So, I have yet to watch the extras on the Fifty Shades blurays. Time to watch them all back to back.
If you're wondering why I haven't, despite the depths of the rest of my research, it's because they all sound like crappy EPK garbage. "Oh, yeah, we're super happy to be working on this, uh, this, uh, project!"
First up: Tease of Fifty Shades Darker.
30 second teaser trailer that uses footage shot in Jamie Dornan's hotel room, and not footage from either movie.
Alright, I just realized there's actually, like, 20+ 90 second character vignettes on the first disc alone, so I'm not gonna tweet all of them.
Alright, I thought the vignette on Christian's Apartment was going to be dreadful, but it's actually a really solid BTS look at building the apartment set and the work of the set decorator and production designer.
Fun fact: I assumed the view out Christian's windows was composited, but it's actually a series of photo backdrops matching time of day.
Lol, the code name for the first movie was The Adventures of Max & Banks
Since the name of the production is going to be on permits and stuff it's to mitigate how many fans show up when you're shooting in public.
Even shooting Hudson we had to be careful not to let out that we were at the Heartland set with Heartland actors because swarms of people would show up. Even then people still showed up b/c it's impossible to hide the fact that *something* is shooting at Maggie's.
Also in this BTS featurette EL James just described the playroom as "womb-like"
The feature "E L James and Fifty Shades" starts off with Erika's fake version of where Fifty Shades came from, claiming that she wrote a fanfiction, and while writing that "got the idea for Fifty Shades".
Alright, there's all the Grey special features watched. I'm now very curious for the contrast to Darker's. Also it's worth noting that Kelly Marcel didn't appear in the Grey features at all.
Two very pointless deleted scenes.
The "Writing Darker" feature starts with E L giving an actually accurate origin story.
It's, uh, incredibly telling that the two main special features are focused on the new writer and director.
Darker writer/director profiles "really got along with Erika"
This "Change in Direction" feature is 50% justifying Erika hijacking the production and acting as proxy writer/director.
It's also telling that Dakota and Jamie are much, much, much less present in these features after the previous film's BTS had a long, glowing interview all about how much they trusted STJ to handle the sex scenes with delicacy, how safe they felt.
On that subject, the final feature on the disc was talking about the sex scenes and Dakota Johnson doesn't mention James Foley once, it's all about her leaning on Jamie to be her advocate on set.
By Freed the special features are pretty anemic. Two deleted scenes, three features, and some music videos.
I'm sorry. One deleted scene. The detail of Christian giving Ana a bunch of hickeys in revenge for her taking her top off on the beach. It's bad.
Like, it was already a bad scene in the book, but the staging is really bad. Jamie and Dakota start laughing at the end of one take.
Addendum, what looked like one feature, "The Final Climax" is actually a header for 9 things.
These menus are pretty bad.
There's a fascinating drift in these features that I'm going to try and mention in the video.
The costume director from the first film is possibly my new favourite person, this delightfully eccentric guy who spent an entire video talking about communicating characters' emotional states through subtle outfit details.
The secondary creative team that they talk with in Darker and Freed are basically "we wanted something really expensive that would surprise the fans."
This is one of the features with Mark Bridges if you want to see what I mean.
Why it's interesting to me is that the things secondary creatives want to talk about when the BTS crew interviews them, it tells you what's on the top of their minds, what kinds of conversations are they having over and over, what's the creative atmosphere like.
The Final Climax is really, really boring.
There's only one left, a 9 minute conversation between Erika and the guy who plays Jack Hyde, and those 9 minutes feel like a mountain right now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Of these 2.3 thousand replies it would be generous to say that even ten are actual humans. The rest are bots.
I haven't felt the need to reply to much of anything because the crypto ecosystem's reality speaks for itself.
I have found it fascinating watching a substantial number of web3/crypto pushers come to the dawning realization that they're not misunderstood, they're loathed. Realize that they had no idea the degree of ad spam, bots, and over-hyped shilling that everyone else is dealing with.
There's also been the frankly embarrassing "I deserve to talk to Dan Olson directly! RT/like if you agree!" responses, and the only slightly less embarrassing "I'm going to pretend that this ad pitch for my product is actually a substantive reply to Dan's criticisms."
If "over one trillion dollars of value" disappears from your ecosystem over a weekend and Monday's news isn't a bloodbath of businesses going under then you're not a real economy.
The number of large brain big boys smugly replying with “now do the stock market” is pretty revealing ‘cus, like, mate: that’s the first panel
I find it very funny that such a high % of NFTs are just appeals to the navel gazing myth of NFTs.
Because, surprising no one familiar with how online works, it's a marketplace, and a particularly insular one, so to be competitive you need to appeal to the interests and sensibilities of the patron class
And what are the patron class of NFTs interested in? NFTs and crypto.
So what do you make your NFTs about? NFTs and crypto, of course.
Imagine being so butthurt that people don't care about your collection of CryptoPunks, and mock you by making your CryptoPunks into their PFP, that you convince Twitter to add a verification badge saying all your CryptoPunks are authentic.
"If you see anyone else with my CryptoPunk as their PFP they're an imposter, they do not own the authenticated, verified version of my CryptoPunk. Unless they minted and verified their own bootleg I guess. But the most important thing: I am not the loser here, they are."
Up next: verification badges for completed Innistrad card lists, Homies series 3, and authentic Wuzzles.
I was looking this up because I was looking up Ethereum benchmarks and got a banner ad for a cryptocasino, which I decided to poke around, and found their live Megaball game, where the biggest payout was 702.35 mETH, which from what I can work out is about 3¢?
I'm not confident in that because it's either a fractional value of Ethereum, or it's a completely separate crypto "backed by interest-generating real-world assets which initially include car equity loans." (kill me)