REVEALED: The unsealed transcripts from the Manafort case.

Did certain jurors have it out for Paul Manafort?

Was the media looking at confidential documents on the counsel's tables?

Thread. Image
8/10/18. The media/public was trying to break court rules and look at the lawyers' documents.

Judge: Don't try to come forward and look at what's on counsel's tables. That's happened. I've had that reported to me. Don't do that or "you'll be expelled from the courtroom." Image
8/10: Before the Gov't case had rested, one juror was claiming Manafort "couldn't have much to present."

Before Manafort had made the decision whether to present evidence. Image
This juror made it clear that she didn't feel that the defense really had anything to offer for the rest of the trial.

This was 9 days into the trial. The Govt was still presenting its case. Image
Judge: Have other jurors made similar remarks?

Juror: Similar, but not as -- not as clear as that was made to me. Image
Judge Ellis confronts the juror who made the comment. The juror evades.

Judge: Have you made any comments that would suggest you've made up your mind in this case?

Juror: "No, I don't think so." Image
Judge: I heard you made a comment that Manafort hasn't presented any evidence and that you're unimpressed by the defense.

Juror: No. I think I said "it would be a tough job." ...

Judge: "And anything other than that?"

Juror: "No." Image
Judge: Did you say "The defendant has not present any evidence and I am unimpressed?"

Juror: "I don't recall, but I mean -- what I meant was that it would be really hard to have to defend against that."

(Editorial: She sounds like she's lying to the court.) Image
Judge Ellis then has the juror understand that Manafort has the presumption of evidence, etc. Image
How did the Court respond to this situation?

8/14: Judge proposed bringing in the jurors one by one and making sure they can do their job fairly and impartially. Image
First juror gets questioned.

Judge: "Have you heard any other jurors discuss the weight or effect of the evidence?"

Juror: "Not really." Image
The judge goes through and asks each juror if anyone has discussed the weight or effect of the evidence.

Each remaining juror says no.
At the same sealed hearing the Judge denies Manafort's motion for a mistrial. Image
8/15: Counsel for Manafort raises his motion that the juror be "excluded from the jury based on her lack of candor with the court"

The judge later denies that motion, noting the juror denials left him in a position "where I don't know who is dishonest"

But someone was dishonest ImageImage
Funny little sidebar on 8/17. Judge is given a document by the Govt.

Govt: We know how your Honor feels about highlighting.

Judge: When you give a highlighted document to the jury, "then you're arguing it." Image
3 days after the hearing where CNN/etc wanted the jurors names, the Judge says something very important:

The jurors were reluctant to present their questions in open court. Why?

"They can feel intimidated by the attention this case has received." Image
Manafort's lawyer: "I've done this for 21 years and I've never had this happen." (About jurors being reluctant.)

He uses that to ask for a retrial. Denied. ImageImage
And that's it.

Still redacted: juror names/IDs and the discussion of Rick Gates' time on the Trump inaugural committee (from which he supposedly embezzled).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Techno Fog

Techno Fog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Techno_Fog

29 Jan
We are live for the Kevin Clinesmith sentencing hearing.

Clinesmith is charged with altering an email - falsifying a document - in an effort to get the 4th Carter Page FISA warrant.

Judge Boasberg has entered the hearing.

Follow this thread for updates.
Judge starts by hearing from Carter Page:

The national media accused me of being "an agent of a foreign power"

I've been harassed in person.

"I know what it's like for your life to be destroyed"
Carter Page:

I first collaborated with the CIA while in the military. I never betrayed that trust.

My life "spun out of control" due to the false allegations.

I had "no privacy" - everything was monitored by the gov't

They physically searched my belongings and hotel room.
Read 14 tweets
17 Dec 20
Edward Snowden exposed the worst 4th Amendment violations in US history: the unlawful collection of data on millions of Americans.

His fight was on behalf of the American people.

For that @Snowden deserves a pardon from @realDonaldTrump Image
Recall what Snowden helped expose:

1) The illegal collection of metadata of millions of Americans

2) NSA plans to "Collect it All" and "Exploit it All"

3) Economic espionage and the abuse of private data ImageImageImage
Forget the clichés and talking points of pundits and gov't officials.

Instead, read the source documents hosted by @ggreenwald

They show the scope of domestic surveillance abuses and global US operations.

glenngreenwald.net/#BookDocuments Image
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec 20
The DOJ has filed its Kevin Clinesmith sentencing memo

They want incarceration.

DOJ: Clinesmith wasn't just altering e-mails - he was lying about Carter Page in DMs to the FBI agent.

Thread. ImageImageImage
Why the Clinesmith lie was material:

"It would raise the issue of whether [Carter Page] had those interactions with the intent to assist the US gov't."

It would go to the "loyalties" of Carter Page.

Clinesmith knew FISC needed to be informed.

@AWeissmann_ disagrees 🤦‍♂️ ImageImageImage
Clinesmith's lies "allowed the FBI to conduct surveillance" on @carterwpage thru a FISA application that "lacked probable cause"

He violated the duty of candor to the FISA court. ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct 20
We have Ghislaine Maxwell's unsealed deposition.

Question: Did you invite minor Virginia Giuffre to Epstein's home?

Maxwell: "She came as a masseuse."

Thread. Image
Ghislaine Maxwell admits that Epstein's masseuse was a minor.

Maxwell: "Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) who you are referring to was a masseuse aged 17."

Was [redacted girl] 13 years old when you met her?

Maxwell: "I have no idea." ImageImage
Maxwell evades the questions -

Question: Did the massage therapists "perform sexual acts for Jeffrey Epstein?"

Maxwell: "I don't know what you mean by sexual acts." Image
Read 6 tweets
7 Oct 20
DOJ produces new Flynn evidence - 1/25/17 Notes FBI OGC lawyer notes.

Logan Act: "no reasonable prosecutor" would proceed.

Flynn call w/ Kislyak similar to "other transition teams"

"First time to use [Logan Act]"

Thread. Image
TOP FBI lawyer James Baker:

"How do you assess § 1001 (false statements) when you wouldn't prosecute the underlying crime?"

Big concession that this wasn't about the broader Crossfile Hurricane investigation. Image
Assessment of whether Flynn is in a "covert relationship w/ Russia":

"No, probably not based on facts to date and interview."

Will be necessary to compare this to the Flynn NSLs handled by Clinesmith. Possible predication issues. (See pic) ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
25 Sep 20
🚨Flynn update - Interview 302 from FBI Agent William Barnett

"BARNETT believed the prosecution of FLYNN by SCO (Team Mueller) was used as a means to 'get Trump'"

Thread. Image
Agent Barnett was assigned to Crossfire Razor (the Flynn counter-intel investigation).

Barnett was later assigned to the Special Counsel team.

Barnett: the predication for the Flynn investigation was "not great" Image
Crossfire Hurricane source (likely Halper) accused Flynn of leaving a 2014 event with an undisclosed person.

Perhaps @RealSLokhova

FBI assessed this information to be not accurate Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!