Crypto Bridges ๐ solve one of the fundamental problems of blockchains:
#INTEROPERABILITY โ
However, theft from cross-chain bridges totaled more than $1 BILLION in 2022
Here's a thread that will help you understand the RISKS
associated with cross-chain bridges:
๐งต
First, bridges are used to transfer assets and data back & forth between multiple #blockchains
A specific blockchain asset is incompatible with other blockchains due to differing designs
So, bridges create WRAPPED assets that represent the asset from the original blockchain
Bridges use a LOCK-MINT-BURN mechanism: ๐ฅ
1. Users deposit their funds into a bridge smart contract
2. The contract locks the deposited assets & mints the equivalent amount of WRAPPED assets on the specified chain
3. The WRAPPED asset is pegged 1:1 to the original asset
The user can once again deposit the WRAPPED asset into the bridge smart contract & unlock their original assets
This is how Bridges accomplish INTEROPERABILITY โ
If the future is #multichain, cross-chain bridges will become a NECESSITY
But it is incredibly hard to build a SAFE cross-chain bridge
Here are some of the risks involved in cross-chain bridges:
1. CUSTODIAN RISK:
โข Some bridges rely on one or a small set of validators who are responsible for communicating the state of blockchains
โข Since they are the custodians, they control the LOCK-MINT-BURN mechanism
So a small set of individuals can steal all the deposited assets if they wish to
โข Vitalik says "It's a lot easier to attack a bridging protocol's 19-node validator set than an L1's 30,000 nodes"
2. CONTAGION RISK:
โข The locked assets on the bridge contract are vulnerable to the security risks of the other chain
โข As a result, attacking one chain would also affect the bridged assets on the other chain
โข So, bridges compound the risk between sovereign chains
3. POOR LIQUIDITY:
โข A cross-chain bridge must have deep liquidity pools on both chains to offer low slippage
โข But it is difficult to sustain deep liquidity pools for a long period of time
โข In order to do so, the bridge has to be a MOAT which is also difficult
4. CENSORSHIP RISK:
โข The native assets on a #blockchain are censorship-resistant which means no third party has control over your assets & the activities you wish to perform on the blockchain
โข Since bridges rely on custodians they have control over the locked assets
โข This signifies that one has to trust the custodian to burn/ mint tokens & ultimately you lose control over your native assets until you bring them back to the blockchain
โข Additionally, the bridged assets are also at risk if the custodians lose their private keys
Despite the risks involved, bridge protocols have a TVL of $10B & are ranked 3rd among all DeFi protocols
This shows that there is a market demand for a flawed product
So, understanding the risks involved can be helpful to look for protocols that try to reduce those risks
We hope you've found this thread on crypto cross-chain bridges ๐ helpful.
Follow @Momentum_6 for more insightful threads and analysis on the fast paced crypto space
Please help share this thread by hitting Like/Retweet on the original tweet:
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.