The "Impossible Mandate" (How SAUSA Corinne Lambert is Criminalizing Survival)
What Lambert does is pure cruelty.
The Argument: She argued my 100% disabled veteran husband, Conrad Rockenhaus, should be imprisoned for failing to pay restitution.
The Trap: She simultaneously prosecuted him for "unauthorized device use" (his work iPhone), the only tool he had to earn the money to pay that restitution.
The Result: Lambert created a "Catch-22" where my husband was guilty if he worked (device violation) and guilty if he didn't (restitution violation). She engineered his failure.
September 19, 2025 at 10:01 AM.
I notified Lambert's office that FCI Milan had just administered a lethal overdose to my husband.
Her Action: Nothing.
The Meaning: A prosecutor who is told "The prison is killing my husband" and does nothing is not "busy."
They are complicit. Lambert's silence was a green light for the abuse to continue.
@threadreaderapp unroll
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.