The "Impossible Mandate" (How SAUSA Corinne Lambert is Criminalizing Survival)
What Lambert does is pure cruelty.
The Argument: She argued my 100% disabled veteran husband, Conrad Rockenhaus, should be imprisoned for failing to pay restitution.
The Trap: She simultaneously prosecuted him for "unauthorized device use" (his work iPhone), the only tool he had to earn the money to pay that restitution.
What Lambert does is pure cruelty.
The Argument: She argued my 100% disabled veteran husband, Conrad Rockenhaus, should be imprisoned for failing to pay restitution.
The Trap: She simultaneously prosecuted him for "unauthorized device use" (his work iPhone), the only tool he had to earn the money to pay that restitution.
The Result: Lambert created a "Catch-22" where my husband was guilty if he worked (device violation) and guilty if he didn't (restitution violation). She engineered his failure.
September 19, 2025 at 10:01 AM.
I notified Lambert's office that FCI Milan had just administered a lethal overdose to my husband.
Her Action: Nothing.
I notified Lambert's office that FCI Milan had just administered a lethal overdose to my husband.
Her Action: Nothing.
The Meaning: A prosecutor who is told "The prison is killing my husband" and does nothing is not "busy."
They are complicit. Lambert's silence was a green light for the abuse to continue.
They are complicit. Lambert's silence was a green light for the abuse to continue.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
