Abhishek Manu Singhvi argues that the SC on August 21 had ordered for a hearing on Friday, August 23. Prosecution should not have acted in a way (by arresting Chidambaram on August 21) to render a judicial order ineffective.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in the Court when an order for hearing was passed. His client (CBI) should not have acted in this way then, Singhvi.
#Breaking: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Chidambaram against Delhi High Court order denying him protection from arrest as far as CBI case is concerned. Court says matter is now infructuous.
Chidambaram granted liberty to move appropriate Court for regular bail
Supreme Court now hears the SLP filed in relation to the cases filed by ED against P Chidambaram.
Sibal questions the handing over of certain documents in a sealed cover to the Delhi High Court. He says that P Chidambaram was not aware of these documents/notes.
If they discovered some material between the time FIR was filed and I was arrested, they should have summoned me and interrogated me. They cannot spring it like a surprise in the Court, Sibal.
The Will that was spoken about by SG in the earlier hearing is in public domain. The attachment of properties is known. They cannot just make statements like this. ED's only case is that he is not cooperating. This is not fair, this is media trial, Sibal
SG has contended discovery of large number of mails, bank accounts, among other things. All this was never out to Chidambaram. He was examined by ED thrice and only once by the CBI. Neither agencies put any of this before him.
They have to clarify when these documents and notes were discovered. If it was before questioning, why didn't they confront him and if it was after questioning, then why was he not called again, Sibal
SG says Chidambaram is being evasive but the Court should peruse the questions that were put to him and the responses given by him to ascertain if he was being evasive.
The case is that Karti Chidambaram used his relationship with P Chidambaram to influence public servants to secure ex-post facto FIPB approvals for the downstream investment in INX media, Sibal
The CA Bhaskar Raman got bail, Karti Chidambaram got bail, Indrani and Peter Mukherjea are on default bail and no sanctions have been sought for the six government secretaries till now, Sibal
P Chidambaram is being made vicariously liable. The ED's case seems to be that since he's Karti's father, he must be involved... There is no chargesheet filed naming him so prima facie no offence has been committed, Sibal.
Sibal cites the judgment of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh on the issue of right of an accused for anticipatory bail.
If there is a money trail, there must be documents and the source of the monies traceable. What are they trying to find out? First probe, find out and then seek custody, Sibal
If something is found after probing documents, it should be put before the accused for him to give an explanation. Here it's a one way street where documents are produced in Court but not put before accused, Sibal
Great ignominy and humiliation is attached to an arrest. The moment someone is arrested, you destroy that man. You make believe that the man js guilty. That is what is happening here, Sibal
On the Delhi High Court, Sibal says what is the application of mind of the Judge when certain paragraphs are a word for word, comma for comma copy of the note submitted by the SG?
That is exactly my objection that while he (SG) can put whatever he wishes before the Court but it should be put before me first. These are the procedural issues that need to be addressed in a case which involves personal liberty, Sibal
There is also another serious issue that why was the order reserved for seven month? It took him (Justice Sunil Gaur of the HC) 7 months to decide that there was gravity in the matter, Sibal
Their case is, and it is mentioned in the judgment, that Chidambaram has been evasive during questioning, then Your Lordships must ask for transcripts and decide if he was being evasive, Sibal
They (investigating agencies) are saying that they have cogent evidence against the petitioner and at the same time they say that evidence is yet to be unearthed. Then what is this cogent evidence then? - Sibal
They are claiming that there is apprehension of tampering of evidence. Tampering of what? Properties situated outside? Or bank accounts? If that tampering is possible, my arms must be really long, Sibal
Supreme Court to continue hearing the case tomorrow at 12 noon. P Chidambaram to file a rejoinder to the ED's affidavit. Interim protection from arrest granted to Chidambaram in the ED case to continue till tomorrow.
#SupremeCourt hears the fire crackers issue concerning Delhi air pollution
CJI BR Gavai: Whether the pollution in 2018 (AQI) was much less as compared to 2024?
Respondent: If you see CAQM Data..
SG Tushar Mehta: In Covid period it came down ..else it remained the same. There is nothing on record to show that it is because of the firecrackers. I urge that there is no restriction for firecrackers. If there is a two hour timing .... One hour goes in persuading parents only ! We all were children!
Sr Adv K Parameshwar: Half of haryana is under the ban without even being heard. That is how NCR expanse is..
Respondent: Please see the chemical composition..how can we ensure that this 50 percent composition ladden crackers are there in the market?
Sr Adv Parameshwar for the manufacturers: we are saying we will only distribute it to wholesalers from designated 25 to 30 points. And then the check becomes more effective.. our children also staying here.. if it goes bad.. next year also ban can be there
Supreme Court to shortly hear Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam’s plea challenging Madras High Court order directing SIT probe into Karur rally stampede that claimed 41 lives.
Bench: Justices JK Maheshwari and NV Anjaria
#SupremeCourtofIndia #KarurStampede
The plea seeks stay on the Madras High Court order, appointment of a former Supreme Court judge to oversee the probe, and expunging of adverse remarks against the party and its leaders.
#KarurStampede
Sr. Adv. Gopal Subramanium (for TVK): the petition filed before the HC was for a very limited purpose. That the govt should be directed to frame a protocol for road shows. The AAG appears on behalf of the state. In the order various allegations have been made. Adverse inferences are drawn against a person without being a party…. Please see the various averments…
Sabarimala gold loss case: Kerala High Court suo motu impleads State Police Chief in case concerning loss of gold from the gold plated covering the dwarapalaka idols at Sabarimala temple.
Bench of Justices Raja Vijayaraghavan V and KV Jayakumar made it clear today that the SIT is to refrain from speaking to the media until the probe is completed. SIT to file reports every two weeks before the Court in sealed cover.
HC orders State Police Chief to direct ADGP Venkatesh, who is also the SIT head, to register a crime and carry out the investigation in accordance with law.
Supreme Court hears applications seeking review of its Vanashakti judgement.
In the judgement, the Court had barred the Central government from granting retrospective environmental clearance.
Bench: CJI BR Gavai, Justices K Vinod Chandran and Ujjal Bhuyan
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal: the OM refers to 2 powers. It was passed in pursuance of the order of the NGT. There is apparently an error.
Sibal: all disputes with respect to violations can be dealt by the tribunal. None of this was pointed out to the bench.
CJI: it appears from the NGT order that despite violation the violators continued with impunity. That’s why these directions were there.
Sibal: they said it projects are permissible then only it will be done. If they are impermissible there will be demolition. many of these projects were permissible ones. Like the airport. Central government passed the OM in pursuance to the NGT order.
Supreme Court hears plea seeking probe into alleged financial irregularities and fund diversion by Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd and its promoters.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and NK Singh
#SupremeCourt #Indiabulls
Adv Prashant Bhushan (appearing in person)
Sr. Adv. Harish Salve (for Sameer Gehlaut, founder and chairman of India Bulls): this is such blackmail litigation. If an investigation is needed it is into these NGOs. All the agencies have filed affidavits and nothing has come out. What is this kind of witch hunting. Who is this stranger. I am objecting the maintainability of this petition.
Justice Kant: CBI says ED may continue investigation into IHFL’s affairs. We want to know what is the ED’s stand on it. We will hear you on maintaining Mr. Salve. Don’t worry.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls, which was conducted ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections #BiharSIR #SupremeCourt
Bench to assemble shortly. Hearing will start at 2pm.
Adv Prashant Bhushan: after the final roll has come out we have been able to do some analysis. We have been able to access the 2003 guidelines for SIR. And another 2016 guideline where they said how to remove bogus voters etc. we have prepared written submissions.