By "a reliable peddler of this sort of thing" I can only assume Williamson meant that I am "a reliable peddler of the overwhelming consensus of four decades of work by historians and political scientists."
My Twitter presence leads some to single me out now, but -- and I can't repeat this enough -- the case I present online is not some kind of edgy revisionism that I'm pushing alone but a standard account chronicled by countless historians and political scientists for decades.
Beyond the standard denialism about the party realignment, Williamson specifically takes issue with my assertion in this thread of mine that, when Biden entered the Senate in 1973, Jim Eastland (D-MS) and Herman Talmadge (D-GA) were seen as conservative.
Williamson asserts that "by most criteria" men like them were understood to be progressives.
Which criteria exactly?
In that thread and this one too, I went to lengths to show that, in 1973, by the criteria of the American Conservative Union -- you know, Matt Schlapp's group? the one that runs CPAC today? -- Eastland and Talmadge were considered to be quite conservative.
But maybe the American Conservative Union was an unreliable judge of ... American Conservatism.
Well, how about William F. Buckley Jr., who identifies Talmadge and Eastland as "conservative-minded Democrats" who might be lured to switch to the GOP?
So the American Conservative Union thought Eastland and Talmadge were conservative & William F. Buckley Jr. thought so too.
Williamson ignores all that and points to Talmadge's vote on Medicare. (You'll note he ignores Eastland's vote. Here it is.)
How representative was that one vote? How conservative were Eastland and Talmadge in 1965?
The ACU ratings don't start until 1971, but at the other end, the ADA had its liberal ratings.
Talmadge got a 12 from the ADA that year. Eastland ... zero. (Note Russell & Stennis too.)
So conservatives like the American Conservative Union & William F. Buckley thought they were conservatives, and liberals like the ADA thought they were conservatives.
And what about National Review itself?
Well, it literally ran a poem to Talmadge's conservatism in Jan 1972.
By most criteria, yes, it seems that Talmadge and Eastland were conservative.
Sincerely,
Your Most Humble and Reliable Peddler
Additional criteria:
Richard Nixon's strategist Kevin Phillips, author of The Emerging Republican Majority (1969):
The same people who have been saying “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” nonstop for decades are somehow baffled by “highways aren’t racist, but highway planners can be racist”
Also, this argument suggests that federal policy was once not “woke” and perhaps even racist and, huh, I wonder if there’s a theory to analyze that
In 1922, Klan leaders (including N.B. Forrest) announced plans for a new University of America.
They said the new college would focus on teaching Christianity and a history that promoted "Americanism," in order to explain to students how "this is a white man's country."
Almost exactly a century ago -- from the Atlanta Constitution (2/5/1922)
Oh Lord, that's right -- the site they're discussing here is now a synagogue.
Twitter aside, I'm going to go with the time we went to Nobu for my birthday and David Hasselhoff was VERY LOUDLY holding court at the table next to us.
I was @kaj33’s faculty host when he got an honorary degree. I had all these questions about his activism but the seating arrangement meant I didn’t get a chance to talk much. When I did, I panicked and asked about the book tour he was on: “so, I guess you’ve been flying a lot?”
The nicest celebrities were probably @CobieSmulders and @TaranKillam, who we sat next to at the @iamsambee Not the WHCD event. Very nice, very normal, swapped kid pics. My only regret was not raving about TK’s Drunk History episode.
For all the article's claims that historians thought Biden would be another FDR, there's a link to a Doris Kearns Goodwin interview and ... that's it.
The take on the New Deal is wrong -- FDR wasn't laser focused on economic issues alone, but had programs for conservation, public power, the arts, etc. from the start.
If you’re wondering why this ad never mentions what the scary book was that she wanted to ban or what course it was used in, well, it was Toni Morrison’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Beloved and the class was senior-year AP English.
If you think your high school senior can’t handle college-level novels in a college-credit course, maybe he shouldn’t take Advanced Placement English?
A lot of people are embarrassed for her son, but (unless I’m mistaken) he seems to be a 27-year-old Republican Party lawyer so he’s probably fine with all this?