This is a thread about fairy rings and Cletus the Slack-jawed Yokel.
Fairy rings are the circles of mushrooms you sometimes see in lawns, forests and meadows. They're pretty striking, and there are a lot of old folktales attributing them to fairies, elves and witches. One Dutch folk tale has it that these rings are where the Devil churns his milk.
The modern understanding is less mystical but still worth geeking out over. Fairy rings grow in a circle because all the mushrooms are part of the same fungus. Underground, they're all connected.
(photo by Eric Albrecht)
The mushrooms are the fruiting bodies of a single fungal mass. Underground is the mycelium, there even when there aren't mushrooms at the surface. You can think of the mycelium as the plant and the mushrooms as its fruit.
Fungal fairy rings sometimes show up as a particularly lush or poor circle of lawn grass, without the mushrooms. A more prosaic examples of this tip-of-the-iceberg phenomenon is bread mold. By the time you see the mold on the surface, the inside can be riddled with mycelia. Yum.
I started thinking about fairy rings as #MeToo stories started flooding forth and Nazis crawled out onto the pages of the New York Times. It's like they were all there just under the surface, waiting for the right conditions to bring them out.
What really reminded me of fairy rings was all the people saying "I can't believe how bad it was”. The phrase "hidden in plain sight" kept coming up. A lot of men and a lot of white people were blind to the full extent of the problem until these glaring examples burst into view.
And like each mushroom in a ring, these incidents aren't independent. They're the symptom, not the cause. Each incident is rooted in the sexism and bigotry that riddles America like mycelia in an old loaf of bread.
The people committing these acts were supported and enabled by the people and institutions around them, which were in turn shaped by a society that tells men/white people we're better and deserve better.
These people acted according, abusing the power they were given or lashing out when they didn't get the power they felt entitled to. These behaviors are inevitable results of that message. They're the poisonous fruiting bodies at the tip of the mycelium.
The most important thing about this metaphor? It shouldn't work. With fairy rings, the connections and support systems are literally underground. Solid dirt blocks them from our view. Here they're out in the open. They're hidden in plain sight, which is to say not hidden at all.
So for those of us who've been surprised by any of this, one of the most important challenges we face is figuring out how it’s stayed hidden in plain sight. What are the aspects of our society and psychologies that obscure certain things that are right in front of our face?
Until we figure that out, we're part of the problem. To push the metaphor, our blindness to systemic sexism and racism is itself a part of the mycelium. The blindness leads to complacency and denial, and in a million ways big and small makes us complicit.
So we need to take a look at the things we do to stay blind. Things like:
- dismissing an endless stream of white male shooters as "lone wolves"
- focusing on exceptions (like black or female CEOs) to dismiss the big picture
- not listening to the targets of racism and sexism
- thinking America is reasonably fair because it feels that way to you
- kneejerk rejection of the possibility we have racist or sexist tendencies
- treating racists as "other", as a thing or group distant from ourselves
Which brings me to this guy. Good ol' Cletus, the Simpsons' over-the-top stereotype of The Hick.
When white people talk about racists, we love to picture people like Cletus. But it's not true. Just as an example, Trump got the vote of most Republican. He won a majority of men, whites, people making over 50k/yr, and suburb dwellers. He won with Ward, not Cletus.
(“But voting for Trump doesn't make you racist.” If you voted for him in spite of his openly white supremacist campaign, then you used white supremacy as a vehicle to reach other goals. Still racist. And if you were blind to his racism, you were blind to yours too.)
We play this game all the time. We let ourselves off the hook by saying someone else- someone like Trump or poor Cletus- is the real racist. Hell, we've even let Trump a little off the hook sometimes, by scapegoating Bannon or Miller or Sessions. "The problem is… that guy!"
It's the same with sexism. Plenty of the people making Handmaid's Tale references about Mike Pence said Hillary was too power-hungry in 2016, and don't see the common thread of keeping women "in their place". Sexism is something other people do. Villains like Pence and Weinstein.
But if you're a privileged person pointing a finger at Weinstein or Trump, without confronting your own role in the system that produced them, you're like a part of the mycelium tsking the mushroom above you.
I don't know you, maybe you're just a nice slice of bread or patch of lawn. This is Twitter, so maybe you're a fruiting body. But if you enjoy some kind of privilege, the odds are good you're part of the mycelium. And we shouldn't assume we aren't.
I’m thinking one way white people could show our gratitude is, we could all stop being the reason we came so close to (at least) four more years of total fascism.
No knock on giving credit where it’s due. I just need to hear the logic expressed in the other direction too. Vote like black women, yeah, but also, don’t vote like white guys because that demographic has an affinity for fascist con artists.
We can’t use our displays of gratitude to let ourselves off the hook from explicitly holding ourselves and the white people around us accountable.
Seems like it should be a bigger story that the current occupant of the White House has been illegally running a covert propaganda effort against the American public and is now doing so to help his campaign.
Republicans keep being massive hypocrites, and the press keeps letting them get away with it, because neither wants to admit the GOP’s real motivation is to maintain rich, straight, white Christian male supremacy.
If they actually cared about religious freedom, law and order, small government, or the Merrick Garland “rule”, they wouldn’t support the Muslim Ban, a serially criminal president*, concentration camps or ACB.
But they can’t openly say what they really want is a rigged system.
Lucky for them, the press doesn’t really want to talk about their hypocrisy. The press has almost as little interest in honest talk about rich, straight white Christian male supremacy as the GOP does.
If you're going to complain about "cancel culture", how do you define it?
Does it apply to online criticism? Losing a gig after a racist rant or ten? Getting ostracized for sexual harassment? Getting arrested for rape?
Does it distinguish between punching up and punching down?
Looking at these discussions through the lens of punching up vs punching down is clarifying. Most arguments against "political correctness", "incivility" and "cancel culture" are just attempts to stop punching up and defend punching down. Defending abuse from a high horse.
The phrase "punching up" is really suboptimal here.
Punching down has real consequences for the target. Punching up usually has few consequences. That's how power dynamics work. It's usually just complaining about abuse. In rare cases, it means consequences for abuse.
I'm sure people will accuse Princeton of "erasing history". That's backwards. Keeping Wilson's name meant ignoring the facts that disqualified him from the honor. Acknowledging history is the opposite of erasing it.
What they call erasing history is always really just people removing the whitewash. And it's striking how many public monuments and history books this applies to. Wilson, Columbus, Confederate generals, Jefferson, Washington...
The "erasing history" argument has a lot of problems, not least of which is that it's stupid. It's not like this erases Wilson from history textbooks. If monuments were simply how we learn about history, we'd need a hell of a lot more statues. With placards. Long placards.