There are a lot of misconceptions about sunscreen and whether or not dark-skinned people need to wear it to prevent skin cancer. This NPR piece does a POOR job presenting the actual evidence. I think a TWEETORIAL is in order.
Melanoma is a potentially deadly form of skin cancer that has been linked to over exposure to UV rays from the sun. Thus, the promotion of sunscreen as an effective intervention to prevent melanoma is a reasonable public health message.
While this may be true for fair-skinned patients, i.e. white people, this is NOT the case for dark-skinned people, i.e. most black and brown people.
To be sure, dark-skinned people can also develop melanoma. However, in the United States, melanoma is 20 to 30 times more common among whites compared to blacks.
In the same way men can develop breast cancer but nobody with a brain is out here advocating we screen asymptomatic men for breast cancer. The risks are just way different to merit such an intervention.
Reducing the small risk of developing melanoma in dark skinned people even further with sunscreen is unlikely. Even among white people in the only RTC evaluating sunscreen for melanoma reduction, the absolute risk reduction was small.
This sunscreen RTC was also done in Queensland, Australia which has the highest melanoma rate in the world!!! So, if there was to be a large observable effect it would be in this population. Also, there were ZERO black people in this study.
In dark skinned patients, melanoma usually develops on parts of the body that get less sun exposure such as the palms of the hands and soles of the feet. Therefore, sunscreen will do NOTHING to reduce the risk of these cancers.
When was the last time you saw a sunburn on the palms/soles? 🤔
But what about Bob Marley! He died from melanoma! Yea, he died from an acral melanoma on his toe, sunscreen would NOT have helped.
Dermatologists will point out that black patients tend to show up to the doctor with later stage melanoma and have lower survival rates, which is true. But that has nothing to do with sunscreen application!!! These are two separate issues!!!
Also, if sunscreen was important in the prevention of melanoma in dark-skinned patients, then why have we never heard of an epidemic of sun-induced melanoma in sub-Saharan Africa, a region with intense sun, a lot of dark-skinned people, and little sunscreen? 🤔
If you have dark skin sunscreen may help reduce freckling, sunburns, wrinkles, which are all worthwhile, but reducing your risk of melanoma, unlikely.
As dermatologists/physicians, we can do a better job educating patients about the risk of skin cancer, without promoting a fear-mongering public health message that is not grounded in evidence.
Here we have the opportunity to tailor the appropriate intervention to the appropriate patients. I think #PrecisionMedicine twitter would like that.
@VinayPrasadMD's recent fantastic tweetorials inspired to do another one.
Was this tweetorial helpful?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ade Adamson, MD MPP

Ade Adamson, MD MPP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdeAdamson

Jan 7, 2021
This tweet got a bit derailed by the attempted coup yesterday...but Gil Welch, @BenMazer and me in this week's @NEJM where we explain how UV exposure CAN'T explain the rapid rise in melanoma which is likely an epidemic of diagnosis and NOT disease nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… THREAD👇🏾
I’m somewhat nervous about the reaction from dermatologists (i.e. my medical tribe). But here goes nothing…let’s dive right in!
Relative to 1975, the incidence of cutaneous melanoma has increased SIX-FOLD! This is in contrast to non-cutaneous melanoma (e.g. ocular, oral, nasal, anal) which has been stable. For context, thyroid cancer is 3 times as high and breast cancer 1.5 times as high.
Read 31 tweets
Dec 16, 2020
Last year the @TODAYshow said I was wrong about sunscreen and skin cancer in Black people. Here is our latest publication in @JAMADerm showing why I was right.
Let me explain.... Image
It all started with this article I wrote in the @washingtonpost challenging the idea that sunscreen would have saved Bob Marley who died of melanoma on his foot.
People seemed to be blown away by the assertion and it ended up getting picked up by the NYTimes here: nytimes.com/2019/07/26/us/…
Read 12 tweets
Jan 21, 2020
Effect of Sunscreen Application on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active Ingredients: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/… PART-2 of a study on chemical sunscreen absorbing into the blood. This is surely going to stir up more controversy. Let me break it down in this thread #tweetorial 👇🏾
In May 2019 the same group of investigators published a study in @JAMA_current asking the question: What is the concentration of chemical sunscreen that gets in the blood if used under maximal conditions (i.e. Used 4 times per day for 4 days)? Study here: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
I did a #tweetorial last year on the original study and explained the history of the controversy of sunscreen safety in general:
Read 18 tweets
Dec 11, 2019
Machine Learning and the Cancer-Diagnosis Problem — No Gold Standard: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
My latest work in @NEJM with Dr. Gil Welch in which we discuss how machine learning cannot overcome a central problem in cancer diagnosis and we suggest a way forward. #tweetorial 👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾
Machine learning (ML) is a potential powerful tool that may help clinicians deliver faster and more consistent diagnoses and improve patient care. But there are inherent limitations.
So far, most applications of ML in medicine are for visual recognition (e.g. retinal scans, chest x-rays) developed using “supervised learning,” meaning you present the computer with the ground truth and after thousands/millions of data points it gets good at recognizing “truth”
Read 14 tweets
Oct 2, 2019
What are the Epidemiologic Signatures in Cancer? A new special report out in NEJM by Gil Welch, Barnett Kramer, and William Black is so good I had to do a #tweetorial. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾
TL;DR -- The MAJOR takeaway doctors and trainees should get from this article is this:
Cancer incidence is an UNRELIABLE measure of cancer burden.
Using data from SEER, which essentially serves as the cancer registry of the United States, authors show trends in cancer mortality, incidence, and metastatic incidence between 1975 and 2015.
Read 29 tweets
Jul 23, 2019
Skin cancer better diagnosed by deep learning than doctors aiin.healthcare/topics/diagnos… Press releases like these really irritate me.
Let’s a take a dive into this study. Here is a link to it: ejcancer.com/article/S0959-…
First of all, this study was not about skin cancer writ large, but about melanoma, specifically. I think that’s an important distinction.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(