Hello America. I’m a mostly rational, gay man and journalist from a working class background who lives in New York City and formerly worked for leftwing media. Let me explain a bit what’s going on here with this very upset white liberal. THREAD
Firstly, you are Twitter verified for no apparent reason, with only 1,000 followers, no bylines or actual cultural relevancy. So you either sucked a dick or paid someone for that check mark. Nice work.
You come off as one of those True Believers, a subset encompassing fringe lefty Americans that have grabbed the mic to espouse bizarre, off-putting conspiracy theories about racism and President Trump. You live in a bubble, and that bubble is also digital.
I live in the ghetto, somewhere you’ve never been. I can wear a MAGA hat to the corner store, full of black and brown people, with no problem. None. But if I take that hat to a gay bar, or any twee hipster establishment, may the Lord be with me. I’ll get assaulted. It’s happened.
MAGA hats aren’t symbols of hated or intolerance. They expose hatred and intolerance, from brainwashed, frightened elites. Case in point.
Instead of being open, curious, or interested in the world and your fellow countrymen, you chose hysteria and irrationality. Maybe because it gives you a sense of identity, purpose, and meaning. Boring people need that. But it’s not reality.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are two types of biological males who get into women's athletics. The first is mediocre/failed competitors in men's leagues who see an easy way to score success, fame, money, and scholarships. /1
The second are autogynephiles--the inconvenient truth of the trans movement--extreme misogynists who get a sexual thrill from humiliating women, embarrassing women, or being in women-only spaces. They've completely taken over the "trans movement," and GLAAD, it would appear. /2
Why else would there be so many "trans women" who identify as lesbian? If there's no difference between "trans women" and women, you'd expect a tiny percentage of them to be "lesbian." But that's not the case, at all. In fact, autogynephiles are the face of the trans movement /3
The gay left aren’t sending their best. Re: “Trump argued for workplace discrimination against LGBTs 🥴” No, queens, here’s what happened: THREAD
A case was brought to the DOJ about a man being fired because he’s gay. The DOJ is a part of the Executive Branch of gov. As I’m sure all you lefty geniuses realize, the Executive Branch enforces laws. It doesn’t make laws or interpret laws, that’s the job of the other 2 branches
There is no written law that says you can’t be fired for being gay. That’s not Trump’s fault. Blame Congress, blame Obama. The law doesn’t exist. The DOJ saw the case and said, ‘there’s no law against this, Congress hasn’t passed a law, therefore this firing is LEGAL’
But on a serious note, it's no secret that the alphabet coalition despises white gay men--the very group that founded the gay rights movement--because as LGBTQ+ has been taken over by Marxism, it views "white" and "male" privilege as trumping "gay." Yesterday, when I posted a...
tweet that sounded racist to them (but everything does), they saw a "gotcha" moment, believing they'd stumbled upon one of these naturally racist white gays that they're always banging on about. The truth is, these people had ever heard of me and weren't aware that my whole deal-
is being snarky about society's sacred cows. And that I'm constantly drawing attention to the divisions and resentments that exist between the Left's various victim group coalitions. That's what was so funny about that tweet, perfectly crafted to upset as many people as possible.
THIS IS HUGE: Facebook just admitted in a federal document that they are, indeed, a publisher, not a platform, and they are demanding First Amendment protections from Laura Loomer's defamation lawsuit. This means, Mark Zuckerberg lied to Congress. docs.reclaimthenet.org/Loomer-v-Faceb…
In the motion, Facebook says, "to the extent Ms. Loomer’s claim targets Facebook’s decision to deactivate her accounts, it is also deficient. Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else’s message."
Facebook also says, "[Loomer] claims Facebook labeled her as a ‘dangerous' person who promotes hate – yet, the First Amendment has long protected such statements because they are opinions that are not capable of being proven true or false.”
She’s lying. Look at the smile she gives, meant to manipulate the person you’re lying to. It communicates “you believe me, right?” I used to write for NYT, every single word added and cut by an editor MUST be approved by the journalist. It was a meticulous, irritating process.
I’d be on the phone with an editor at 11pm re: a fluff piece where he wanted to change an adjective I used. Another example, “can we remove the word ‘historic?’ Although the building’s 200 years old it’s not on the national historic registry.” She’s lying. It was intentional.
Six seconds in, when she says “They took out the whole sentence.” Her smile is classic deception, it communicates, “you’re buying this, right? We’re on the same page?”
Exclusive: @JussieSmollett has employed PR Firm Sunshine Sachs to defend him. This is the same firm used by Harvey Weinstein to deflect his attacks. Among other horrors. See the thread for links. Why would a hate crime victim need such heavy PR?