Well, well, well. Look who attended the hearing with Christine Blasey-Ford. That would be retired FBI agent and life long bestie, Monica Lee McLean.

[Hearing Video at 18:04]->
😉Reference for visual citation.

capegazette.com/article/teller…
Full backstory on the nature of their relationship, network and time together in Delaware July 26th through August 7th. [Wrote DiFi Letter on July 30th] theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/chr…
Yet for some reason, even though her BFF (Monica McLean) was a career DOJ lawyer inside the FBI, who likely helped her write the DiFi letter, Ms. Blasey-Ford told congress she was struggling to understand complexities in needing a lawyer etc.? What a con.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TheLastRefuge

TheLastRefuge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLastRefuge2

Feb 22
(1) Riddle me this... If Biden Inc are so worried about Russia-Ukraine causing horrible spike in energy costs (gas etc.) then why would they simultaneously be cancelling Oil/Gas leases?

Yesterday. Follow link👇

msn.com/en-us/news/pol…
(2) I'm trying to wake people up, by asking a simple rhetorical question.

The answer is.. If Biden admin believed the message they are promoting, they would NOT be crushing U.S. energy development *and* simultaneously confronting Russia-Ukraine, while claiming worry about energy
(3) The reality is... The ideological team behind Biden are using Russia-Ukraine as a cover to conflate the outcomes of their own Climate Change policy agenda.

A policy agenda they want hidden from the masses.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 19
1/ All the operations inside Ukraine are coordinated, planned and carried out by U.S. intel and State Dept.

Everything they are doing is a pantomime. Previously done in Libya and most comparable recently, northern Syria.

They also want to remove Zelensky.
2/ The weird part is... Zelensky knows this.

As he pointed out today, if the U.S. knows Russia is going to invade Ukraine, with such specificity as proclaimed within their assuredness, then why is the U.S. waiting to trigger sanctions?
3/ If the invasion by Vladimir Putin is a foregone conclusion, then why wait with these sanctions designed to deter him?

What Zelensky is doing is calling the bluff. But notice he's not calling Putin's bluff. He's calling Biden's.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 14
Can anyone clarify the *exact* date of this email from CIA (Brennan) to Comey and Strzok?

Source:
foxnews.com/politics/dni-r…
FBI New York Field Office - Abedin/Weiner Laptop, Clinton Emails.

Laptop arrives Sept 26, 2016
Reviewed analyzed Sept 27, 2016

Source (page 274)

scribd.com/document/38180…
Strzok in DC notified by McCabe Sept 28, 2016

Source: Page/Strzok Texts
Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
1. Everything Durham does is to frame the investigative findings as if the CIA, DOJ, FBI et al were duped by outside govt entities.

He provides cover for DC corruption by carefully building his case(s) in such a manner as DC officials are never touched.
2. The question we should ask is what is Durham doing when he encounters an outside person who uses their knowledge of institutional action as a defense?

What evidence exists in the Durham sphere where he is targeting a person who we know has direct shield by DC involvement?
3. The reference for this type of analysis is found specifically in the way James Wolfe was treated. Wolfe was protected by the people who directed his unlawful conduct, the intelligence leaks.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 9
Yes, life is a scary unpredictable endeavor...

That's why joyless people who believe in leftist ideologies seek govt control as a means of trying to create guarantees and safeguards against those circumstances they fear.
Trying to control others does nothing in the way of making oneself happy. By extension, voting in this mindset so that government can try to control others will also – shocking – not lead to a happier, more comfortable life.
The conservative (moderate, independent, but for the sake of expediency, conservative), on the other hand, relies on himself to meet his own needs. And the tradeoff for being free to live his life as he wishes is understanding that he has to make peace with how you live yours.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(