As I noted here, John Tower had grown up as a Democrat, but then switched to the Republican Party and won office as a Texas senator in 1961. He then firmly stood with the Dixiecrats to oppose civil rights:
As I noted here, Trent Lott served as a top aide to a prominent segregationist Democrat, Rep. William Colmer, who handpicked Lott as his successor but told him the time had come to switch to the GOP. Lott did just that.
And last but not least, Jesse Helms served as the campaign strategist and later chief of staff to segregationist Democrat Senator Willis Smith, won office himself as a segregationist Democrat but then later ran as a Republican for the Senate himself:
Now, D'Souza claims none of these racist Southern Democrats who switched to the Republicans really count as party switchers.
Moving the goalposts, he says it only counts if they were elected to Congress as a Dem and then switched to the GOP, which almost never happened.
But look at who D'Souza does count as a "Dixiecrat" -- W. Kerr Scott of North Carolina.
When Scott was in the Senate, yes, he backed the Southern Manifesto and voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act. Absolutely.
BUT!
When the actual Dixiecrat revolt unfolded, W. Kerr Scott fought against them.
He was part of the NC machine that kept Dixiecrats off the ballot in the state, and as governor, he appointed racial liberal Frank Porter Graham to an empty Senate seat:
The same people who have been saying “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” nonstop for decades are somehow baffled by “highways aren’t racist, but highway planners can be racist”
Also, this argument suggests that federal policy was once not “woke” and perhaps even racist and, huh, I wonder if there’s a theory to analyze that
In 1922, Klan leaders (including N.B. Forrest) announced plans for a new University of America.
They said the new college would focus on teaching Christianity and a history that promoted "Americanism," in order to explain to students how "this is a white man's country."
Almost exactly a century ago -- from the Atlanta Constitution (2/5/1922)
Oh Lord, that's right -- the site they're discussing here is now a synagogue.
Twitter aside, I'm going to go with the time we went to Nobu for my birthday and David Hasselhoff was VERY LOUDLY holding court at the table next to us.
I was @kaj33’s faculty host when he got an honorary degree. I had all these questions about his activism but the seating arrangement meant I didn’t get a chance to talk much. When I did, I panicked and asked about the book tour he was on: “so, I guess you’ve been flying a lot?”
The nicest celebrities were probably @CobieSmulders and @TaranKillam, who we sat next to at the @iamsambee Not the WHCD event. Very nice, very normal, swapped kid pics. My only regret was not raving about TK’s Drunk History episode.
For all the article's claims that historians thought Biden would be another FDR, there's a link to a Doris Kearns Goodwin interview and ... that's it.
The take on the New Deal is wrong -- FDR wasn't laser focused on economic issues alone, but had programs for conservation, public power, the arts, etc. from the start.
If you’re wondering why this ad never mentions what the scary book was that she wanted to ban or what course it was used in, well, it was Toni Morrison’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Beloved and the class was senior-year AP English.
If you think your high school senior can’t handle college-level novels in a college-credit course, maybe he shouldn’t take Advanced Placement English?
A lot of people are embarrassed for her son, but (unless I’m mistaken) he seems to be a 27-year-old Republican Party lawyer so he’s probably fine with all this?