1.@TomFitton Look at page#6 of Wolfe Indictment scribd.com/document/38131… Look at page #83 of Page FISA Application. scribd.com/document/38438… Look at media who reported incorrect origination date of October 19, 2016 (Buzzfeed, WaPo, NYT); All used same sourcing:Wolfe leak to Watkins 
2.@TomFitton Original Page FISA application is 83 pages (w/ signature page). Look at how many text messages SSCI Director of Security James Wolfe sent Watkins immediately after he took custody of FISA application:
3. @TomFitton When Carter Page FISA application was sent to Judicial Watch and NYT [July 20, 2018] didn't you wonder why DNI sent the March 17th, 2017 *copy* of the *original* FISA application?
4. @TomFitton Didn't you wonder why all the dates were redacted in the July 20th, 2018 *FIOA fulfillment* submission by the DNI?
5. @TomFitton The answer is simple. The March 17th, 2017 FISA copy sent to the SSCI had an incorrect date of October 19th, 2016 as the origination date from the FISA court.
7. @TomFitton ODNI (Dan Coats) sent the SSCI (James Wolfe) a March 17th, 2017, FISC *copy* with an intentionally changed date of October 19th, 2016, in order to track the content if it was leaked to media.
8. @TomFitton That October 19, 2016, date then shows up in reporting: washingtonpost.com/world/national…
11. @TomFitton every outlet that used the October 19, 2016, origination date was using the James Wolfe leaked FISA Application he sent, via 82 picture text messages, to reporter Ali Watkins on March 17th, 2017.
12. @TomFitton why would James Wolfe take pictures of fully redacted pages?
Answer: He wouldn't.
Therefore the leaked 82 page FISA application sent to Ali Watkins was not redacted.
Answer: He wouldn't.
Therefore the leaked 82 page FISA application sent to Ali Watkins was not redacted.
13. @TomFitton Additionally, why would the ODNI redact the 82 pages on March 17, 2017, when the submission was only to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence?
All Committee Members have top level security clearances. No redaction of that copy would be required.
All Committee Members have top level security clearances. No redaction of that copy would be required.
14. @TomFitton So the version leaked by SSCI Security Officer James Wolfe, to reporter Ali Watkins, was almost certainly an unredacted copy.
15. That unredacted copy, containing the leak tracer (false date), was then shared by Ali Watkins in her own reporting and amid her close circle of reporters. Buzzfeed (her at the time), Washington Post and New York Times (where she arrived after Buzzfeed).
16. @TomFitton Which is why, Buzzfeed, The Washington Post, and The New York Times all used the wrong date: October 19, 2016, in their reporting.
17. @TomFitton that is also why Buzzfeed, The Washington Post, and The New York Times all likely have *unredacted* versions of the original Carter Page FISA application as it was leaked by James Wolfe to Ali Watkins.
19. Addendum: The reason for this is because @TomFitton can't see the forest through the trees. WATCH (prompted, just hit play):
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
