1/ "Ct-value cut-off for sample positivity was set <40 for both targets or at <33 if only one target was positive."
What? Single tragets even!?
Where is the calibration data from NL? And why is the German one removed? @P_Bruijning
2/ Germany removed PCR ring calibration results. The web archive has it.
web.archive.org/web/2021010308…
It looked too disturbing. 93%. Note the single target "performance" here below.
files.catbox.moe/wvq2at.pdf
3/ Germany removed the PCR calibration results after this article.
correctiv.org/faktencheck/hi…
From NL, there is nothing. A scandal considering that we are imprisoned based on this "test" without legal options to even get raw data from calibrations.
4/ According to NL #RIVM, a PCR test is negative, if at 40-45 there isn’t a signal??
No wonder that we have an apparent “invisible” spreading illness in NL.
FOIA here:
5/ After 2 years, the Dutch harassment of children is not supposed to end it seems. Related, this article where they used "models" to justify child vaccinations. The argument (we know it's false now): to protect others. Fantasy models.
6/ How wrong the NL modelling is, can be seen from the December lockdown (the only country in the world). Thanks to fake science.
NL praises having "the best scientists TM in the world". 👉NOPE
From DNK modelling group we how crazy the NL ones are. 👉
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.