Question for @NatashaBertrand, who retweeted this: doesn't this mean Rusal America was formed in April 2016, but no Kentucky filing was made until August 2018? As the Rusal sanctions weren't in place until April 2018, are we certain there's anything suspicious about this at all?
@NatashaBertrand 1/ In WA, the incorporation date is listed as February '18. What Scott posted may just mean Rusal America was unofficially formed in 2016 but not incorporated until later. It formed soon after Manafort joined Trump's campaign, but not sure that means much. opengovwa.com/corporation/60…
@NatashaBertrand 2/ Update: Scott says they incorporated in Delaware in 1999. So without more information on what precisely was "formed" in April 2016 (and where) I'm not sure an August 2018 filing in Kentucky, as Rusal and the feds were negotiating the dropping of sanctions on Rusal, means much.
@NatashaBertrand 3/ For all we know (without some expert eyes on this) all this means is that "Registered Agents, Inc." (Rusal's representative for purposes of this filing but not, apparently, part of or otherwise connected to Rusal or Rusal America) was formed in Kentucky (or generally) in 2016.
@NatashaBertrand 4/ From @dodger_lou, below, via the Kentucky SOS site, it seems Registered Agents, Inc. acted on behalf of Rusal America in Kentucky beginning April 2016, which suggests Rusal (which wasn't under sanctions until 2018) initiated its Kentucky plans during or before election season.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou 5/ So—as @ScottMStedman is intimating—this suggests a *possibility* Deripaska (who came to Rusal many years earlier) was infiltrating McConnell's office as he was infiltrating Trump's campaign (Spring '16) and Mitch might've had other motives to block Obama's statement on Russia.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 6/ Deripaska is Suspect #1 in Russian election collusion (on the Kremlin side); the evidence—from the Nastya Rybka chronicles to the activities of his plane before/after the election, from Manafort-Kilimnik meetings to Boyarkin's threats against Manafort—is becoming overwhelming.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 7/ That said, we needn't assume incipient Rusal outreach to Kentucky—which may/may not have reached McConnell's ears by spring 2016Z—was the basis for McConnell blocking Obama from warning America about Russian election interference. It also could've been "simple" dirty politics.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 8/ A reason for caution is a) Trump was the only GOP primary candidate who favored dropping all sanctions on Russia; b) Rusal wasn't sanctioned until 2018; and c) #MoscowMitch didn't support Trump until he had to—so a McConnell/Russia plot in Spring '16 makes somewhat less sense.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 9/ So what Scott found gives—with more investigation—#MoscowMitch good reason to feel warmth toward Russia by 2016 at least, and to support lifting sanctions on Rusal in late '18/early '19, but isn't necessarily evidence of criminally conspiratorial conduct (versus realpolitik).
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 10/ The most compelling end of this is Deripaska's: he was seeking to insinuate himself in American politics in any way possible, and the culmination of *one* of his angles on that score—getting a presence in the home state of #MoscowMitch—*culminated* in early '16 at the latest.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 11/ It's in early February '16 that Manafort tells Barrack "I have to get to Trump"; as soon as he's hired, he communicates to Deripaska agents he's in his role to make them happy. So we likely need to set the clock on Deripaska's in-roads into US politics in *'15* at the latest.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 12/ Why does that matter? Well, the *latest* date we have for Flynn communicating directly to Putin that the "grand bargain" can be accomplished via Trump is early December 2015. So Deripaska being ready to start moving his pieces onto the board by then at the latest makes sense.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 13/ It's 120 days from Flynn/his son's secret visit with Russian ambassador Kislyak at his DC home to illegally negotiate U.S. foreign policy under a prospective Trump administration to the date that Rusal America makes its presence felt in Kentucky (formation, not registration).
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 14/ 120 days seems a reasonable period from Flynn signaling Trump was on board with the "grand bargain" to Putin's agent Deripaska not just getting his former employee in place with Trump but also making inroads with others—like #MoscowMitch who could be pressed to support Trump.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 15/ It was clear, between December 2015 and April 2016, that Republican leadership was *not* with Trump, *and* that Trump being the only GOP primary candidate with a plan to drop all Crimea sanctions (Rusal sanctions didn't exist yet). So getting to/toward #MoscowMitch was *key*.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS/ That's why I say the document Scott posted is helpful in establishing a timeline for Deripaska's investment in the Kremlin's interference plans, whose 2 phases began in 2014 and 2015 but which didn't—many don't realize this—turn to active support of *Trump* until spring 2016.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS2/ Remember, the Red Sea Conspiracy—the agreement by Russian allies in the Middle East (the leaders of 3 Sunni Arab nations in particular) to seek a "grand bargain" with Trump and Russia—was hatched in October/November 2015 on the Red Sea. Flynn headed to Russia *right after*.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS3/ A longstanding mystery has been that Putin planned to steal DNC data and engage in psy-ops on U.S. voters in 2014/early 2015, but when did he turn to *Trump*? Was it—in fact—once the "grand bargain" was set in fall 2015 (dovetailing with Flynn efforts that began June 2015)?
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS4/ If—as the evidence suggests—Deripaska was the key oligarch in Putin's *infiltration* plans (as opposed to hacking/psy-ops), the "grand bargain" theory of the case has Deripaska being ready to move on infiltrating Trump's campaign and #MoscowMitch in December '15/January '16.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS5/ From that standpoint, Rusal America creating its Kentucky presence <60 days after Manafort tells Barrack he "has to get to Trump" makes a *lot* of sense. Whereas, in contrast, if Rusal America had shown up in Kentucky in (say) early 2013 it would've made little sense at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ICE used to be a legal operation. Now—without it ever confirming for a judge it has the right person and has a reasonable basis to take irrevocable government action—this is a kidnapping.
If you see something like this, report it to the police.
What the police can do is contact ICE to confirm it conducted an operation that resulted in the seizure of a specific person.
If ICE refuses to confirm the seizure of that person at that time, the police have a Kidnapping on their hands.
They'll be required to act accordingly.
If ICE confirms the seizure of that person at that time, the police can ask when the court hearing for the seized person is so friends and/or family reporting a Kidnapping will be able to attend and speak on the seized person's behalf. If ICE refuses to provide the information...
More than any two men in America, Trump and Musk target for vicious retribution anyone who crosses them.
And more than any two men in America, Trump and Musk complain about media using anonymous sources to report on them.
Just take a moment and sit with those two statements.
The question here is why Trump and Musk have such a penchant for *creating* the phenomena they'll later loudly claim to be victims of.
One answer is that they're both malignant narcissistic sociopaths who can't process empathy and therefore can't put themselves in others' shoes.
But the other answer I have found, as a biographer of both men, is that they desperately need public attention to be on them at all times. They need a piece of all our lives in a way that is actually *clinical*—narcissists literally don't know how to process being widely ignored.
They’re destroying our government—and with it, America.
They’re coming for your Social Security. Your student loans. Your voting systems. Your personal data. Your Medicare. Your freedoms.
They want EVERYTHING. And they are coming for EVERYTHING.
From The Washington Post:
Never forget what these people did. They stormed OUR Capitol. They threatened OUR government. They tried to overthrow OUR democracy. They tried to block the presidency WE voted for in 2020.
And when 1,600+ of these lunatic criminals were finally rounded up, they PARDONED them.
Don’t let them rewrite history. THEY attacked our democracy with violence. THEY declared that they’d rather have Vladimir Putin as president than Joe Biden. THEY declared American democracy an outmoded form of government. THEY let billionaires buy our government.
1/ The odds of a second Civil War in the next 20 months are assessed at about 70%, and this assessment was reached after a lengthy conversation between the only bestselling biographer of both Donald Trump _and_ Elon Musk and what is probably the best AI out there at the moment.
2/ More importantly, this conversation _shows its work_. Every claim is sourced, all hard data is historicized, sourced and explained, and the two participants leave no doubt whatsoever as to _exactly_ how this assessment was reached.
Twitter users who aren't Trump biographers love to say they know the Trump-Russia scandal—and know it to be a hoax.
So let's have a contest.
I'll put a 🛎 after the first comment that answers one question correctly: What was Trump's first defense to allegations of a "pee tape"?
{I suppose it goes without saying that—like all "innocent" men—Trump gave many different defenses to the possibility (confirmed as *fact* by the CIA, per the BBC) that Putin has compromising tapes of him, all contradictory. I'm only looking for the first.} bbc.com/news/world-us-…
(PS) One thing I will also do is identify as *close* any reference any commenter makes to a defense that Trump did offer to the allegation, among the possibly dozens he offered.
I will write, "That was a defense! But not the first one." That will make this even more educational.
(🧵) Elongelicals insist this Musk sentiment is right and defend it.
What makes that so interesting isn’t Musk’s antisemitism—he’s a hardcore antisemite—but that he's *encouraging* analogies between 2025 America and Nazi Germany.
1/ Hitler was responsible for millions and millions of deaths—some on battlefields in a war he started, some in concentration camps. Which deaths, precisely, is Musk attributing to career German civil servants who were in government before Hitler came to power and stayed at work?
2/ All Western Front battlefield deaths are attributable to Hitler’s psychopathic military adventurism—which was his decision the same way Putin invaded Georgia, Ukraine and Chechnya and the same way Trump is now threatening to invade annex Canada and invade Greenland and Panama.