Again, @LarryGlickman has covered this extensively, so dive into this thread for a nice detailed take on it all. (And follow Larry, if you're not already!)
Because he's covered the finer points well, I'll just do a quick tour of a few popular things that were denounced by the right as "socialist" when they were proposed.
(This was common in the New Deal and before - here's Al Smith in 1928 - so I'll focus on the 1950s and 1960s.)
THE POLIO VACCINE
In 1955, Eisenhower's HEW Secretary, millionaire publisher Oveta Culp Hobby, denounced a proposed free polio vaccine as "socialized medicine by the back door."
THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM
Meanwhile, Eisenhower's administration was accused of promoting socialism by the far right. Here's conservative radio host Clarence Manion denouncing the interstate highway system, among other things, as "creeping socialism."
MEDICARE
In 1961, Ronald Reagan warned that if the proposals for "socialized medicine" passed, "you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free."
THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
In 1963, when the Civil Rights Act was still stuck in Congress, conservative opponents denounced it as "the Socialists' Omnibus Bill of 1963."
AID TO EDUCATION & SOCIAL SECURITY
In 1965, conservative journalist Walter Trohan denounced all of the Great Society -- Medicare as passed, plus federal aid to education and expansions of Social Security -- as steps to socialism.
We could go on and on here -- and again @LarryGlickman's threads carry this theme across the 20th century, so check them out -- but the pattern is pretty clear.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The same people who have been saying “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” nonstop for decades are somehow baffled by “highways aren’t racist, but highway planners can be racist”
Also, this argument suggests that federal policy was once not “woke” and perhaps even racist and, huh, I wonder if there’s a theory to analyze that
In 1922, Klan leaders (including N.B. Forrest) announced plans for a new University of America.
They said the new college would focus on teaching Christianity and a history that promoted "Americanism," in order to explain to students how "this is a white man's country."
Almost exactly a century ago -- from the Atlanta Constitution (2/5/1922)
Oh Lord, that's right -- the site they're discussing here is now a synagogue.
Twitter aside, I'm going to go with the time we went to Nobu for my birthday and David Hasselhoff was VERY LOUDLY holding court at the table next to us.
I was @kaj33’s faculty host when he got an honorary degree. I had all these questions about his activism but the seating arrangement meant I didn’t get a chance to talk much. When I did, I panicked and asked about the book tour he was on: “so, I guess you’ve been flying a lot?”
The nicest celebrities were probably @CobieSmulders and @TaranKillam, who we sat next to at the @iamsambee Not the WHCD event. Very nice, very normal, swapped kid pics. My only regret was not raving about TK’s Drunk History episode.
For all the article's claims that historians thought Biden would be another FDR, there's a link to a Doris Kearns Goodwin interview and ... that's it.
The take on the New Deal is wrong -- FDR wasn't laser focused on economic issues alone, but had programs for conservation, public power, the arts, etc. from the start.
If you’re wondering why this ad never mentions what the scary book was that she wanted to ban or what course it was used in, well, it was Toni Morrison’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Beloved and the class was senior-year AP English.
If you think your high school senior can’t handle college-level novels in a college-credit course, maybe he shouldn’t take Advanced Placement English?
A lot of people are embarrassed for her son, but (unless I’m mistaken) he seems to be a 27-year-old Republican Party lawyer so he’s probably fine with all this?