Abhishek Manu Singhvi argues that the SC on August 21 had ordered for a hearing on Friday, August 23. Prosecution should not have acted in a way (by arresting Chidambaram on August 21) to render a judicial order ineffective.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in the Court when an order for hearing was passed. His client (CBI) should not have acted in this way then, Singhvi.
#Breaking: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Chidambaram against Delhi High Court order denying him protection from arrest as far as CBI case is concerned. Court says matter is now infructuous.
Chidambaram granted liberty to move appropriate Court for regular bail
Supreme Court now hears the SLP filed in relation to the cases filed by ED against P Chidambaram.
Sibal questions the handing over of certain documents in a sealed cover to the Delhi High Court. He says that P Chidambaram was not aware of these documents/notes.
If they discovered some material between the time FIR was filed and I was arrested, they should have summoned me and interrogated me. They cannot spring it like a surprise in the Court, Sibal.
The Will that was spoken about by SG in the earlier hearing is in public domain. The attachment of properties is known. They cannot just make statements like this. ED's only case is that he is not cooperating. This is not fair, this is media trial, Sibal
SG has contended discovery of large number of mails, bank accounts, among other things. All this was never out to Chidambaram. He was examined by ED thrice and only once by the CBI. Neither agencies put any of this before him.
They have to clarify when these documents and notes were discovered. If it was before questioning, why didn't they confront him and if it was after questioning, then why was he not called again, Sibal
SG says Chidambaram is being evasive but the Court should peruse the questions that were put to him and the responses given by him to ascertain if he was being evasive.
The case is that Karti Chidambaram used his relationship with P Chidambaram to influence public servants to secure ex-post facto FIPB approvals for the downstream investment in INX media, Sibal
The CA Bhaskar Raman got bail, Karti Chidambaram got bail, Indrani and Peter Mukherjea are on default bail and no sanctions have been sought for the six government secretaries till now, Sibal
P Chidambaram is being made vicariously liable. The ED's case seems to be that since he's Karti's father, he must be involved... There is no chargesheet filed naming him so prima facie no offence has been committed, Sibal.
Sibal cites the judgment of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh on the issue of right of an accused for anticipatory bail.
If there is a money trail, there must be documents and the source of the monies traceable. What are they trying to find out? First probe, find out and then seek custody, Sibal
If something is found after probing documents, it should be put before the accused for him to give an explanation. Here it's a one way street where documents are produced in Court but not put before accused, Sibal
Great ignominy and humiliation is attached to an arrest. The moment someone is arrested, you destroy that man. You make believe that the man js guilty. That is what is happening here, Sibal
On the Delhi High Court, Sibal says what is the application of mind of the Judge when certain paragraphs are a word for word, comma for comma copy of the note submitted by the SG?
That is exactly my objection that while he (SG) can put whatever he wishes before the Court but it should be put before me first. These are the procedural issues that need to be addressed in a case which involves personal liberty, Sibal
There is also another serious issue that why was the order reserved for seven month? It took him (Justice Sunil Gaur of the HC) 7 months to decide that there was gravity in the matter, Sibal
Their case is, and it is mentioned in the judgment, that Chidambaram has been evasive during questioning, then Your Lordships must ask for transcripts and decide if he was being evasive, Sibal
They (investigating agencies) are saying that they have cogent evidence against the petitioner and at the same time they say that evidence is yet to be unearthed. Then what is this cogent evidence then? - Sibal
They are claiming that there is apprehension of tampering of evidence. Tampering of what? Properties situated outside? Or bank accounts? If that tampering is possible, my arms must be really long, Sibal
Supreme Court to continue hearing the case tomorrow at 12 noon. P Chidambaram to file a rejoinder to the ED's affidavit. Interim protection from arrest granted to Chidambaram in the ED case to continue till tomorrow.
Delhi High Court to hear shortly a plea filed by Youth Congress President Udai Bhanu Chib challenging the Sessions Court order staying his bail ex parte.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee to hear the case.
@IYC @UdayBhanuIYC #Bail
Chib was granted bail by a magistrate on Saturday at 3:30 AM. The order was stayed by a Sessions Court the same evening without hearing him.
CJI Surya Kant: Inko cost nahi lagaya high court ne ? Band vand pehene nahi hai.. laga koi dangal me utarne aaye hai.
Justice Bagchi: HC has imposed cost
CJI: Kitne saal hogaye wakalat karte aapko?
Adv: From 1995...
CJI: Who committed the mistake of giving you a license. Please don't file such petitions. People believe you .. how will people trust you if you file all this
Adv: Ideals of RSS is against the Constitution..
Justice Bagchi: if you press further.. we have to increase the costs. You may have a difference of opinion from ideology or politics etc. but that does not give rise to offence or you ask FIR against an authority. For argument stake if parliament passes an illegal law.. is it a crime ?? Please withdraw do not embarrass yourself.
CJI: The petitioner who is a practicing advocate and is present in person states that having realised his bona fide mistake, he does not want to pursue the petition which was filed under BNSS. He also undertakes not to file any such complaint, application / petition in any court or any other format. As with complaint dated 2020 sent to SHO Alwar.
CJI: Petitioner further prays that this court may take a lenient view and exempt him from paying cost as imposed by HC and to further prosecute the petitioner. Taking into consideration the repentance shown by the petitioner, and his undertaking, and also keeping in view other mitigating factors, we direct that para 16 of the impugned judgment of HC shall remain in abeyance indefinitely save and except that it will automatically stand revived if the petitioner does act in any manner directly or indirectly in breach of undertaking given before us.
Supreme Court hears the controversy around establishment of a crematorium near the Isha Yoga Center in Coimbatore
Adv Prashant Bhushan: the community that stays there... do not burn but bury bodies.. now Isha foundation is saying come to this land ..burn body and attain moksha. They are bringing the bodies from Coimbatore and burning it here. They are local tribals..
CJI Surya Kant: Burial has become an expensive affair. Isha Foundation is not a religious service. They are doing some pious work. Its a good work also ..these bodies.. did you sell this land to them? You can only claim that you sold for lawful activity.. but you cannot dictate it to them... Let them find a suitable place for you and compensate you so that you have better living conditions.
Justice Bagchi: this was done to stop the unregulated cremation of bodies.
Bhushan: this violates my fundamental right with the stench coming always...
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: what is Mr Bhushan saying.. lodhi road crematorium is just beside homes..
Bhushan: there are no homes
Roahtgi: what about birbal road and jangpura...
Justice Bagchi: perhaps you should see my more unplanned city... which is right beside the Ganges and homes there as well.
CJI: On our suggestion parties are agreeable to explore a possibility of amicable solution .. so that a compensation can be paid to purchase a residential house at another place of his choice. we urge the parties to settle their dispute amicably. #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court to shortly hear The it's Suo Motu case over a “selective reference” in a Class 8 textbook, published by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), about “corruption” in the judiciary
#SupremeCourt #CorruptionInJudiciary #SuoMotu
After the CJI Surya Kant led bench
expressed strong reservations against such a chapter, NCERT on Wednesday apologised for what it termed a “purely unintentional” inclusion of “inappropriate material” in a Class 8 Social Science textbook and halted its circulation #NCERT
CJI Surya Kant: Is it possible for this court to look at all polluted rivers? We can look at it one by one. We also keep entertaining so many matters and issue directions. .. we also have to see that we entertain matters together. Why to have a multiplicity of issues like this ?
CJI: These suo motu proceedings were initiated by this court pursuant to an order in 2021. The original matter dealt with increased level of pollution in Yamuna river...which led this court to take suo motu cognizance of polluting rivers with sewage affluents. This court considered due to contamination of River Yamuna.. it should be the first issue dealt with. Notices were issued to Uttarakhand, Haryana, Himachal, UP and Delhi and Union of India. There is no gainsaid that Right to live in hygienic conditions with human dignity with clean environment is embodied in Article 21.
CJI: Effect of pollution of water on human health drew attention of this court. Under the legislative scheme (water), CPCB and the SPCB were statutorily obligated to take all necessary measures to ensure that sewage affluent is not discharged into rivers unless it is completely treated and will not deteriorate the quality of water.
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions assailing the #SIR process in West Bengal
Development: Following SC's recent order for deployment of judicial officers to ensure completion of SIR in WB the Calcutta HC has decided to cancel the leaves of all judicial officers @MamataOfficial
CJI Kant: Chief Justice of HC has sent a report. The total human resource deployed is shown. He says there is not much resources.. around 226 retired officers and after adding some more it's 294. Now going by the calculation.. if one officer decides 250 objections.. then it will take 80 days. All servicing civil judges will also be permitted now. That is the way out. Retired officers and serving ones from Odisha and Jharkhand will also be added now.
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: Only NDPS and POCSO court judges have been requisitioned and not the civil judges. If judges from different states come they will not understand Bengali.
CJI: let us go by History. Atleast the states were a part of it at one point of time. So they understand the dialect atleast