Thread for anyone interested in signalling in economics and military strategy. Or whoever loves a good story. Setting of the action: Predjama castle, Slovenia. /
As you can guess from the picture, the castle is literally built into the rocks. Rather humid and cold, so you wouldn't recommend this to anyone with rheumatics, but very practical for defence purposes. /
You wouldn't want to besiege this castle unless you really had to - which happened in the 15th century when Erasmus of Lueg, burgrave of Predjama Castle, killed Marshall Pappenheim, a relative of Holy Roman Emperor Frederick 3 /
Obviously, the Holy Roman Emperor couldn't let Erasmus get away with this, and so his troops surrounded the castle. When the defences are too formidable, an obvious alternative is to just let time do it's work and wait until the starving garrisson surrenders /
But, guess what? Not only did the garrisson not appear to starve, but Erasmus actually sent food as a gift to his besiegers, with special treats on Church holidays. For the besiegers, it was clear that this proved that Erasmus had signed an alliance with the devil /
The truth was slightly less schocking: there was a secret passage in the rocks behind the castle, and, unbeknownst to the besiegers, this was used to supply the garrison with ample food. The really smart thing about Erasmus was that, without having a PhD in game theory, he /
understood the value of "signalling": undertaking actions that were costly to him but that showed his invincibility to his ennemies, such as giving away food he could have used himself /
This being said, being smart didn't save him. According to popular accounts, a servant betrayed him and sent a signal to the enemy went Erasmus went to the loo (even strategic geniuses are occasionally full of shit) and the loo was then the target of concentrated catapult fire /
So Erasmus eventually died in every dishonorable position, after having held out for a year. There's probably a moral to this story, but I will leave that to someone else. /
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, het klopt niet helemaal, sommige proffen zijn natuurlijk sadisten, maar dat zijn uitzonderingen. Het punt is dat, zoals Marchant uitlegt, de "buisvakken" (statistiek, economie, bij de ingenieurs thermodynamica 😉) inderdaad gewoon intrinsiek moeilijk zijn, en dat je /
quasi onmogelijk door een paar marathonzittingen juist voor de examens een maandenlange verwaarlozing van het vak kan rechtzetten, tenzij je dus zéér inteliggent bent. En zoals Marchant ook terecht aanhaalt, je kan niet onder een bepaald niveau zwakken zonder dat je vak /
The generals and admirals who planned the invasion of Japan had no idea of the Manhattan project, so the assumptions they used in their planning give an interesting insight in the scale of the massacre that would have taken place without the nuclear bombs. /
Extrapolating from Iwo Jima and Okinawa, it was expected that US casualties would range in the hundreds of thousands (with up to two millions in the most pessimistic scenarios) - at least a doubling of the US body count until then. /
But just as interesting is the impact a continuing of the war would have had on the Japanese population. The US has more or less completely destroyed the Japanese merchant fleet, and Japan was on the brink of a mass starvation that was unseen in history. /
In "Nudge", @R_Thaler and @CassSunstein often argue that neoclassical economics assumes that humans behave as if they're Mr Spock, while, in reality, we behave more like Homer Simpson. There's an implicit assumption in this analogy that Mr Spock is the normative reference/
point : deviations from the Spock standards are suboptimal, and what they call "libertarian paternalism" should nudge people towards the choices they would make if only they were more like Spock. But @juliagalef beautifully illustrates why Spockism is not the right standard for /
rationality when you're not facing fellow Spockians. There are beautiful examples of this in experimental game theory. Consider the game where you have to state a number, and the winner is the person whose number is closest to half of the average guess. How would you play? /
Hidden within the @ITF_Forum report on #micromobility "30 km/h is the maximum limit recommended for cars in city streets to reduce the risk of death or serious injury from a collision of cars with pedestrians and other vulnerable road users."
On the topic of shared micromobility itself: "Shared micromobility predominantly replaces walking, cycling and public transport trips yet could also substitute short car trips. The broadest benefit ...could be increasing
the catchment area of public transport. " /
"Their widespread availability, particularly for first/last-mile connections, could improve access while shortening commuting time and reducing reliance on cars. However, micromobility ... raise concerns of nuisance on sidewalks, the safety of users and pedestrians" /