Today is 131st birthday of #Ramanujan, celebrated as #NationalMathematicsDay in India.
This year is also the 100th anniversary of his election as FRS.
131 is a palindromic and permutable prime with 113 and 311.
Can also be stated as the sum of 3 consecutive primes 41 + 43 + 47.
#Ramanujan's letter to Hardy is an all-time classic -
"I beg to introduce myself to you as a clerk"
"I have no University education"
"I have not trodden through the conventional ... but I am striking out a new path"
"I have made a special investigation of divergent series"
Source: Bruce C. Berndt in Ramanujan's Notebooks: Part I (1994)
Initially, #Ramanujan mostly studied two books: 1. Carr's Synopsis of Pure and Applied Mathematics 2. Loney's trigonometry
Carr’s book is like an encyclopedia with a lot of formulas but no proofs.
Ramanujan imitated the style and probably felt formulas are left for him to prove
In his first letter to Hardy - #Ramanujan proved that
1+2+3+...=-1/12
This is also called Ramanujan Summation, different from Ramanujan Sums.
(first proof of this is probably from #Euler ~ 1760)
During his 5 years in Cambridge/England, #Ramanujan published ~30 papers that founded the basis of modern maths. A few of them: 1. Prime numbers 2. Hypergeometric series 3. Elliptic functions 4. Partitions 5. Probabilistic Number Theory janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id…
During his last year, when #Ramanujan knew he was dying, he worked even crazier.
The work is summarised in the "Last Notebook" springer.com/gb/book/978038…
These are 138 sheets of paper containing over 600 mathematical formulas without proof. Each proof starts a new field in maths.
Finally, #Ramanujan predicted his death (like everyone...:)
“I have made a serious mathematical assessment of my own horoscope, and there is no doubt about it: I will die before I reach the age of thirty-five.”
Ramanujan died at the age of 32 = 2^5 (1887-1920)
Link to @RSocPublishing special issue in celebration of the centenary of Srinivasa Ramanujan's election as FRS.
Thanks, @Stefan_W_Hell for sharing the data which helped to revisit the claims made in the following article "MINFLUX nanoscopy delivers 3D multicolor nanometer resolution in cells" @naturemethods nature.com/articles/s4159…
Hope our findings are useful for MINFLUX research!
First, using PERPL, our localization precision estimates of 0.98±0.02 nm, 3.20±0.05 nm and 3.31±0.08 nm broadly agreed with the published analysis but implying FWHM of 2.4-7.1 nm.
So, what should be the best theoretical resolution? 1-3 nm as claimed?