The reach of the First Pandemic (or Justinianic plague) was massive. First recorded in Egypt in 541AD, it spread rapidly to Byzantium, and then further west, reaching Gaul in 543AD, and Ireland in 544AD. We now know that it reached Britain at the same time too 2/10
In addition to the new evidence from Britain, Y. pestis DNA has also been found in several cemeteries in Bavaria, where there are also no historical records of pestilence. This means that we’re probably seriously underestimating just how much of Europe was affected! 3/10
It's difficult to say how many people died. According to Gregory of Tours, "dead bodies were so numerous that it was not even possible to count them". That might be an exaggeration, but it’s still a lot of people, making the First Pandemic comparable to the Black Death 5/10
We talk a lot about the impact of the 14th century Black Death on living standards, but we rarely talk about the First Pandemic in the same way! Byzantinists are better at discussing it, but it’s been virtually ignored by archaeologists of western Europe until very recently 6/10
However, several people (Marilyn Dunn, Mischa Meier) have pointed out that it most likely inspired a ‘turn towards religion’. When there’s a lot of people around you dying, you’re more likely to be concerned with the fate of your soul! 7/10
I think mass mortality had a long-lasting impact on the relationship between the living and the dead, causing a widescale change in burial practices (this was a key part of my thesis; I’ll be talking about it in Cambridge on 17/06, and hope to turn it into a paper very soon) 8/10
While we shouldn’t rush to attribute all changes to 6th-7th century society to plague, there were probably other economic and social impacts which we have yet to explore. But first, we need to know about the spread of plague. This is where the aDNA evidence is so important! 9/10
The @SocMedArch conference in July on the Long Black Death is very timely, and I’m hoping to see lots of these issues discussed there. Hopefully the aDNA analysis can provide a starting point for brand new discussions about change in early medieval society across Europe 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My paper on early medieval corpses, grave goods, and the relationship between the two, is now available online in the European Journal of Archaeology! tinyurl.com/vttx9gs
Summary below 👇 1/
This paper stemmed from dissatisfaction in the way we commonly talk about mortuary practices, often from the perspective of the mourner, and the society they leave behind. But what about the corpse itself? There are plenty of societies where corpses maintain a social presence 2/
Societies like the Sa’dan Toraja people of Indonesia keep corpses in the home for years after death. Corpses may have changed, but they still resemble the person they were during life, and so there’s a lot of emotion connected to them. 3/