@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s I thought i saw this study before, took me forever, but of course was just same authors! I hate these unnecessarily complicated papers that play around with putting people into diff categories instead of following stable groups of people over time.
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s israel data seems to love that crap since they did that for their myocarditis from vax is less bad than from infection overhyped paper: where in reality they did NOT properly distinguish between myo due to V, myo due to CV, & myo due to just C (no vax)
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s Read those convoluted ways of messing with the data (screenshits above)! Check those exclusions! Sometimes simple is best, but not when your data is so bad you need to do everything u can to make sure it fits with pre-conceived hypothesis & even then they struggle!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s You can tell this study is crap when they discuss how clearly C is better but u can "reverse" that effect by adding more V lol the study literally shows incredible protection all clearly driven/underpinned by natural infection & thus they conclude vax more?!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s Also who the hell cares anymore about infections? Pardon the language but reading crap makes me irritable. They could NOT properly analyze cases of severe covid because they were too LOW! How is this not front page news?! With the highest being in the 2 dose category!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s All 0.4-0.6 & then 4.6 in 2 dose! What the hell?! Also 0.4 in 3 dose is probably just those healthy & stupid enough to move onto 3rd dose! Nevermind their high possibilities of misclassifying groups leading to 10-20% underestimates! Enough to seriously undermine their results!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s Back to severe C: Why do the #s of 2 dose people getting severe covid just keep increasing in time?! Why 60+ 3 dose people still in >100 cases of severe covid, we started with 16 at 2 months with dose 2, meanwhile the unvaxed #s are always <5!!! Where is the miracle?!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s Why do they stupidly include months 8-12 for unvaxed? Why even include it if no proper comparison? Why such hard to compare misleading graphics? Are they laughing at us all? Whats up with those HUGE variations in hybrid immunity?!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s Do you see something special here? Cuz i see Booooring! The only interesting thing in this entire paper is when they note that many infections were with original wuhan variant!
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s So this means that for failing vax immunity: it has nothing to do with the fact that it's based on an old variant (going on year 3 wow), & everything to do with the fact we've been sold a shitty ineffective & maybe even dangerous (for some) product.
@orwell2022 @Immetjes @MinVWS @connolly_s go back to my 1rst tweet in this thread: same authors are now using 4th dose as internal control with 1rst week after 4th being worst of all! This would be unbelievably hilarious if it wasn't so serious with anxious people running after shots without the proper informed consent
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.