1/ I've been at odds with some other $TSLAQ bears over the past day about the SEC settlement. Unlike some, I believe it's a good & fair settlement and a feather in @SEC_Enforcement's cap. Let me explain.
2/ The SEC's lawsuit was filed less than two months after the August 7 Musk tweet storm. In the intervening period, the SEC conducted a number of interviews & gathered & reviewed a number of documents that added much to what was known about the funding secured fiasco.
3/ All things considered, the SEC moved very rapidly with its investigation. And it wasted no time filing the suit once it was apparent Musk was walking away from a deal.
4/ You can't evaluate the settlement without considering both parts: settlement of the claims agains Musk and settlement of the claims against $TSLA.
5/ The scope of the released claims is narrow: only the funding secured issue & only on the civil side. Musk & $TSLA still face criminal jeopardy from the DOJ investigation of funding secured while the SEC continues investigating other potential securities law violations.
6/ Musk has to pay $20 million in fines. Many have complained that's only a tiny part of his net worth. But here's the dirty secret: his net worth is mostly paper. It's mostly just $TSLA stock.
7/ Musk can't sell that stock without creating huge downward price pressure. He borrows against it by pledging the stock. He's already borrowed at least $600MM and probably closer to $800MM.
8/ Now Musk will have to borrow $20MM more. And pay interest on that, too. Which, of course, means more borrowing. More stock pledges. More margin loans. It adds more danger to an already dangerous situation.
9/ Tesla also pays $20MM. Under GAAP, that should be a Q3 expense. (If any accountant has a different view about this, let's hear it.) So, in a quarter where $TSLA is straining to show a tiny GAAP profit, that's a material hit.
10/ $TSLA & Musk were required to agree to a number of big changes to Tesla governance. @cppinvest has outlined the changes in a great thread here.
11/ The SEC has to walk a fine line: policing corporate behavior while protecting investors. If you punish $TSLA too much, you punish its investors. These settlements, in my judgment, struck the right balance.
12/ Meanwhile, $TSLA has lots & lots of problems, and they continue to mount. @lorakolodny has a concise summary in this article. cnbc.com/2018/09/28/sec…
13/ Kolodny does not even mention the civil liability $TSLA & Musk face from private litigation arising out of the funding secured fiasco. The SEC lawsuit & judgments almost surely increased the settlement value of those private lawsuits.
14/ In sum, the SEC acted swiftly and decisively against $TSLA & Musk, and did so in a way that gives ample warning to investors & would-be investors.
15/ Yes, $TSLA lives on and Musk remains. But none of their problems have gone away. $TSLA remains structurally bankrupt. Both face many legal perils. And the financial train wreck continues. Better for the SEC to allow all those stories to play out in the course of time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Polixenes

Polixenes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Polixenes13

Sep 28, 2019
1/ A thread about $TSLA's release of Smart Summon. Which will conclude by answering this question: Why would Elon Musk unleash on the world a product that is so patently dangerous? $TSLAQ
2/ The web is now flooded with videos & written accounts demonstrating how stunningly dangerous Smart Summon is. I will offer a tiny sample in just a moment. But first this observation...
3/ Smart Summon is a stupid toy. The cars under its spell make their way across parking lots slowly, haltingly, much like, as some wag recently wrote, my 94-year-old grandfather before we took his car keys away...
Read 21 tweets
Sep 24, 2019
1/ Short thread with a warning to $TSLA's ABL lenders: you are now on notice that Elon Musk will shimmy his way around loan covenants when convenient. $TSLAQ
2/ After $TSLA's proposed acquisition of SolarCity was announced, Tesla and its secured revolving line lenders (under so-called ABL Agreement) amended the loan terms to allow the acquisition.
3/ But, the Fourth Amendment came with an important restriction: while $TSLA could downstream money to SolarCity, it could not guarantee any SolarCity obligations:
Read 8 tweets
Sep 17, 2019
26/ Kind readers, please find my first thread that ends with /25. Then pick it up here.
27/ The defamation lawsuit, Unsworth v Musk, is actually two lawsuits. One in the US suing for US damages. A second in the UK suing for the rest of the world? Why so complicated? I've explained it all before. Just, please, trust me, it enhances Unsworth's chances of max damages.
28/ The case was originally set for trial in October. Musk obtained an agreed continuance after he dismissed the Hueston law firm and engaged Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. A nastier bunch, but by no means smarter. Trial setting in December.
Read 19 tweets
Jul 29, 2019
1/ Short thread on land grant contract between $TSLA & Shanghai Planning and Land Resource Administration Bureau, divulged in 10-Q. Find it here: sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
2/ The contract was signed in December 2018. Why are we seeing it only now?
3/ As @orthereaboot has noted, $TSLA is obligated to make $2.11B in capital expenditures at the Shanghai factory between now and 12/12/2023. Given Tesla's Cap Ex parsimony, $420MM per year in Cap Ex is a significant burden.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 29, 2019
1/ Very short thread on today's Adam Jonas $TSLA note, as I'm taking lots of incoming, including from the formidable artillery of @markbspiegel.
2/ Jonas took a meat cleaver to his $TSLA revenue forecasts. Slashed 2019 revenue by $1.06B. Slashed 2020 revenue by $1.63B.
3/ He also slashed EPS forecasts. Jonas sees a GAAP 2019 loss of $8.94. And, very worst of all, for 2020, he went from positive 32 cents a share to negative $3.39 a share.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 25, 2019
1/ The social scientist in me is always curious to observe mob behavior. There's no mob quite like Elon's Flying Monkeys & there are few people they love to hate on more than @WSJ's talented @CGrantWSJ. Let's peek at the goons in their natural habitat after Grant's latest. $TSLAQ
2/ Here's a link to the Heard on the Street piece Grant wrote yesterday evening in the wake of the $TSLA Q2 financial data. wsj.com/articles/tesla…
3/ A hard-hitting headline. And four crucial points: First, despite deliveries exceeding Q4 number, revenues fell relative to Q4.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(