STUDY: Trump’s phony caravan “crisis” consumed Wash. Post, NY Times
The papers have produced 115 news stories referencing the caravan, putting 25 on A1 mm4a.org/4G9
President Trump has taken Fox News’ advice and successfully turned the network’s fearmongering about an “invasion” by a caravan of migrants. The caravan is shrinking and weeks away, but Trump has been able to use his bully pulpit to move it to the top of the media agenda.
The individual articles are in many cases laudable -- compelling stories of the migrants themselves, debunk the president’s lies and conspiracy theories, and point to the facts that undermine his demagoguery.
But the sheer volume of the coverage can’t help but fuel Trump’s claims that the caravan’s approach represents a crisis and suck oxygen away from other stories in the lead-up to the midterm elections.
Resources are limited, and A1 space is precious, so papers have to prioritize. Column inches devoted to the caravan can’t be used to cover health care, or the social safety net, or Trump administration corruption.
And in the weeks leading up to the midterms, time and again, the story that got the most attention was the one the president wanted to get attention.
We saw a Republican manufactured crisis consume the press with Ebola in 2014.
Right before the 2016 election, it was Comey's email letter that became the overwhelming subject of discussion.
Editors and producers remain stymied by how to respond when political leaders seek to manipulate them in order to focus the public’s attention on the issues of their choice.
There's no caravan crisis. But I think there is a journalistic one. #fin
Had a labeling error on the Y-axis, going to tweet the charts again. Data is unchanged.
STUDY: Trump’s phony caravan “crisis” consumed Wash. Post, NY Times
The papers have produced 115 news stories referencing the caravan, putting 25 on A1 mm4a.org/4G9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You can see why Mitch McConnell didn't want to roll out a specific policy agenda, this Rick Scott document is fucking nuts politico.com/f/?id=0000017f…
"Socialism will be treated as a
foreign combatant which aims
to destroy our prosperity and
freedom" is either pure bluster or a call to imprison or assassinate a wide swathe of Americans based on their political beliefs.
The plain reading of "No government assistance unless you are disabled or aggressively seeking work" is the termination of Social Security -- or it's bullshit.
Cavuto was likely fighting for his life when Alex Berenson told Tucker Carlson's audience the "mRNA COVID vaccines need to be withdrawn from the market now. No one should get them. No one should get boosted. They are a dangerous and ineffective product." mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson…
And when Charlie Kirk told Tucker Carlson's audience that "COVID vaccines have caused “a 40 percent increase in death amongst the supposed healthiest portion of the American population" mediamatters.org/coronavirus-co…
And when Peter McCullough told Laura Ingraham's audience that children should not be given COVID vaccine “under any circumstances” mediamatters.org/laura-ingraham…
Civil Rights movement activists got arrested (you may have heard of this Letter that MLK wrote from a Birmingham Jail). That was part of the activism -- you break an unjust law and pay the consequences as a way of calling attention to the injustice.
The convoys are not engaging in civil disobedience and being punished. They are using the threat or act of force to make swaths of the country ungovernable until they get their way. That's a great strategy in a dictatorship but loathsome in a democracy.
Fox’s propagandists have cheered on the truckers as “freedom fighters,” “civil rights hero[es],” and “the face of individualism and rebellion,” while denouncing the purported “totalitarianism” of the Canadian government.
Rather than encouraging their viewers to take shots that could keep them from dying, Fox stars have championed the truckers as culture war heroes their audience members should emulate.
Fox News has all but ignored both Mike Pence's speech and the RNC's "legitimate political discourse" debacle. Sparse coverage on the "news" side, and none at all from the "opinion" propagandists. Why? mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-n…
Fox is something of a black box, and divining the meaning of what the network does or doesn’t run is difficult. But two things seem to be happening.
First, they are starting their upfronts push, when they sell the bulk of their ads. It's a vulnerable time when the brass becomes more worried about negative coverage.