This is going to stun a lot of people, but Matt Schlapp has the facts wrong.

I know, I know. Let's dig in.
First of all, yes, Jackie Robinson was a registered Republican.

During the postwar realignment of the parties over civil rights, there remained a significant chunk of black voters in the GOP.

As late as the 1960 race, GOP nominee Richard Nixon took 32% of the black vote.
But all that changed in 1963-64, as the Democratic Party -- long the home of segregationists -- increasingly became seen as the party of civil rights, thanks to JFK and LBJ's public embrace of the cause.

That longer shift is detailed in this thread:
Meanwhile, the GOP's image moved in the opposite direction, thanks in large part to Sen. Barry Goldwater -- who voted against the 1964 CRA -- emerging as LBJ's opponent in the 1964 election.

The change here was swift and stark.
Goldwater himself wasn't a bigot, but his stance against the Civil Rights Act rippled throughout the party.

As I've noted before, the change in the Republican party platform on matters of civil rights, just between 1960 and 1964, is striking:
Though conservatives were on the rise, the GOP still contained a good number of moderates and liberals, who hoped to make a stand at the 1964 RNC.

NY Gov. Nelson Rockefeller tried to win the party back from "extremists" but was heckled and harrassed.
For black Republicans, the 1964 convention was a nightmare.

Here's a great piece by @mattdelmont on it, with a nice shout-out to @LeahRigueur's must-read book on black Republicans in this era. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
With the Goldwater candidacy and, more important, the rise of conservatism within the Republican Party, Robinson began to have serious doubts about his future in the GOP.

He wasn't shy about sharing them. (Again, from @mattdelmont:)
But there were still moderates in the party, and Jackie Robinson hoped that after the disastrous defeat of Goldwater -- a race in which the GOP share of the black vote plummeted to single digits (see below, from @pbump) -- the party might reverse its course on civil rights.
Nixon's nomination in 1968 finished what Goldwater's run had begun.

We have to remember, this was a "new Nixon." After a decent record on civil rights in the '50s and early '60s, he reversed course to catch up with his party.

See here for more details:
Robinson had held out hope that the Republicans might turn away from the conservative path that Goldwater set them on -- perhaps by nominating a moderate like George Romney -- but Nixon's nomination dashed that hope and convinced him to walk away for good.
I'll pause to note for @mschlapp that Robinson surely knew Democrats had been the party of slavery and Jim Crow, but he also knew that Strom Thurmond -- the original Dixiecrat -- was now a key player in the GOP.

That mattered more for him in '68, and most black voters too.
And so, in the 1968 election, Robinson threw his full support to the Democrats.
Notably, the Democratic presidential nominee that year was Vice President Hubert Humphrey, who back in 1948 had led the charge for civil rights at the Democratic convention -- the very charge that prompted Strom Thurmond and other segregationists to leave.
And so, naturally, Jackie Robinson went all in for Hubert H. Humphrey ("HHH"), a proven civil rights champion, in the 1968 presidential campaign.
In his last years, Robinson became more outspoken, showing sympathy for Black Power protests and contempt for what he saw as false patriotism.

"I cannot stand and sing the anthem," he wrote in 1972. "I cannot salute the flag; I know that I am a black man in a white world."
So, yes, @mschlapp, Jackie Robinson *would* absolutely hate Donald Trump.

And furthermore, it's pretty clear that if he were alive and active today, Donald Trump would absolutely hate Jackie Robinson.
And, seriously, if you enjoyed anything in this thread, be sure to read @LeahRigueur's book: amazon.com/Loneliness-Bla…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin M. Kruse

Kevin M. Kruse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinMKruse

Feb 1
My trash cans can’t be racist either, but if I repeatedly dump my garbage on my black neighbors’ yard because they’re black, that is racist.
The same people who have been saying “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” nonstop for decades are somehow baffled by “highways aren’t racist, but highway planners can be racist”
Also, this argument suggests that federal policy was once not “woke” and perhaps even racist and, huh, I wonder if there’s a theory to analyze that
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
In 1922, Klan leaders (including N.B. Forrest) announced plans for a new University of America.

They said the new college would focus on teaching Christianity and a history that promoted "Americanism," in order to explain to students how "this is a white man's country."
Almost exactly a century ago -- from the Atlanta Constitution (2/5/1922)
Oh Lord, that's right -- the site they're discussing here is now a synagogue.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 25
Twitter aside, I'm going to go with the time we went to Nobu for my birthday and David Hasselhoff was VERY LOUDLY holding court at the table next to us.
I was @kaj33’s faculty host when he got an honorary degree. I had all these questions about his activism but the seating arrangement meant I didn’t get a chance to talk much. When I did, I panicked and asked about the book tour he was on: “so, I guess you’ve been flying a lot?”
The nicest celebrities were probably @CobieSmulders and @TaranKillam, who we sat next to at the @iamsambee Not the WHCD event. Very nice, very normal, swapped kid pics. My only regret was not raving about TK’s Drunk History episode.

(Sam Bee, also nice as hell. Just great.)
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
Honestly, I don't even know where to begin with this one.
For all the article's claims that historians thought Biden would be another FDR, there's a link to a Doris Kearns Goodwin interview and ... that's it.
The take on the New Deal is wrong -- FDR wasn't laser focused on economic issues alone, but had programs for conservation, public power, the arts, etc. from the start.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 25, 2021
If you’re wondering why this ad never mentions what the scary book was that she wanted to ban or what course it was used in, well, it was Toni Morrison’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Beloved and the class was senior-year AP English.
If you think your high school senior can’t handle college-level novels in a college-credit course, maybe he shouldn’t take Advanced Placement English?
A lot of people are embarrassed for her son, but (unless I’m mistaken) he seems to be a 27-year-old Republican Party lawyer so he’s probably fine with all this?

washingtonpost.com/local/educatio…

nytimes.com/2020/12/18/sty…
Read 4 tweets
Oct 14, 2021
Hey, it looks like Ted Cruz has nothing better to do than respond to three-day-old tweets.

Must be nice to have that kind of free time with no responsibilities and nothing going on in the world.

Well, let's dig in!
First of all, no, "there is no Biden vaccine mandate" that's been put into effect yet.

Here's a news story about it yesterday. (Which I guess you'll get around to reading a couple days from now?)

nbcnews.com/politics/white…
You might not be aware that "next week" hasn't actually happened yet, but, uh ... it hasn't?

So, no, there is not currently a "Biden vaccine mandate" in place.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(