Donna Imam Profile picture
Aug 13, 2019 16 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Statue of Liberty. A thread.

Legal immigrants who are applying for permanent residency do not qualify for or use public assistance programs such as TANF, SNAP or Section 8 Housing.

This is a ploy to rile up right-wing voters and mislead them to believe they do. Let me explain.
The proposed #PublicChargeRule that is about go into effect can be found here:

federalregister.gov/documents/2018…

It applies to people seeking adjustment of status from a visa status such as a work visa (for example like H1B). To adjust status you have to have a sponsor is most cases.
The most common forms of status from which you would apply for permanent residency are as follows:

A.Sponsorship by a family member such as a Permanent Resident or US Citizen spouse or adult US Citizen Child, or an adult US Citizen sibling.
B.Sponsorship by an American Company that can prove your need based on your skills and that they can pay you a prevailing wage.

FYI: This is complicated and takes enormous amount of proof and is a long process that can take years.
C. Self-sponsorship of highly qualified individuals with a PhD from an American institution.

A pretty small category of people qualify in this category and most are working in research at universities or research divisions of fortune 500.
In the case of A most people are normally outside the US if a family member is the sponsor. If you were already in the US you would be on some sort of legal visa status most commonly work visa (H1B) which requires you to be paid a prevailing wage, so it would be highly...
unlikely for you to qualify for any public benefit programs like SNAP or TANF.

In the case of B. You would be on a work visa or H1B which requires you to be paid a prevailing wage, so same issue it would be highly unlikely to able to qualify.
In the case of C, most highly qualified individuals with PhDs applying for permanent residency do so because they have jobs, it would be rare to find a PhD holder not working in industry or at a university while applying.
So the questions:
So who exactly are these people that are legally applying for permanent residency have taken public-benefits? How many of them are there? How much public assistance in terms of dollars have been given to them? Does the government or the DHS have any reason...
to believe that this would impact our budget for public assistance programs?

Or is this just a way to show that this administration is following through on their claims that immigrants take handouts (it's the other way around) re: Statue of Liberty?
It appears the amount of money that we are spending to institute enforcement of the change to the Public Charge Inadmissibility Law greatly outweighs the inconsequential amount of public assistance funds that legal applicants of permanent residency are availing (if any)!
"give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet, and who will not become a public charge." - USCIS director Ken Cuccinelli

Note the words "will not become a #PublicCharge" as in, in the future! How can they determine the future?

And preemptively strike?
This is classic assault on the American fabric of immigrants and vilifying them to divert our attention from important pressing topics

To convince GOP voters that somehow restricting immigration is the solution to healthcare and NOT elimination of for-profit insurance companies
This is the current administration and people who just want to have a job in this administration going along with a concocted problem that doesn't exist.

Instead of solving for $1.52 trillion student loan crisis they are telling you the problem is LEGAL immigrants using SNAP!
Instead of putting a stop to for-profit student loan companies who can and are garnishing the wages of Americans this is the "so called" problem this administration is focusing on.

Instead of figuring out how to increase wages for millions on 2 or 3 jobs this what the want...
you to believe is the problem. That immigrants are taking food stamps and that's a bigger problem than healthcare, education, higher wages.

Don't buy it, don't be distracted. They are not doing their jobs #VoteThemOut. Find someone who will.

Here's why: votefordonna.com/why/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Donna Imam

Donna Imam Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @donnaimamTX

Nov 15, 2021
Elon Musk owns so much stock because he's accumulated the sum off all work product of all his employees: engineers and factory assembly workers, who were not compensated proportionately to the value of their full contributions.
For example, if you’re an engineer and you design or develop products while working for a company, you may get a high salary but the company makes perpetual profits in the millions or billions, off of your work, long after you’ve been paid a fixed salary.
Engineers might even get stock options, an annual bonus or a patent bonus and while that is capped, the company owns the perpetual profit off of that patent. Workers, professional or factory, have no way to demand compensation that is in line with the company's value.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 15, 2020
A thread. We’re NOT all in this together. In Monday's edition of @nprfreshair Nelson Schwartz talks special privileges for the super-rich.

Missing from the discussion is that middle and upper class really don't know what it's like to run out of money and not even have food.
Not Stuck in Traffic: One example is how a venture capitalist wouldn’t even consider an inexpensive yet faster way to fly because for the past decade he’s gotten private helicopter rides to the airport. He has no ability to understand the need or problem being solved.
Lifesaving Healthcare: Another example is how concierge doctors are offering lifesaving solutions to medical problems that even a good-private-health insured person does not get, including the ability to get tested for COVID-19 even if the CDC guidelines are met.
Read 14 tweets
Jan 10, 2020
WW3. A Thread.

The GOP lied to the American people, created a fake war just so they could stay in power, and never admitted they were wrong. They are responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. These families have already lived WW3.
The GOP left tens of thousand of American Veterans disabled, limbs left behind in Iraq, suicidal, in pain physically, and broken mentally. Families ripped apart. Children without parents. Parents without children. These families have already lived WW3.
The last GOP president bankrupt our country, leaving it and us Americans in economic shambles for over a decade. Jobs lost, pensions and 401Ks drained, and homes foreclosed. The current GOP president has been unsuccessful in every single foreign policy endeavor while in office.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 12, 2019
Private health insurance jobs lost argument is illogical. Here's why. Thread.

👉 There are ~160X+ more people without care that could DIE vs. low-wage pvt. health ins. jobs. Death vs. New Job.

👉 Medicare only covers ~44M. That means single-payer will create 100Ks of jobs.
👉 Healthcare for All (HCA) which I am proposing, accelerates single-payer M4A, increases the number of primary care physicians and SCALES the infrastructure. It will create hundreds of thousands high-wage jobs. Jobs that people from the pvt. health ins ind. can transition to.
👉 RealPay for All (RPA) which I am proposing will ensure that pvt. health insurance employees that today make less than $15/hr will be paid a thriving wage (NOT a get-by-in-debt living wage). Thriving wage: able to live where you work, save to buy a home and retire someday.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 29, 2019
Turning Texas Blue and the Consequences for America.

A thread.

I'm Donna Imam, a Computer Engineer from Austin Texas running for US Congress in the northern suburbs of Austin Williamson and Bell Counties aka #TX31. Here’s “Why I’m Running for Congress”: votefordonna.com/why
Why should you care? Because this district #TX31 is 2.9% from flipping BLUE.

Why does that matter? Texas is gerrymandered and this district has been red from its inception. In 2018 Williamson County already went BLUE. As an engineer and emerging tech researcher I got curious.
So I spent the last 6 months researching this district myself personally and what I found was astounding!

Texas Democrats are politically disengaged. They do not believe that Texas can be BLUE, or their vote could matter, so they stay home and don’t show for primary elections
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(