Sincere question asked of me last week by a friend who's not up to speed on all the 'Reformed' tribes: "What is this 1689 thing and why does it seem like all the people who have it in their bio treat others like dirt?"
As I said, the question was sincere, not loaded. This person has no dog in the Reformed conversation hunt. He honestly didn't know what 1689 referred to. He was honestly, as an observer, making note that those he sees identifying with it for some reason don't treat others well.
The standard reply will be "Standing for truth always seems mean to outsiders" etc. But this is a good Christian brother, doctrinally strong & humble. At some point, we have to take a good look at ourselves as much as we look at others & discern whether we adorn the gospel well
And FYI: "Jesus turned over tables" or "Paul told people to castrate themselves" is a terrible base text for your 'ministry.'
Isn't it possible that because of the deception in our own hearts, that we may be more harsh than we ought to be? That in fact, what we think is Christlike behavior doesn't strike many as genuinely favoring the aroma of Christ? ftc.co/resource-libra…
And FTR, I explained to him about LBCF 1689 -- and said it was a good and sound doc -- and mentioned some 1689 folks who *aren't* jerks he might should check out. (Holla @docanddevo brothers)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Heard this morning that Steven has gone on into glory. Prayers for his wife and the church at Middletown Springs, VT are appreciated, I'm sure. Can I tell you about Steven's remarkable journey to Jesus? . . .
I remember his 1st Sunday in 2011. He stood out b/c he was by himself. 62 yrs old, I think. Long gray beard, flannel shirt, "work jeans." He was dressed liked a lot of 20-something hipsters except he came by it honestly. He looked like he'd just come in out of the woods
I went to meet him after service and he said, "You know, this is my first time in a church building in 44 years." I said, "No weddings, no funerals?" He said, "No. I grew up Catholic. Left home and religion when I was 18. Didn't want to have anything more to do with it."
3 keys to endurance in pastoral ministry: 1) Trust that the God who is sovereign loves you.
It's a good thing to believe God is in control, but it's empowering to believe he is also in fact love.
2) Friendships that are nourishing and a marriage (if applicable) that is strong.
Loneliness is wearying and withering. We are more tempted to quit when we feel all alone.
3) Ability to envision the green pasture beyond the woods.
Call it belief in "future grace," call it what you want. When you're in the weeds, so to speak, it's difficult to picture *not* being in them. Hopelessness seeps in . . .
A friend recently asked me what I thought it would take to bring peaceability and graciousness to our evangelical subcultures. I said I didn’t know, really, but I imagine it might need to be revival.
Like, actual revival — not a program or event. The Holy Spirit interrupting us and reordering us with his surprising power.
We seem to be incapable of deep repentance, self-reflection, and humility. We are too busy attacking and suspecting each other to consider our witness. But what’s impossible with man is possible with God.
Or they could credit the person with an “and” or “with.” But this idea that everybody’s entitled to have a book with their name on it is weird. Not everybody is good at everything. It’s ok to stay in our lanes.
The idea that putting your name on a book that someone else wrote is somehow ok because the person taking credit just isn’t capable of writing it themselves is just, yeah, weird. I flunk students who do this. Desire doesn’t equal entitlement
Many moons ago, I was serving at a church that had to fire the lead pastor for a variety of disqualifying behavior, including short-temperedness and verbal/emotional abuse of staff. I remember hearing something important in a "house meeting" where explanations were being made
The elders were recounting years (plural) of working with the pastor in pleading with him to repent, to get help with his anger issues, etc. When they fielded questions from congregation, one person asked why this process had to be so "official."
Why, they asked, didn't someone approach him as a friend and talk to him without threats about his job or whatever. The elder responding to the question said something that has stuck with me to this day. He said, "Pastor _______ doesn't really *do* friendship."
Thanks to all who engaged with this tweet, including the Reformed guys who called it “idiotic,” “eisegesis,” “racegesis” (?), and “a massive stretch.” I forgot the quotes and citation but this is actually a line from a John MacArthur sermon. gty.org/library/sermon…
FTR, I agree with Dr. Mac here. And you’ll have to forgive the “thou art the man”-ing here, but I was trying to conduct a little experiment about statements about race, about how we measure truth based more on approved or unapproved voices than the claims themselves.
A while way back I tweeted that the dispute between Paul and Peter recounted in Galatians was in part an issue about racism, and I got absolutely skewered. James White even torched me on the DL over it. Then I pointed out MacArthur made the same claim, and the criticism stopped