Abhishek Manu Singhvi argues that the SC on August 21 had ordered for a hearing on Friday, August 23. Prosecution should not have acted in a way (by arresting Chidambaram on August 21) to render a judicial order ineffective.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in the Court when an order for hearing was passed. His client (CBI) should not have acted in this way then, Singhvi.
#Breaking: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Chidambaram against Delhi High Court order denying him protection from arrest as far as CBI case is concerned. Court says matter is now infructuous.
Chidambaram granted liberty to move appropriate Court for regular bail
Supreme Court now hears the SLP filed in relation to the cases filed by ED against P Chidambaram.
Sibal questions the handing over of certain documents in a sealed cover to the Delhi High Court. He says that P Chidambaram was not aware of these documents/notes.
If they discovered some material between the time FIR was filed and I was arrested, they should have summoned me and interrogated me. They cannot spring it like a surprise in the Court, Sibal.
The Will that was spoken about by SG in the earlier hearing is in public domain. The attachment of properties is known. They cannot just make statements like this. ED's only case is that he is not cooperating. This is not fair, this is media trial, Sibal
SG has contended discovery of large number of mails, bank accounts, among other things. All this was never out to Chidambaram. He was examined by ED thrice and only once by the CBI. Neither agencies put any of this before him.
They have to clarify when these documents and notes were discovered. If it was before questioning, why didn't they confront him and if it was after questioning, then why was he not called again, Sibal
SG says Chidambaram is being evasive but the Court should peruse the questions that were put to him and the responses given by him to ascertain if he was being evasive.
The case is that Karti Chidambaram used his relationship with P Chidambaram to influence public servants to secure ex-post facto FIPB approvals for the downstream investment in INX media, Sibal
The CA Bhaskar Raman got bail, Karti Chidambaram got bail, Indrani and Peter Mukherjea are on default bail and no sanctions have been sought for the six government secretaries till now, Sibal
P Chidambaram is being made vicariously liable. The ED's case seems to be that since he's Karti's father, he must be involved... There is no chargesheet filed naming him so prima facie no offence has been committed, Sibal.
Sibal cites the judgment of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh on the issue of right of an accused for anticipatory bail.
If there is a money trail, there must be documents and the source of the monies traceable. What are they trying to find out? First probe, find out and then seek custody, Sibal
If something is found after probing documents, it should be put before the accused for him to give an explanation. Here it's a one way street where documents are produced in Court but not put before accused, Sibal
Great ignominy and humiliation is attached to an arrest. The moment someone is arrested, you destroy that man. You make believe that the man js guilty. That is what is happening here, Sibal
On the Delhi High Court, Sibal says what is the application of mind of the Judge when certain paragraphs are a word for word, comma for comma copy of the note submitted by the SG?
That is exactly my objection that while he (SG) can put whatever he wishes before the Court but it should be put before me first. These are the procedural issues that need to be addressed in a case which involves personal liberty, Sibal
There is also another serious issue that why was the order reserved for seven month? It took him (Justice Sunil Gaur of the HC) 7 months to decide that there was gravity in the matter, Sibal
Their case is, and it is mentioned in the judgment, that Chidambaram has been evasive during questioning, then Your Lordships must ask for transcripts and decide if he was being evasive, Sibal
They (investigating agencies) are saying that they have cogent evidence against the petitioner and at the same time they say that evidence is yet to be unearthed. Then what is this cogent evidence then? - Sibal
They are claiming that there is apprehension of tampering of evidence. Tampering of what? Properties situated outside? Or bank accounts? If that tampering is possible, my arms must be really long, Sibal
Supreme Court to continue hearing the case tomorrow at 12 noon. P Chidambaram to file a rejoinder to the ED's affidavit. Interim protection from arrest granted to Chidambaram in the ED case to continue till tomorrow.
Supreme Court hears the challenge to the SIR process
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: This is an IA. We have details from 35 to 40 BLOs who have committed suicide. These are all aanganwadi workers , teachers .. Section 32 ROPA notices are being sent to them saying that they will be imprisoned for 2 years if they don't meet deadlines. 50 FIRs have been filed against BLOs in UP. They are taking pride in this.
CJI Surya Kant: See if it is an lawful excercise.. it has to be performed. State can substitute the workers.
#SIR #SupremeCourt
CJI: List 3 employees are provided by the state govt. So ECI has to speak with state government
Sr Adv Maninder Singh: 91 percent process is complete in Tamil Nadu
CJI: are you only on Tamil Nadu..
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: TN is first and also all the states. There was a boy who wanted to attend his wedding.. he was denied and he committed suicide.
CJI: somebody can be unwell.. there can be done other health reasons also...
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: But the electoral officer is their boss and they report to the ECI. States are not on the process.
CJI: state govt deploys these workers. So we can tell the states that wherever workers are facing issues they can be substituted.
Parliament Questions
Sasmit Patra asked about the number of cases filed, disposed and pending before DRTs.
The Government responded that 1,78,172 cases are pending before Debt Recovery Tribunals, along with 66,876 SARFAESI applications, as of 14 November 2025.
Patra asked the Government for forum-wise data on cases filed, disposed and pending before the NCLT, DRTs, SARFAESI recovery forums and erstwhile BIFR.
NCLT:
As of 30 September 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal has:
53,727 total cases filed
Supreme Court to resume hearing today pleas by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and other accused seeking bail in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case.
Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria
#SupremeCourt #UmarKhalid
Sr. Adv. Abhishek Manu Singhvi (for Gulfisha Fatima): I have been in jail for just under 6 years. There is a chargesheet filed on 16.9.2020 but as if it’s a ritual of chargesheets, the supplementary chargesheets are filed continuously… till now we have got 4 supplementary and 1 main. The arrest was in 2020. Even after 2023, the delay is sad, astonishing, and unprecedented.
Singhvi: I seek parity, the high court keeps it pending. Then a new bench takes over. Then the appeals were listed with 8 other Co accused. Then it was released from that bench… whatever reasons, let’s not go into that. Then comes the impugned judgement.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant will deliver the inaugural address at the O.P. Jindal Global University’s international convention on judicial independence today marking the launch of IMAANDAAR (Moot academy) and a discussion on the Kesavananda Bharati verdict with AG R. Venkataramani, SG Tushar Mehta and a host of other Supreme Court judges #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court Justices PS Narasimha, PK Mishra, Aravind Kumar and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta at the event #SupremeCourt
Justice Sanjay Karol and Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra arrive #SupremeCourt @Luthra_Sidharth
Supreme Court hears plea concerning OBC reservation for Maharashtra polls
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: We dispute the Banthia commission report because the motive was to reduce the OBC count and only surnames were taken into account.
CJI Surya Kant: We have today a bench mark .. the Banthia commission. We have also not read it but may have to look at critically now
Jaising: The contempt is disguised way to seek review.
CJI: here order is construed or misconstrued is the contention.
CJI: We will hear this matter in 3 judge benches combination by second week of January
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: then let there be no elections till then
Adv Prashant Bhushan: I appear for a disabled professor. This is a very important issue on free speech and how such stakeholders need to be taken into confidence while having consultations
SG Tushar Mehta: Right now we are not dealing with obscenity. But with perversity. Something needs to be done on user generated content. One can have his own @YouTube channel and....we cannot do everything and anything under the garb of free expression
CJI Surya Kant: It is strange that I create my own channel and keep doing things without being accountable. Yes free speech has to be protected ..suppose there is a program with adult content.. there can be warning in advance with parental control.
AG R Venkataramani: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is proposing to have a meeting. They will do everything possible to have a public consultation
CJI: if some provisions need to be incorporated or something needs amendment
SG: yea being considered. I had a word with the minister.
Indian Broadcast and Digital Foundation counsel: Age classification and warnings are in place. There are Digital Media Ethics Code. This code is subjudice.. it was challenged before various HCs and union filed a transfer and it was transferred to Delhi HC and it is to be heard on January 8. This concerns content it Netflix etc. There are 27 petitions. There are Broadcast complaint commission headed by Justice Gita Mittal. Here the category is different. Here comments were made in a user generated content. Ministry has filed a note saying UGC guidelines they are thinking about.
CJI: what is the single instance of penalty or action ? Self styled bodies will not help..some autonomous bodies are free from the influence from those who are exploit all of this and the state also... as a regulatory measure.