Question for @NatashaBertrand, who retweeted this: doesn't this mean Rusal America was formed in April 2016, but no Kentucky filing was made until August 2018? As the Rusal sanctions weren't in place until April 2018, are we certain there's anything suspicious about this at all?
@NatashaBertrand 1/ In WA, the incorporation date is listed as February '18. What Scott posted may just mean Rusal America was unofficially formed in 2016 but not incorporated until later. It formed soon after Manafort joined Trump's campaign, but not sure that means much. opengovwa.com/corporation/60…
@NatashaBertrand 2/ Update: Scott says they incorporated in Delaware in 1999. So without more information on what precisely was "formed" in April 2016 (and where) I'm not sure an August 2018 filing in Kentucky, as Rusal and the feds were negotiating the dropping of sanctions on Rusal, means much.
@NatashaBertrand 3/ For all we know (without some expert eyes on this) all this means is that "Registered Agents, Inc." (Rusal's representative for purposes of this filing but not, apparently, part of or otherwise connected to Rusal or Rusal America) was formed in Kentucky (or generally) in 2016.
@NatashaBertrand 4/ From @dodger_lou, below, via the Kentucky SOS site, it seems Registered Agents, Inc. acted on behalf of Rusal America in Kentucky beginning April 2016, which suggests Rusal (which wasn't under sanctions until 2018) initiated its Kentucky plans during or before election season.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou 5/ So—as @ScottMStedman is intimating—this suggests a *possibility* Deripaska (who came to Rusal many years earlier) was infiltrating McConnell's office as he was infiltrating Trump's campaign (Spring '16) and Mitch might've had other motives to block Obama's statement on Russia.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 6/ Deripaska is Suspect #1 in Russian election collusion (on the Kremlin side); the evidence—from the Nastya Rybka chronicles to the activities of his plane before/after the election, from Manafort-Kilimnik meetings to Boyarkin's threats against Manafort—is becoming overwhelming.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 7/ That said, we needn't assume incipient Rusal outreach to Kentucky—which may/may not have reached McConnell's ears by spring 2016Z—was the basis for McConnell blocking Obama from warning America about Russian election interference. It also could've been "simple" dirty politics.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 8/ A reason for caution is a) Trump was the only GOP primary candidate who favored dropping all sanctions on Russia; b) Rusal wasn't sanctioned until 2018; and c) #MoscowMitch didn't support Trump until he had to—so a McConnell/Russia plot in Spring '16 makes somewhat less sense.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 9/ So what Scott found gives—with more investigation—#MoscowMitch good reason to feel warmth toward Russia by 2016 at least, and to support lifting sanctions on Rusal in late '18/early '19, but isn't necessarily evidence of criminally conspiratorial conduct (versus realpolitik).
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 10/ The most compelling end of this is Deripaska's: he was seeking to insinuate himself in American politics in any way possible, and the culmination of *one* of his angles on that score—getting a presence in the home state of #MoscowMitch—*culminated* in early '16 at the latest.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 11/ It's in early February '16 that Manafort tells Barrack "I have to get to Trump"; as soon as he's hired, he communicates to Deripaska agents he's in his role to make them happy. So we likely need to set the clock on Deripaska's in-roads into US politics in *'15* at the latest.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 12/ Why does that matter? Well, the *latest* date we have for Flynn communicating directly to Putin that the "grand bargain" can be accomplished via Trump is early December 2015. So Deripaska being ready to start moving his pieces onto the board by then at the latest makes sense.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 13/ It's 120 days from Flynn/his son's secret visit with Russian ambassador Kislyak at his DC home to illegally negotiate U.S. foreign policy under a prospective Trump administration to the date that Rusal America makes its presence felt in Kentucky (formation, not registration).
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 14/ 120 days seems a reasonable period from Flynn signaling Trump was on board with the "grand bargain" to Putin's agent Deripaska not just getting his former employee in place with Trump but also making inroads with others—like #MoscowMitch who could be pressed to support Trump.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 15/ It was clear, between December 2015 and April 2016, that Republican leadership was *not* with Trump, *and* that Trump being the only GOP primary candidate with a plan to drop all Crimea sanctions (Rusal sanctions didn't exist yet). So getting to/toward #MoscowMitch was *key*.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS/ That's why I say the document Scott posted is helpful in establishing a timeline for Deripaska's investment in the Kremlin's interference plans, whose 2 phases began in 2014 and 2015 but which didn't—many don't realize this—turn to active support of *Trump* until spring 2016.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS2/ Remember, the Red Sea Conspiracy—the agreement by Russian allies in the Middle East (the leaders of 3 Sunni Arab nations in particular) to seek a "grand bargain" with Trump and Russia—was hatched in October/November 2015 on the Red Sea. Flynn headed to Russia *right after*.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS3/ A longstanding mystery has been that Putin planned to steal DNC data and engage in psy-ops on U.S. voters in 2014/early 2015, but when did he turn to *Trump*? Was it—in fact—once the "grand bargain" was set in fall 2015 (dovetailing with Flynn efforts that began June 2015)?
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS4/ If—as the evidence suggests—Deripaska was the key oligarch in Putin's *infiltration* plans (as opposed to hacking/psy-ops), the "grand bargain" theory of the case has Deripaska being ready to move on infiltrating Trump's campaign and #MoscowMitch in December '15/January '16.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS5/ From that standpoint, Rusal America creating its Kentucky presence <60 days after Manafort tells Barrack he "has to get to Trump" makes a *lot* of sense. Whereas, in contrast, if Rusal America had shown up in Kentucky in (say) early 2013 it would've made little sense at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here it is: the new PROOF report on Musk. Massive, fully sourced, horrifying. The silver lining is that what Musk is up to and what he wants is becoming clearer.
America is in the shitter because we have people who have never read the Constitution talking about the Constitution, people who do not know what the Second Amendment says talking about the Second Amendment, and people pretending to know what Marxism and socialism are who do not.
Maybe one in 100 people on this f****** hellsite talking about CRT know what it is.
Maybe one in 100 people on this f****** hellsite talking about the Green New Deal know what it is.
MAGA is weakness. It is foisting your stupidity on the world because you simply cannot face it.
Bezos is paying the Trumps $40 million to make a documentary on Melania that no one asked for or wants and is certain to obscure any interesting fact—like her initial immigration status, whether her marriage is a sham, Trump’s affairs—a viewer might want.
Seems like... Bribery?
To put this in perspective—I’ll use myself as an example only because I know my situation best—I wrote the largest number of bestsellers about Trump of any author (tied with Woodward). Do you think Bezos—who follows me on Twitter—would pay $40 million for the rights? Or even $40?
My point isn’t about me. I make no effort to shop the Proof Series rights.
My point is Bezos knows me: and I know, he knows, everyone knows he could get rights to a 3,500-page bestselling epic on the Trumps for 400K—1% of what he’s paying for Melania’s lies—and it won’t happen.
I have no quarrel with Tosca, but she's not objective in this.
Many people are worried about Musk, and my opinion—just as a person, rather than a historian, attorney, journalist, retired professor, editor, author, and biographer of her brother—is that he needs his family's help.
I'm not a doctor, psychologist or psychiatrist; my PhD is nonmedical. But I was also a public defender for years and years, so I have worked for and with and around individuals suffering from mental illness more than most readers will know. Musk is acting in a very troubling way.
His employees came close to calling in a police-conducted wellness check, per a recent book. He has admitted to both being mentally ill and being under medical supervision for it via experimental drug therapy. He has admitted to crippling stress. And he is acting in a manic way.
I legitimately believe Elon Musk may be going mad. I'm a Musk biographer who has been tracking his online behavior for the last two years—and given that he's admitted to all of mental illness, heavy drug use, and crippling stress, it is now reasonable to fear he is deeply unwell.
His private struggles would not be of general concern except they have dramatic public consequences.
His holdings across many civilization-essential industries and the fact that he's the incoming POTUS mean that his madness and increasing incitement of violence endanger us all.
For 14 days more the administration is in a position to take urgent action to protect America from Elon Musk. That could include ending all U.S. contracts with him, filing lawsuits to block his unconstitutional DOGE initiative, and launching new federal and natsec investigations.
1/ What some of you do not realize is that there are a small number of MAGAs who believe, if erroneously, that they are actually pursuing principles.
They do not know what free speech actually entails in a representative democracy but they do believe in what they think it means.
2/ I'm not going to say these people can be redeemed. They can't. They supported a rapist career criminal for President of the United States and an unelected neo-Nazi to be his co-POTUS.
Some things are unforgivable; that alone—had they done nothing else—would be one such thing.