Question for @NatashaBertrand, who retweeted this: doesn't this mean Rusal America was formed in April 2016, but no Kentucky filing was made until August 2018? As the Rusal sanctions weren't in place until April 2018, are we certain there's anything suspicious about this at all?
@NatashaBertrand 1/ In WA, the incorporation date is listed as February '18. What Scott posted may just mean Rusal America was unofficially formed in 2016 but not incorporated until later. It formed soon after Manafort joined Trump's campaign, but not sure that means much. opengovwa.com/corporation/60…
@NatashaBertrand 2/ Update: Scott says they incorporated in Delaware in 1999. So without more information on what precisely was "formed" in April 2016 (and where) I'm not sure an August 2018 filing in Kentucky, as Rusal and the feds were negotiating the dropping of sanctions on Rusal, means much.
@NatashaBertrand 3/ For all we know (without some expert eyes on this) all this means is that "Registered Agents, Inc." (Rusal's representative for purposes of this filing but not, apparently, part of or otherwise connected to Rusal or Rusal America) was formed in Kentucky (or generally) in 2016.
@NatashaBertrand 4/ From @dodger_lou, below, via the Kentucky SOS site, it seems Registered Agents, Inc. acted on behalf of Rusal America in Kentucky beginning April 2016, which suggests Rusal (which wasn't under sanctions until 2018) initiated its Kentucky plans during or before election season.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou 5/ So—as @ScottMStedman is intimating—this suggests a *possibility* Deripaska (who came to Rusal many years earlier) was infiltrating McConnell's office as he was infiltrating Trump's campaign (Spring '16) and Mitch might've had other motives to block Obama's statement on Russia.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 6/ Deripaska is Suspect #1 in Russian election collusion (on the Kremlin side); the evidence—from the Nastya Rybka chronicles to the activities of his plane before/after the election, from Manafort-Kilimnik meetings to Boyarkin's threats against Manafort—is becoming overwhelming.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 7/ That said, we needn't assume incipient Rusal outreach to Kentucky—which may/may not have reached McConnell's ears by spring 2016Z—was the basis for McConnell blocking Obama from warning America about Russian election interference. It also could've been "simple" dirty politics.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 8/ A reason for caution is a) Trump was the only GOP primary candidate who favored dropping all sanctions on Russia; b) Rusal wasn't sanctioned until 2018; and c) #MoscowMitch didn't support Trump until he had to—so a McConnell/Russia plot in Spring '16 makes somewhat less sense.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 9/ So what Scott found gives—with more investigation—#MoscowMitch good reason to feel warmth toward Russia by 2016 at least, and to support lifting sanctions on Rusal in late '18/early '19, but isn't necessarily evidence of criminally conspiratorial conduct (versus realpolitik).
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 10/ The most compelling end of this is Deripaska's: he was seeking to insinuate himself in American politics in any way possible, and the culmination of *one* of his angles on that score—getting a presence in the home state of #MoscowMitch—*culminated* in early '16 at the latest.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 11/ It's in early February '16 that Manafort tells Barrack "I have to get to Trump"; as soon as he's hired, he communicates to Deripaska agents he's in his role to make them happy. So we likely need to set the clock on Deripaska's in-roads into US politics in *'15* at the latest.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 12/ Why does that matter? Well, the *latest* date we have for Flynn communicating directly to Putin that the "grand bargain" can be accomplished via Trump is early December 2015. So Deripaska being ready to start moving his pieces onto the board by then at the latest makes sense.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 13/ It's 120 days from Flynn/his son's secret visit with Russian ambassador Kislyak at his DC home to illegally negotiate U.S. foreign policy under a prospective Trump administration to the date that Rusal America makes its presence felt in Kentucky (formation, not registration).
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 14/ 120 days seems a reasonable period from Flynn signaling Trump was on board with the "grand bargain" to Putin's agent Deripaska not just getting his former employee in place with Trump but also making inroads with others—like #MoscowMitch who could be pressed to support Trump.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman 15/ It was clear, between December 2015 and April 2016, that Republican leadership was *not* with Trump, *and* that Trump being the only GOP primary candidate with a plan to drop all Crimea sanctions (Rusal sanctions didn't exist yet). So getting to/toward #MoscowMitch was *key*.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS/ That's why I say the document Scott posted is helpful in establishing a timeline for Deripaska's investment in the Kremlin's interference plans, whose 2 phases began in 2014 and 2015 but which didn't—many don't realize this—turn to active support of *Trump* until spring 2016.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS2/ Remember, the Red Sea Conspiracy—the agreement by Russian allies in the Middle East (the leaders of 3 Sunni Arab nations in particular) to seek a "grand bargain" with Trump and Russia—was hatched in October/November 2015 on the Red Sea. Flynn headed to Russia *right after*.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS3/ A longstanding mystery has been that Putin planned to steal DNC data and engage in psy-ops on U.S. voters in 2014/early 2015, but when did he turn to *Trump*? Was it—in fact—once the "grand bargain" was set in fall 2015 (dovetailing with Flynn efforts that began June 2015)?
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS4/ If—as the evidence suggests—Deripaska was the key oligarch in Putin's *infiltration* plans (as opposed to hacking/psy-ops), the "grand bargain" theory of the case has Deripaska being ready to move on infiltrating Trump's campaign and #MoscowMitch in December '15/January '16.
@NatashaBertrand@dodger_lou@ScottMStedman PS5/ From that standpoint, Rusal America creating its Kentucky presence <60 days after Manafort tells Barrack he "has to get to Trump" makes a *lot* of sense. Whereas, in contrast, if Rusal America had shown up in Kentucky in (say) early 2013 it would've made little sense at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If I'd told you that on the evening of July 4th on the nation's 250th birthday it would be 11:15PM, Trump would not yet have spoken, there would only be a few hundred people in attendance, and the event stage would be featuring a foreign opera, you would've had me committed
Whoa he just showed up and he looks absolutely livid at the tiny, low-energy crowd
Every time he strays from his milquetoast script it is either to make up lies about a Communist threat, babble repetitiously, or whine about how he has been treated
This crowd is so small I kid you not you can hear *individual people* cheering
(🚨) So to be very clear, FIFA rules do *not* allow the USMNT to appeal the Balogun red card *on the basis of claiming the referee erred*.
But.
Under the circumstances, the USMNT should appeal on the very different grounds ESPN just reported on: misapplication of VAR protocols.
As ESPN explains, there's no doubt the card was issued on the basis of still images and slow-mo vids shown to the ref by VAR—and we know this because the ref didn't think the play was even a *yellow* card in real time. But such evidence can't be sent to a ref *in this situation*.
So considering the situation—the USMNT facing the biggest game in its history without its best player by far because of a red card almost the entire world agrees was absurd—it would be *scandalous* if the USMNT didn't at least *try* to appeal on the technical basis of VAR misuse.
It is not that the phrase Trump insisted be on new passports confirms that he doesn't know what a passport is.
It's that for a year not one person who works for him was willing to tell him so.
They will remain cowards when he declares martial law.
Donald Trump is a rabid dog. He has been a menace his whole life, assaulting and raping and defrauding with impunity. That is no longer news. What is news is that he is surrounded by an impenetrable cloud of cowardice. No one will stop him from the things he is about to do to us.
Because he's not just a rabid dog and a moral troglodyte but a knuckle-dragging moron, Trump told everyone around him to put a message on new passports that only makes sense if you've no idea what a passport is. No one stopped him. Not one corrected him.
(🚨) A day after an orc lieutenant of Elon Musk, Gad Saad, put a Canadian mosque community at risk by lying about it using a public loudspeaker for its call to prayer, Saad has now published—and Musk again reposted—a snuff-porn-adjacent film in which a white man massacres Muslims
(PS) 24 hours before *that*, Musk reposted a thread implicitly calling for a UK race-and-religion war.
Casual observers could easily see the last 48 hours as being Musk losing more money than any human ever has while trying to incite mass murder.
Humanity is telling Musk fans they’re worshipping one of the most evil men alive. Instead of reading the thousands of reliable reports establishing why this is being said, these ghouls—because they’ve invested in Musk companies—do nothing. They’re exactly what you think they are.
Process the fact that—as of yesterday—if a tourist so much as dips a finger in the Reflecting Pool Trump ruined they get detained for an hour by multiple federal agencies
This is the police state Republicans hysterically warned of for decades, and now that it's here they love it
And if you wonder why the regime is detaining anyone who interacts with the Pool, it is—nakedly and unambiguously—because it needs false arrests to create the impression of civilian criminal activity that doesn't exist and is merely cover for Trump driving The Beast on the Pool
So Trump, using taxpayer cash, overpaid a Bribery-accused ex-con pal by 1000% via a no-bid contract with kickbacks, that guy ruined the Reflecting Pool, Trump then drove on the Pool out of laziness and further destroyed it, and now they're arresting civilians to cover their asses
There are men in CECOT—the worst prison on Earth—for wearing their hair too long. For loitering. For petty theft. For having the wrong politics.
And Musk and his peons applaud this for the same reason fascists always do: they’re sure it’ll never be them.
They’re *always* wrong.
That’s why Trump hates the study of history. He doesn’t want MAGAs imagining that CECOT may one day be run by Communists.
The prison system you want is the one that you’d deem fair *whatever* your politics are. Because the weapons you use will *always* end up used against you.
Crime rates are the product of hundreds of factors. They tend to be highest in places where policy is based on politics, not expertise. That’s why red states incarcerate the most people *and* have the most crime. Because we need experts setting complex policy, not partisanship.