Some are starting to see it!
Wait until they realize it means not just former Presidents but former Secretaries of State & other roles!
#ButNothingsHappening
web.archive.org/web/2023040200…
If you read my thread the other day, you will see the New York Times is allowing this former prosecutor to raise issue with the same things I said were the goal. To open up others for state prosecutions...
Lots of novel legal issues for the courts to resolve!
Based on a case so weak that it will never get to a conviction but will serve as precedent for prosecuting others for their crimes!
Huh, seems we will be seeing many of these cases now that the precedent is set!
So local prosecutors where the 40 state Democratic Party organiziations or their banks have offices will all have jurisdiction for Hillary's $83M money laundering operation.
Imagine local prosecutors picking every Swamp creature & then looking for their crimes!
Yes, I can imagine that...
So it may mean an end to the days where some federal official can protect a politician or former politician from prosecution for a state crime.
That seems important...
Former officials could conduct their crimes in states where partisans would protect them from prosecution....
Or former officials could avoid committing Swampy crimes.
The rule of law requires prosecution of criminal actions.
It shouldn't be a partisan activity, nor should crimes be ignored because of partisanship (as suggested above).
But this author is warning the Uniparty to negate this Trump prosecution before the constituents demand more!
The $83M case of DNC money laundering that FEC ignored in a 2-2 vote, like the Stormy settlement, accused them of laundering money in up to 40 states.
The 38 states below were listed by name & any could investigate these crimes.
#ButNothingsHappening!
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.