इक़बाल की रचनाओं से पता चलता है कि २० वीं शदी के प्रारंभ में मुसलमानों के एक प्रबुद्ध वर्ग के क्या चल रहा था।उसने अपनी फारसी शब्दों की बहुलता वाली कविताओं से मुस्लिम समाज को radicalise करने का सफल प्रयास किया। उसने 1910 में तराना ए मिली (मुस्लिम कौम) की रचना की। (1/n) (2/n) इसके बोल हैं "चीन(मध्य एशिया) ओ अरब हमारा हिंदोस्तां हमारा,मुस्लिम हैं हमवतन हैं सारा जहां हमारा।।
तौहीद (अल्लाह की अद्वितीयता) की अमानत सीनों में है हमारे,आसां नहीं मिटाना नामोनिशां हमारा।।
दुनिया के बुत कदों (मन्दिरों) मैं पहला वो घर खुदा का (काबा),

Mukesh Ambani is now worth $100 billion and Anil Ambani is worth $0.0 billion, within about fifteen years of their split.
Starting as equals, raised by the same parents, educated in the same schools, inheriting same industrial group with same work culture, each in half. (1/5) (2/5)
So, will the Leftists tell us how many more workers could MA exploit which AA could not? From how many of his neighbours could MA loot his wealth which AA could not?
Fact is that Capital, education, upbringing, inheritance doesn't matter at all.

Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky
1. "Power is not only what u have but what the enemy thinks you have."
2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people."
3. "Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy."
4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." (1/n) (2/n)
5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."

While the Marxists and Liberal spend hundreds of hour pontificating of inequality in Shastras (which cannot be proved as it is not true), have you ever heard or seen them discussing the Islamic doctrine of Kufu/Kafa'at (equal/equality)? This is institutionalised inequality (1/n) (2/n) Taken from Hadis, which carry the weight of mandatory doctrine, they state principles of racial inequality - Quraysh are suitable matches for one another as are the (other) Arabs suitable matches for one another.’

#UPSC CS Exam: A boy was asked a question on Chandigarh’s architecture. He gave his unbiased opinion, criticised absence of Indic elements. The Board suddenly turned frosty. Vinay Mittal in the chair with a JNU professor and AIS officers. Got 87/275
Share such stories on DM. #UPSC Horrors: I’m from Raj. Cat-ST, IITian. Appeared for i’view 2015 CSE. I criticised Naxals, defended Gupta period as golden age of India. Member disagreed nothing golden about it.
Chairman wasn’t even looking at me. I thought I did very well. Got 83/275. Arvind Saxena Board

Here is a gem from Rizwan Salim, published in 1997 in HT: 'What the invaders really did to India':
Savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. (1/n) (2/n) Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women.

Add one more fact: Instrument of Accession was a legal provision made applicable through Govt of India Act, 1935. Each of the 562 Princely States signed the same document. All of them later signed an Instrument of Merger, except J&K. That’s why 370. Now, J&K also stands merged.

https://twitter.com/sushantsareen/status/1159123297822339075

(2/n) When did the exercise of securing the accession start? After 6 June 1947, when the Partition Plan was announced by Mountbatten in great haste, as he was keen to get Britain out of India.

Revocation of Art 370 is a brilliantly executed plot over many years.
Proves ‘Where there is will, there is a way’. Summary of a brilliantly executed action follows (1/n) (2/n) Held protracted negotiations with PDP, even agreed to a CMP that was decried by RWs, inveigled Sajjad Lone and formed a Govt with PDP, gave a long rope to @mehboobamufti

I don’t mind distributing the message that lies buried in the ayats of Qur’an. I think all of us can do that. I only hope that this great act of spreading peace does not lead to some Maulanas taking offence. Qur’an be distributed among non-believers so that they know the reality So let’s start. Do send it to the Magistrate Manish Singh:
A rough list:
1:7, 2:19, 2:22 (flat earth), 2:122, 2:191 (kill the Jews), 2:193 (fight the image worshipper), 2:216, 2:221 (prohibition on marrying non-Muslim, apostates be killed), 2:223 (wives are tilth- kheti) (2/n)

Regarding Ashraf, Ajlaf, and Arzal, the distinction is clear. Arab racist like Ibn Taiymaiya even went to the extent of invoking Arab superiority. You can see it among the Shi’a as well. An Ayatollah has to be an Arab, and wear a black turban. Lesser clerics wear white (1/n)

https://twitter.com/sankrant/status/1131772978205585408

Ashraf category is basically related to Arab descent, but in India, it is loftily claimed by Persian descent and Central Asian descent as well. There is a lot of fraud in this too, as false claims have been made through centuries (2/n)

There is no difference between the positions of ulema and Sufi mystics on the issue of war or jihad. ‘Sufism’ on the whole is hardly outside the mainstream of normative Islam on this issue, as on others. Let me dispel 4 myths about Islamic mysticism. The first myth is that there is a wide gap between the activities of the mystic khanqah and those of the scholarly madrasa (and that there is, thus, a vast difference between ‘Sufi’ Islam and normative/mainstream Sunni Islam) #Sufism