Philipp Heimberger Profile picture
Researcher, Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (@wiiw_ac_at); macroeconomics, economic policy, public finance, political economy.

Jun 21, 2022, 6 tweets

"๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น fails to do structural reforms to calm investors."

This ignores major rounds of labour market deregulation since early 1990s with contested macro effects. Furthermore, ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น has committed to "structural reforms" with Next Gen EU. "Homework" language remains divisive. #CAIN ๐Ÿงต

Italy has carried out many market-liberal reforms. Labour market flexibilisation brought a sharp increase in fixed-term contracts and a decline in real wages. However, these structural reforms have failed to boost Italy's productivity growth.

Labour market liberalisation generated temporary jobs. However, cheap labour reduced real wages and diminished incentives for companies to make labour-saving investments โ€“ with dampening effects on productivity, which is the basis for long-term growth.

Italy has adhered more closely to the EUโ€™s "structural reform" policy rulebook than Germany or France. But instead of asking what impact these reforms have had, we keep hearing the same false refrain ("Reform-lazy Italy!").

tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.108โ€ฆ

Furthermore, Italy has committed to major reforms for receiving money from Next Gen EU (justice, public administration, public procurement etc.). One can have different opinions on the merits of these reforms, but one cannot seriously claim that there are no reform efforts in ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น.

The ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น government should not be be forced to calm investors in government bond markets by certain market-liberal reforms; this does not work. This is not about reforms but about โ‚ฌzone institutional structures - and an ECB backstop - to prevent self-fulfilling market sentiments.

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling