BREAKING: This morning @propublica has what I consider the most important story we have ever published.
It concerns a trove of secret IRS files we were given on the tax returns of the nation’s richest people. The findings are extraordinary. propublica.org/article/the-se…
Turns out that many of the ultra wealthy pay NO income taxes for entire years— Soros three times, Bezos and Icahn twice, Musk and Bloomberg once. Bezos one year even claimed a $4000 child credit.
As a percentage of their gains in wealth, Buffett has paid 0.1% (10 cents on every $100), Bezos 1.1%, Bloomberg 1.3%, the 25 richest as a group just 3.4%.
Even on just their income, the richest pay less than 16%, far below the 37% top rate: propublica.org/article/you-ma…
The 25 richest Americans are collectively worth $1.1 trillion. It takes 14.3 million average wage earners to tally the same wealth. The average earner group paid literally 70 times as much in income taxes in 2018 as the 25.
Here’s @propublica's methodology on calculating true tax rates as a percentage of gains in wealth by the richest, as well as relative tax burdens on average wage earners: propublica.org/article/how-we…
Trump’s Opportunity Zones are emerging as a huge scandal, a giveaway to the rich, often those with political connections. Here are three stories, in order of their appearance. First, about the CEO of @UnderArmour propublica.org/article/trump-…
1/ We’re posting @propublica ‘s audited financials for calendar 2018 today, as we do every year, so this seems a good moment for a mini-rant on the limits of GAAP accounting for non-profit news ow.ly/VwAz50ug1DC
@propublica 2/ As you’ll see, revenue, per the financials, fell 39% YOY, while expenses rose 31%. Yikes, right? But revenues actually received during the year rose to a new high, at roughly $30.2 million. So what’s up?
@propublica 3/ GAAP accounting is good for all sorts of things, but not helpful here. That’s because it places all revenue from multi-year grants in the year the grants are made.
So @GovMattBevin is back, with a defense of why he’s not dog-whistling anti-Semitism in which he can’t manage to use the word “Jewish”, and with all sorts of accusations of partisanship by @ProPublica. What he doesn’t offer are facts, so maybe a few of those are worth adding:
So far, the reaction of the White House press corps (and their editors) to the banning of Acosta has been entirely rhetorical. That seems to me a potentially historic error.
The impetus for talking loudly but carrying no stick has been that actually doing something might help Trump politically. But it is emphatically not the job of the press to play politics.
What is the plan for when Trump concocts an excuse for vetoing a reporter from the NYT or WaPo? Surely we must realize that if it works with CNN, this will just be the first time, and not the last.