Or they could credit the person with an “and” or “with.” But this idea that everybody’s entitled to have a book with their name on it is weird. Not everybody is good at everything. It’s ok to stay in our lanes.
The idea that putting your name on a book that someone else wrote is somehow ok because the person taking credit just isn’t capable of writing it themselves is just, yeah, weird. I flunk students who do this. Desire doesn’t equal entitlement
And as in the classroom setting, just because the writer agrees to participate— or accepts money to participate— doesn’t mean it isn’t dishonest. Taking credit for someone else’s work is lying
(Also: I’ve been called both racist and ableist for my original tweet, in case you wondered how Twitter’s going these days)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A friend recently asked me what I thought it would take to bring peaceability and graciousness to our evangelical subcultures. I said I didn’t know, really, but I imagine it might need to be revival.
Like, actual revival — not a program or event. The Holy Spirit interrupting us and reordering us with his surprising power.
We seem to be incapable of deep repentance, self-reflection, and humility. We are too busy attacking and suspecting each other to consider our witness. But what’s impossible with man is possible with God.
Many moons ago, I was serving at a church that had to fire the lead pastor for a variety of disqualifying behavior, including short-temperedness and verbal/emotional abuse of staff. I remember hearing something important in a "house meeting" where explanations were being made
The elders were recounting years (plural) of working with the pastor in pleading with him to repent, to get help with his anger issues, etc. When they fielded questions from congregation, one person asked why this process had to be so "official."
Why, they asked, didn't someone approach him as a friend and talk to him without threats about his job or whatever. The elder responding to the question said something that has stuck with me to this day. He said, "Pastor _______ doesn't really *do* friendship."
Thanks to all who engaged with this tweet, including the Reformed guys who called it “idiotic,” “eisegesis,” “racegesis” (?), and “a massive stretch.” I forgot the quotes and citation but this is actually a line from a John MacArthur sermon. gty.org/library/sermon…
FTR, I agree with Dr. Mac here. And you’ll have to forgive the “thou art the man”-ing here, but I was trying to conduct a little experiment about statements about race, about how we measure truth based more on approved or unapproved voices than the claims themselves.
A while way back I tweeted that the dispute between Paul and Peter recounted in Galatians was in part an issue about racism, and I got absolutely skewered. James White even torched me on the DL over it. Then I pointed out MacArthur made the same claim, and the criticism stopped
“For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions” - 2 Timothy 4:3 // I think many of us have applied this danger in the modern age to prosperity preachers...
...and other “feel good” teachers (the inspirational moralists of the attractional church). And it *does* apply to the allure of those types. But not sure as many of us saw it applying to politicians and political pundits and social media conspiracists. But it most certainly does
Many professing believers are filling their ears with voices that simply tell them what they want to hear — affirming their grievances, confirming their suspicions, stroking their idols, stoking their anger.
Many people have been church hopping this season because they didn't see joining a church in the first place as joining a family so much as a vibe. Having to meet different hours, different places, different ways -- that changes the vibe. So they're looking elsewhere.
We don't do family like that. Or we shouldn't. If Grandma said, "Next Thanksgiving we're gonna eat outside" we wouldn't find a new grandma. You could tell Grandma you don't like it. That you wish we could go back inside. But you're there Thanksgiving eating her food.
Don't treat church like a consumer product. Church is a family, not a club, a program, or a style preference.
Excellent thread. I'm seeing this too and expecting more of it. I'm not a prophet or a son of a prophet, but I suspect there is a great refining going on right now -- even a pruning. It feels like a great brokenness. And it is. The angry people are finding their way out
As Dean mentions, there are (generally) two types and they are ending up at two kinds of places. For those not compelled to either side, it is tragic and can be discombobulating to feel "caught" in the middle. But this is preferable to "taking up arms" against the brethren
Make your appeals and entreaties, but you'll have to let indignant people go do their indignant thing with other indignant people. There they go to write that hit song "Alone in Our Principles." It's hard. But your church might actually be getting healthier as it "shrinks"