OK - now US v. Sean Combs, Day 23, Part 3 trying with full comments back on after Ye left, many said Part 1 thread broken but try try against, Perez still on direct Inner City Press is covering: Week 4 book below, 5 later today; and will live tweet, thread below
[They're back. Before jury in]
Combs' Xavier Donaldson: Your Honor wanted us to address Juror Number Six?
Judge: We can do that another time.
AUSA Comey: After Mr. Perez we have exhibits to introduce so we can get our summary charts together over the weekend
Judge: All rise!
[Jurors enter]
AUSA Smyser: Mr. Perez, were you subpoenaed and do you have an immunity agreement?
Jonathan Perez: Yes
AUSA: Let me show you this - what is it?
Perez: Mr. Combs' Gucci pouch.
AUSA: What was in the Gucci pouch?
Perez: Drugs and money
OK - now US v. Sean Combs, Day 23, Part 2 with comments limited after many said Part 1 thread broken (by Ye?) Perez on direct Inner City Press is covering matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-sean-c……Week 4 book below, 5 later today; and will live tweet, thread below x.com/innercitypress…
AUSA: Mr. Perez, is this your text message?
Jonathan Perez: Yes. It's me, KK and Joey.
AUSA: KK asks, How is the set up going, how much longer do y'all need? What did you write back?
Perez: I wrote, I got fruits and shakes and will ask Jane about outfits
AUSA: Then KK asks, Is room done done yet? How did you respond?
Perez: I wrote, Room is done, now going to store.
AUSA: What store?
Perez: Adult store.
AUSA: Afterward, KK asks about clean up. Of what?
Perez: The room
[Before jury in]
Combs' Agnifilo: The Government's proposed witness for today does not know how the guns were moved and piled in the security room. He has no personal knowledge. We can him excluded.
Judge: He is not an expert witness. He is a fact witness.
AUSA: When he was at the premises, the guns were found in the security room. They can cross examine. There is nothing prejudicial-
Judge: It's not about prejudice. Mr. Agnifilo is going to object to every statement. That's the issue.
Judge: Anything before the jury comes in? Does the defense want to respond to the Government on the juror issue?
Combs' Alexandra Shapiro: This is a thinly veiled attempt to exclude a Black juror.
AUSA: We looked at the record and found a lack of candor
Judge: We'll deal with it before the weekend. Are the jurors ready?
No.
Judge: Well. They we'll take ten minutes.
[Before the jury in]
Judge Subramanian: I am ruling that the Government cannot recall Doctor Hughes for more testimony despite the Second Circuit's decision in US v. Larry Ray
[Book on Ray / Sarah Lawrence College sex cult case: amazon.com/gp/product/B09…
Judge Subramanian: On rule that Jane's notes reflecting alleged fraud to induce her into the hotel nights are admissible, despite the defense's arguments
[US reply about inducement: patreon.com/posts/diddy-do…
[Before jurors in]
Judge: I have the defense's motion to dismiss, but the Government has said they will respond today. I don't have anything from them yet, so we'll address it tomorrow, along with whether Dr. Hughes can be recalled. Motion: patreon.com/posts/diddy-do…
Judge: With that said, let me see lead counsel in the robing room.
[So what is being discussed: the issues around the order on pseudonyms? Did Jane's counsel ever submitted her list of publishers? No indication in the docket despite this: