Because of all that very real evidence, there are lots of books on the Southern Strategy, ranging from contemporary works of journalism to recent works by historians and political scientists.
Second, she insists the two parties didn't switch roles on civil rights, which is again, complete nonsense.
Here's a thread I did on the larger arc, which is probably *the* main through-line in 20th c. American political history.
Owens, predictably, points to the small number of congressmen who switched parties as "proof" that the larger literature on the racial realignment is a myth -- even though that isn't actually something historians and political scientists emphasize in the work on this.
As I've noted here, Strom Thurmond *was* the only Southern Democratic Senator to switch parties in 1964 ... because he was the only one who got a special deal that preserved his seniority and thereby preserved his perks and power in the Senate.
That said, there were plenty of others who switched, especially if we look beyond the outliers of senior congressmen and look at state and local politicians.
Or we can listen to former Republican strategists like Kevin Phillips and Lee Atwater, or former heads of the RNC like Michael Steele and Ken Mehlman, all of whom noted that the Southern Strategy was quite real: washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content…
Instead of all that, Owens tells people to check out a Prager U video that "further explicates" the idea that the southern strategy was a myth.
Pretty sure she's talking about this one, which is hilariously bad.
You can take the Nixon archives, the word of GOP strategists and RNC chairmen, party switches by politicians and region, the GOP platforms, polling data, and all the rest.
Or you can handwave all of it away and call the Southern Strategy a "myth" because of a "Prager U" video.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The same people who have been saying “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” nonstop for decades are somehow baffled by “highways aren’t racist, but highway planners can be racist”
Also, this argument suggests that federal policy was once not “woke” and perhaps even racist and, huh, I wonder if there’s a theory to analyze that
In 1922, Klan leaders (including N.B. Forrest) announced plans for a new University of America.
They said the new college would focus on teaching Christianity and a history that promoted "Americanism," in order to explain to students how "this is a white man's country."
Almost exactly a century ago -- from the Atlanta Constitution (2/5/1922)
Oh Lord, that's right -- the site they're discussing here is now a synagogue.
Twitter aside, I'm going to go with the time we went to Nobu for my birthday and David Hasselhoff was VERY LOUDLY holding court at the table next to us.
I was @kaj33’s faculty host when he got an honorary degree. I had all these questions about his activism but the seating arrangement meant I didn’t get a chance to talk much. When I did, I panicked and asked about the book tour he was on: “so, I guess you’ve been flying a lot?”
The nicest celebrities were probably @CobieSmulders and @TaranKillam, who we sat next to at the @iamsambee Not the WHCD event. Very nice, very normal, swapped kid pics. My only regret was not raving about TK’s Drunk History episode.
For all the article's claims that historians thought Biden would be another FDR, there's a link to a Doris Kearns Goodwin interview and ... that's it.
The take on the New Deal is wrong -- FDR wasn't laser focused on economic issues alone, but had programs for conservation, public power, the arts, etc. from the start.
If you’re wondering why this ad never mentions what the scary book was that she wanted to ban or what course it was used in, well, it was Toni Morrison’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Beloved and the class was senior-year AP English.
If you think your high school senior can’t handle college-level novels in a college-credit course, maybe he shouldn’t take Advanced Placement English?
A lot of people are embarrassed for her son, but (unless I’m mistaken) he seems to be a 27-year-old Republican Party lawyer so he’s probably fine with all this?