Please join me, if you will, on a quick jaunt through the insanity of trying to track down the data behind a poorly sourced article in the news.
This article, published during the weekend, caught my eye: it claims that a 2017 study found that 70% of Americans think women should change their names when they marry, and half say it should be required
Here's the study they link to:
link.springer.com/article/10.100…

But the stat isn't from that 2017 study! Instead, it dates back to a paper presented in 2009. Here's USA Today from that year: usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/20…

And the university press release: newsinfo.iu.edu/web/page/norma…
But, although it's CITED in that paper, which is here (citation.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_ap…), it's not from that paper either.

It's from a survey taken in 2006.
russellsage.org/sites/all/file…
Here's the actual table:
So to recap, we have a new news article citing a 2-year old study-citing a 10-year-old-study citing a 13-year-old survey that uses an agree/disagree scale and that notably, doesn't appear to have any "unsure" options.
Anyways, these are also both older surveys, but it's worth noting that if you give people the option to say that women should do whatever they want, a plurality will take it.
The moral is, 93.1% of the time, it pays to beware of random, out-of-context statistics.
PS: At least this time, there's a legit, if dated, survey at the bottom of the rabbit hole! That is....not always the case.

PPS: Apologies for the million or so minor typos festooned throughout this thread.
PPPS: As a special bonus, here's another outlet running with the original news article but conflating the two stats and claiming that 70% say it should be legally required.
PPPPS (oy): Since I'm here extolling the virtues of precision - when I said there's not an "unsure" on the survey, that's correct, but more salient point is no neutral option.

Which also isn't inherently wrong, but as the other polls show, you get pretty different results w/ one
*prolonged sigh*

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ariel Edwards-Levy

Ariel Edwards-Levy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aedwardslevy

Oct 19, 2021
this should be the dek for every story, regardless of content

washingtonian.com/2021/10/19/new…
FDA planning to allow mix-and-match Covid-19 vaccine boosters
With two new ungulates in a corral, it's like a zebra honeypot

The Economic Rebound Is Still Waiting for Workers
With two new ungulates in a corral, it's like a zebra honeypot
Who Is the Bad Art Friend?
With two new ungulates in a corral, it's like a zebra honeypot
Read 4 tweets
Oct 12, 2021
Whether people are willing to tell strangers their vaccine status over the phone is actually one of the things that we have an excellent way of testing -- there's CDC data to compare it to!

So far, many public polls tracking this look pretty accurate.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021…
None of this is to say that election polling doesn't have ongoing issues, or even that polling around vaccines/mandates isn't subject to them (there are some less rosy assessments out there as well). But this is really one of the *more* directly measurable questions out there.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 11, 2021
good morning, this week I am obsessed with the spycraft of the peanut butter sandwich

cnn.com/2021/10/10/pol…
what if the foreign agent was allergic!!
like, how do you decide on a peanut-butter-and-classified-intel sandwich over classified-intel-and-marmalade

was it creamy or crunchy

why only half a sandwich
Read 5 tweets
Oct 8, 2021
survey research is so weird Image
department of aggressive quotation marks Image
where people sometimes post their thoughts Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 8, 2021
no better way to realize that you are an Old than the sinking feeling of looking through 2008 polling and realizing that it really was an entirely different political era
file under:
1. wow, that's a sea change
2. "gravel clear winner"
3. ok!
4. sports jacket ImageImageImageImage
that escalated quickly Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 8, 2021
This is a really, really good paragraph on how to think about What It Means For The Midterms.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… Image
Also, this: "[T]he problem isn’t really polling. Rather, it’s the use of polls to center everything that happens in politics around those November 2022 swing voters in Wisconsin."

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The subset of political actions that are going to meaningfully affect an election is both small and often unknowable, and yet that often becomes the primary lens through which those actions are examined, even in cases where there are other large, knowable effects.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(