Everyone needs to calm down a bit and see where the reporting by a range of organizations goes. There are many ways to square the Mueller statement and the gist of the Buzzfeed story. Just for instance, what if the precise nature of the lie Cohen ostensibly told is misdescribed?
Or what if the documents supporting the story come from sources other than those described? The point is that the Mueller statement is far from a flat denial of the gist of the story, and the authors of the statement surely know how to write clearly when they want to.
Cable television needs always to tote up the score in real time, but I’ve been reading a good bit about Watergate lately, and history makes a lot of judgments about who “won” a particular news cycle look awfully silly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: This morning @propublica has what I consider the most important story we have ever published.
It concerns a trove of secret IRS files we were given on the tax returns of the nation’s richest people. The findings are extraordinary. propublica.org/article/the-se…
Turns out that many of the ultra wealthy pay NO income taxes for entire years— Soros three times, Bezos and Icahn twice, Musk and Bloomberg once. Bezos one year even claimed a $4000 child credit.
As a percentage of their gains in wealth, Buffett has paid 0.1% (10 cents on every $100), Bezos 1.1%, Bloomberg 1.3%, the 25 richest as a group just 3.4%.
Even on just their income, the richest pay less than 16%, far below the 37% top rate: propublica.org/article/you-ma…
Trump’s Opportunity Zones are emerging as a huge scandal, a giveaway to the rich, often those with political connections. Here are three stories, in order of their appearance. First, about the CEO of @UnderArmour propublica.org/article/trump-…
1/ We’re posting @propublica ‘s audited financials for calendar 2018 today, as we do every year, so this seems a good moment for a mini-rant on the limits of GAAP accounting for non-profit news ow.ly/VwAz50ug1DC
@propublica 2/ As you’ll see, revenue, per the financials, fell 39% YOY, while expenses rose 31%. Yikes, right? But revenues actually received during the year rose to a new high, at roughly $30.2 million. So what’s up?
@propublica 3/ GAAP accounting is good for all sorts of things, but not helpful here. That’s because it places all revenue from multi-year grants in the year the grants are made.
So @GovMattBevin is back, with a defense of why he’s not dog-whistling anti-Semitism in which he can’t manage to use the word “Jewish”, and with all sorts of accusations of partisanship by @ProPublica. What he doesn’t offer are facts, so maybe a few of those are worth adding:
So far, the reaction of the White House press corps (and their editors) to the banning of Acosta has been entirely rhetorical. That seems to me a potentially historic error.
The impetus for talking loudly but carrying no stick has been that actually doing something might help Trump politically. But it is emphatically not the job of the press to play politics.
What is the plan for when Trump concocts an excuse for vetoing a reporter from the NYT or WaPo? Surely we must realize that if it works with CNN, this will just be the first time, and not the last.