JUST IN: Alston & Bird partners Brian Boone and Ted Kang have acknowledged representation of "Country A" in the grand jury dispute, through an unsealed motion at the DC Circuit. / Earlier story from me: buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisg…
And, yes, as someone noted, A&B do regularly in their filings — at SCOTUS as well — just refer to the subpoenaed corporation, wholly owned by a foreign country, as “Country A.”
This seems to me to be a pretty transparent attempt to argue, through the language they choose, that the company is inseparable from the country (as part of their Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act argument).
Continuing a thread, we also learned definitively yesterday, in a different filing, in a different court, that it ~is~ the special counsel’s office fighting the foreign country-owned company in the grand jury dispute.
"The Baltimore Sun frequently employed prejudice as a tool of the times. It fed the fear and anxiety of white readers with stereotypes and caricatures that reinforced their erroneous beliefs about Black Americans." baltimoresun.com/opinion/editor…
The Sun editorial board: "Distrust of The Sun has been handed down through generations of Black Marylanders, deservedly so."
Mike Lee questions Nina Morrison, EDNY nominee and Innocence Project litigator, on whether prosecutorial misconduct has tainted "thousands" of cases over time.
Hawley is up, and he's doing the same. (Hawley's reliability on "law and order" is undercut by his view of the events of Jan. 6.) He's going after St. Louis DA Kim Gardner now (re-elected in 2020 by her constituents), who the Republican guys leading the state dislike.
Breaking: #SCOTUS blocks a lower court ruling that required Alabama to draw a new congressional map to prevent the dilution of Black people's votes under the Voting Rights Act. The vote was 5-4, with Roberts joining the more liberal justices in dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
Note that, as has been the case with Roberts before in these splits this past year, he does not necessarily join Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan on the substantive question. Here, he specifically questions the underlying voting rights precedent, but says that is the law now.