Here is a gem from Rizwan Salim, published in 1997 in HT: 'What the invaders really did to India':
Savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. (1/n)
(2/n) Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women.
(3/n) Many Indians do not seem to recognise that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth's most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.
(4/n) It is clear that India at the time when Muslim invaders turned towards it (8 to 11th century) was the earth's richest region for its wealth in precious and semi-precious stones, gold and silver, religion and culture, and its fine arts and letters.
(5/n) Tenth century Hindustan was also too far advanced than its contemporaries in the East and the West for its achievements in the realms of speculative philosophy and scientific theorising, mathematics and knowledge of nature's workings.
(6/n) Hindus of the early medieval period were unquestionably superior in more things than the Chinese, the Persians (including the Sassanians), the Romans and the Byzantines of the immediate preceding centuries.
(7/n) The followers of Siva and Vishnu on this subcontinent had created for themselves a society more mentally evolved-joyous and prosperous too-than had been realised by the Jews, Christians, and Muslim monotheists of the time.
(8/n) Ancient Hindu temple architecture is the most awe-inspiring, ornate and spellbinding architectural style found in the world. (Gothic art of cathedrals in France is the only other religious architecture that is comparable with the intricate architecture of Hindu temples).
(9/n) No artist of any historical civilisation has ever revealed the same genius as ancient Hindustan's artists and artisans. Their minds filled with venom against the idol- worshippers of Hindustan, the Muslims destroyed a large number of ancient Hindu temples.
(10/n) This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim chroniclers and others of the time.
A number of temples were merely damaged and remained standing. But a large number-not hundreds but many thousands-of the ancient temples were broken into shreds of cracked stone.
(11/n) In the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact from the ancient times.
They also slaughtered a lot of Hindus. Virtually every Hindu temple built in ancient times is a perfect work of art.
(12/n) So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that, rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through personal example and exhortation, they just built mosques at the sites of torn down temples-and foolishly pretended they had triumphed over minds and culture of Hindus
(13/n) Kailas temple at Ellora indicated a will power, a creative imagination, and an intellect eager to take on the greatest of artistic challenges. The forefathers and descendants of those who built the magnificent temples of Bhojpur and Thanjavur, Konark and Kailas......
(14/n) ....invented mathematics and brain surgery, created mind-body disciplines (yoga) of astonishing power, and built mighty empires would almost certainly have attained technological superiority over Europe.
(15/n) Priceless piece. Must be read in full. Here is the scanned pdf copy of the piece. Sitaram Goel excerpted it in his book 'Hindu Temples - What Happened To Them'.
Must remember: The Abrahamics nurture a deep inferiority complex towards Hinduism, so they try to destroy it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
इक़बाल की रचनाओं से पता चलता है कि २० वीं शदी के प्रारंभ में मुसलमानों के एक प्रबुद्ध वर्ग के क्या चल रहा था।उसने अपनी फारसी शब्दों की बहुलता वाली कविताओं से मुस्लिम समाज को radicalise करने का सफल प्रयास किया। उसने 1910 में तराना ए मिली (मुस्लिम कौम) की रचना की। (1/n)
(2/n) इसके बोल हैं "चीन(मध्य एशिया) ओ अरब हमारा हिंदोस्तां हमारा,मुस्लिम हैं हमवतन हैं सारा जहां हमारा।।
तौहीद (अल्लाह की अद्वितीयता) की अमानत सीनों में है हमारे,आसां नहीं मिटाना नामोनिशां हमारा।।
दुनिया के बुत कदों (मन्दिरों) मैं पहला वो घर खुदा का (काबा),
(3/n)
हम इसके पासबां (रक्षक) हैं,वो पासबां हमारा।।
तेगों (तलवारों) के साए में पल कर जवां हुए हैं,खंजर हिलाल (बाल चंद्र) का है कौमी निशां हमारा।।
मगरिब (मिस्र से स्पेन तक) की वादियों में गूंजी अजां (नमाज़ के लिए आवाज) हमारी,थमता न था किसी से सैल ए रवां (बाढ़ जैसा विस्तार) हमारा।
Mukesh Ambani is now worth $100 billion and Anil Ambani is worth $0.0 billion, within about fifteen years of their split.
Starting as equals, raised by the same parents, educated in the same schools, inheriting same industrial group with same work culture, each in half. (1/5)
(2/5)
So, will the Leftists tell us how many more workers could MA exploit which AA could not? From how many of his neighbours could MA loot his wealth which AA could not?
Fact is that Capital, education, upbringing, inheritance doesn't matter at all.
(3/5)
Either you are an entrepreneur or you are not, and that is all about it. If you are an entrepreneur, you will find your way even in a most thuggish regime, the regime will put an upper limit to what you can achieve, but the limit leaves a lot of room.
Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky 1. "Power is not only what u have but what the enemy thinks you have." 2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people." 3. "Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy." 4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." (1/n)
(2/n) 5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage." 6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
(3/n) 7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." 8. "Keep the pressure on." 9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. "
10."The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."
While the Marxists and Liberal spend hundreds of hour pontificating of inequality in Shastras (which cannot be proved as it is not true), have you ever heard or seen them discussing the Islamic doctrine of Kufu/Kafa'at (equal/equality)? This is institutionalised inequality (1/n)
(2/n) Taken from Hadis, which carry the weight of mandatory doctrine, they state principles of racial inequality - Quraysh are suitable matches for one another as are the (other) Arabs suitable matches for one another.’
(3/n) The ruling relevant to non-Arabs is as follows: ‘An Ajmi (non-Arab) cannot be a match for a woman of Arab descent, no matter that he be an Aalim (religious scholar) or even a Sultan (ruling authority).
#UPSC CS Exam: A boy was asked a question on Chandigarh’s architecture. He gave his unbiased opinion, criticised absence of Indic elements. The Board suddenly turned frosty. Vinay Mittal in the chair with a JNU professor and AIS officers. Got 87/275
Share such stories on DM.
#UPSC Horrors: I’m from Raj. Cat-ST, IITian. Appeared for i’view 2015 CSE. I criticised Naxals, defended Gupta period as golden age of India. Member disagreed nothing golden about it.
Chairman wasn’t even looking at me. I thought I did very well. Got 83/275. Arvind Saxena Board
#UPSC Horrors:
From a sufferer:
Sir..Every upsc aspirant reads The Hindu, which is leftist openly.. it is time UPSC is called out for sourcing its questions from editorials of the hindu...Where slight left tilt is acceptable but slight right tilt leads to butchering of marks
Add one more fact: Instrument of Accession was a legal provision made applicable through Govt of India Act, 1935. Each of the 562 Princely States signed the same document. All of them later signed an Instrument of Merger, except J&K. That’s why 370. Now, J&K also stands merged.
(2/n) When did the exercise of securing the accession start? After 6 June 1947, when the Partition Plan was announced by Mountbatten in great haste, as he was keen to get Britain out of India.
(3/n) A provision for accession existed in the Govt of India Act, 1947, which was made use of by Patel, who managed to get every Princely State on board by 15th August except Hyderabad and J&K. Junagadh signed accession to Pakistan.