Interesting and challenging session on conceptualising good research use at #transformure. Thread of key insights to follow. 
First, @VivianT88 asks: how (if at all) would a normative model of good research use look different from a model of good policymaking or good decision-making?
(Perhaps in how it frames the relationship with other, 'non-evidence', considerations?) #transformure
(Perhaps in how it frames the relationship with other, 'non-evidence', considerations?) #transformure
Next, @oliver_kathryn offers 3 metaphors for evidence use. Ultimately the endpoint is process not product; we must recognise the role of those employed to synthesise sources of evidence & seek to support them in making connections and making sense, not trump them. #transformure
Stephen Weatherford distinguishes between use of research in policy and in practice, pointing out that different considerations may apply in each. Policymakers specialise in developing coalitions; the place for research evidence in this work may be constrained. #transformure
Concluding, @oliver_kathryn cautions against 'top tips' for influencing policy, which masquerade as universal strategies but are highly contextually specific. See also her recent review with @CairneyPaul, which finds a lot of snake oil. #transformure nature.com/articles/s4159…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
