find notWayne
- didn't call him
- didn't release his file
- didn't dox him

Who did?
James A Conrad
Steven Cambian
Scott Browne

Steven C explains he dismissed Anjali’s whole story only to discover Wayne was real.
Verifying Wayne was the ONLY evidence for her experience and she let him believe and promote it, accepting his profuse apology and thanking him with a 🙏 and a😊

Scott B sent notWayne’s file to a bully/liar who then claimed to fly drones and interview him (didn’t happen, remember), allegedly spooking theWayne into nixing the expedition.
Scott spoke notWayne’s full name on air and tweeted it, and only deleted it when I suggested he should.

James found notWayne, which ultimately ended humanity’s chance for irrefutable evidence of Anjali’s stuck-in-a-mountain higher beings of love n light.

She used him to validate her ENTIRE experience, contrary to his explicitly stated intent:

Anjali praises these guys despite their actions, puts 2 on her poll, because she could twist their skepticism to her benefit.
I respect them too, and worked a little or a lot with each of them.
Yet by their actions THEY ARE 3/4ths THE REASON YOU’RE PROBABLY NOT GONNA TRANSCEND.

Meanwhile I get threatened (as a growth experience) for recording & organizing Anjali’s own words, asking her to correct errors (she blocked me instead), and outlining her inconsistencies and repeated failures to produce… anything.

ALL while giving her the benefit of the doubt:

Nevertheless, I was wrong about Wayne. Sorry for misleading you.

I assumed Anjali truthfully confirmed Wayne to Steven, and later lied in saying we had the wrong guy.
In fact, she lied to Steven, and later truthfully said it was the wrong guy.

I went into this assuming Anjali was telling the truth, as she perceived it, in her initial post & interviews.
Given the admitted lies and lack of transparency since, I now view every aspect of the story differently.

This was the appetizer.
I’ll have more to say VERY SOON.
/END