Full backstory on the nature of their relationship, network and time together in Delaware July 26th through August 7th. [Wrote DiFi Letter on July 30th] theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/chr…
Yet for some reason, even though her BFF (Monica McLean) was a career DOJ lawyer inside the FBI, who likely helped her write the DiFi letter, Ms. Blasey-Ford told congress she was struggling to understand complexities in needing a lawyer etc.? What a con.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1) Riddle me this... If Biden Inc are so worried about Russia-Ukraine causing horrible spike in energy costs (gas etc.) then why would they simultaneously be cancelling Oil/Gas leases?
(2) I'm trying to wake people up, by asking a simple rhetorical question.
The answer is.. If Biden admin believed the message they are promoting, they would NOT be crushing U.S. energy development *and* simultaneously confronting Russia-Ukraine, while claiming worry about energy
(3) The reality is... The ideological team behind Biden are using Russia-Ukraine as a cover to conflate the outcomes of their own Climate Change policy agenda.
1/ All the operations inside Ukraine are coordinated, planned and carried out by U.S. intel and State Dept.
Everything they are doing is a pantomime. Previously done in Libya and most comparable recently, northern Syria.
They also want to remove Zelensky.
2/ The weird part is... Zelensky knows this.
As he pointed out today, if the U.S. knows Russia is going to invade Ukraine, with such specificity as proclaimed within their assuredness, then why is the U.S. waiting to trigger sanctions?
3/ If the invasion by Vladimir Putin is a foregone conclusion, then why wait with these sanctions designed to deter him?
What Zelensky is doing is calling the bluff. But notice he's not calling Putin's bluff. He's calling Biden's.
Just throwing out stuff for dot connectors on the Rodney Joffe, Neustar, White House EOP data access issues from timeline. Durham notes Joffe contract beginning 2014. Now consider...
2. The question we should ask is what is Durham doing when he encounters an outside person who uses their knowledge of institutional action as a defense?
What evidence exists in the Durham sphere where he is targeting a person who we know has direct shield by DC involvement?
3. The reference for this type of analysis is found specifically in the way James Wolfe was treated. Wolfe was protected by the people who directed his unlawful conduct, the intelligence leaks.
That's why joyless people who believe in leftist ideologies seek govt control as a means of trying to create guarantees and safeguards against those circumstances they fear.
Trying to control others does nothing in the way of making oneself happy. By extension, voting in this mindset so that government can try to control others will also – shocking – not lead to a happier, more comfortable life.
The conservative (moderate, independent, but for the sake of expediency, conservative), on the other hand, relies on himself to meet his own needs. And the tradeoff for being free to live his life as he wishes is understanding that he has to make peace with how you live yours.