RBI and SEBI say they're on the case. This is a good piece of news and I really don't want specifics. Here's why.
There's some fear of redemptions in mutual funds. Even MFs have to be able to sell to handle redemptions. They don;t have a lender of last resort who tehy can borrow from to tide over a temporary liquidity issue.
If the redemption pressure increases, RBI will open a line of credit - through banks - for mfs to borrow and use the bonds they have as collateral. HOwever they are expected to only take the highest rated paper initially - in a full blown crisis they will take more.
If people don't go nuts and redeem their ass off, then the system will stabilize. There isn't a massive problem other than in a few companies, and those companies are mostly not borrowing from the bond markets anyhow.
But a liquidity issue can cause solvency problems. Rolling over short term debt is a very important function of markets and rolls need to happen to keep eveyrone afloat. This concept of asset liability matching is mostly bookish - in reality, people withdraw when they want.
So the point of telling us that they are ready means this: RBI will provide liquidity (in the form of pass through credit - they have done this before) if needed. SEBI is likely to supress rules that require rating or anything else that prohibits buyers from the markets.
To be more specific is not possible. The debt markets have not seized up. Some stocks have fallen but that's not abnormal. Does RBI say they'll provide liquidity? Then there will be fear that liquidity is a problem (it's not, yet). So, the better option: Don't predict,react.
As market participants, this is where you will find opportunities. THis is not the time to EXIT debt markets, indeed it's time to consider getting in. DHFL for example has 9000 cr. of cash - and short term payouts are only 7000 cr. (not including bank credit lines available).
DHFL may not be the most pristine debt but at 12% it's quite attractive (and that's the kind of yield available in the market on Friday on the NSE). Let's hope that similarly, tax free bonds come back to 8% and so on.
Opportunities will only come if there is panic. At this point, what the regulators are saying is: If there is panic, we will act. If they act, we know markets are like babies with too much sugar -they will panic even more.
Eventually they'll come around - because of two things: the RBI/SEBI firepower is immense, and because we really don't have a solvency problem with a majority of the debt market.
You've just heard the regulators say "we've got your back". Call it a plunge protection team, or an "implicit put option" - but you have to wonder if the fear of a systemic meltdown is a really rational here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A 🧵on why Vaidy of IDFC First Bank would want to gift his house help shares. It's an interesting tax thing. And a way to get goodwill (though there are some negative points)
Context: this note by IDFC First Bank yesterday that said Vaidy has donated 900,000 shares to his house and office help, to help them buy houses:
Vaidy could have done it another way. Could have sold the shares, paid 10% tax on the profit and then pay the remaining to his help.
He'd also have to explain to hajaar people about why he did this, and then saying giving to help etc. sounds like a weak excuse (like "charity")
Means RBI will sell $5bn USD on March 10, 2022. It will also buyback $5bn USD on March 11, 2024, two years later.
Banks can say ok I want $100 USD and I will expect RBI to pay me back say Rs. 2.5 more after two years. That's the "auction" where banks will bid for the premium.
If I'm a bank I can borrow 100 USD at say Rs. 75 so I have to pay back 100 USD in two years, so how much rupees should I get? Effectively, I will quote the two year interest on the rupee - roughly 4.5% a year +/-some view on how the rupee will depreciate in the meantime.
The NSE Order is a crazy read. The juiciest bits have been discussed of course, but it's amazing how the largest stock exchange has been run. Disclosure: I own BSE, and I think SEBI should quickly level this field (the way they did when BSE was a near monopoly)
Chitra Ramakrishna was CEO between 2013 and 2016. A strange "yogi" was there. She shared confidential details of the NSE with this person:
The problem isn't the sharing, apparently. It involves another strange person: Anand Subramanian, a consultant at a Balmer Lawrie subsidiary, who was hired to become big ass consultant at NSE, with his salary going from 1cr+ to 4 cr+ per year between 2013 and 2016.
A thread 🧵on how much retail investors (individuals) dominate daily investing in the markets in India, from the NSE Pulse: static.nseindia.com//s3fs-public/i…
They're 41% of the stock market transactions - down from 45% in 2020-21. Still, massive.
Individuals are 29% of index futures - a big drop from 39% in FY 21 and give way to brokers (PRO).
They give way to FIIs and PRO in the stock futures segment, down to just 19% in FY22 (which is April 2021 to March 2022)
Crypto tax: All sales taxed at 30%. No deductions of brokerage etc. allowed. No set-off against any other losses allowed (Is this reading right: you can't even set off losses in other crypto transactions)
1% TDS by the seller on the transaction:
Wording might be
a) crypto against crypto is allowed due to phrase "aggregate of the income"
b) Brokerage could be allowed as cost of acquisition
Budget 2022: The Big Thread on all things that will be super important today! #Budget2022
Note: no investment advice. Large attempts at humour, not always successful. You've been warned.
cc @capitalmind_in
We start with markets, of course. Here's something to keep you occupied for the next 5 seconds: How markets reacted before, during and after budgets, since 2001:
India's tax rates across the years (I've only looked at personal tax rates)