Abhishek Manu Singhvi argues that the SC on August 21 had ordered for a hearing on Friday, August 23. Prosecution should not have acted in a way (by arresting Chidambaram on August 21) to render a judicial order ineffective.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in the Court when an order for hearing was passed. His client (CBI) should not have acted in this way then, Singhvi.
#Breaking: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Chidambaram against Delhi High Court order denying him protection from arrest as far as CBI case is concerned. Court says matter is now infructuous.
Chidambaram granted liberty to move appropriate Court for regular bail
Supreme Court now hears the SLP filed in relation to the cases filed by ED against P Chidambaram.
Sibal questions the handing over of certain documents in a sealed cover to the Delhi High Court. He says that P Chidambaram was not aware of these documents/notes.
If they discovered some material between the time FIR was filed and I was arrested, they should have summoned me and interrogated me. They cannot spring it like a surprise in the Court, Sibal.
The Will that was spoken about by SG in the earlier hearing is in public domain. The attachment of properties is known. They cannot just make statements like this. ED's only case is that he is not cooperating. This is not fair, this is media trial, Sibal
SG has contended discovery of large number of mails, bank accounts, among other things. All this was never out to Chidambaram. He was examined by ED thrice and only once by the CBI. Neither agencies put any of this before him.
They have to clarify when these documents and notes were discovered. If it was before questioning, why didn't they confront him and if it was after questioning, then why was he not called again, Sibal
SG says Chidambaram is being evasive but the Court should peruse the questions that were put to him and the responses given by him to ascertain if he was being evasive.
The case is that Karti Chidambaram used his relationship with P Chidambaram to influence public servants to secure ex-post facto FIPB approvals for the downstream investment in INX media, Sibal
The CA Bhaskar Raman got bail, Karti Chidambaram got bail, Indrani and Peter Mukherjea are on default bail and no sanctions have been sought for the six government secretaries till now, Sibal
P Chidambaram is being made vicariously liable. The ED's case seems to be that since he's Karti's father, he must be involved... There is no chargesheet filed naming him so prima facie no offence has been committed, Sibal.
Sibal cites the judgment of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh on the issue of right of an accused for anticipatory bail.
If there is a money trail, there must be documents and the source of the monies traceable. What are they trying to find out? First probe, find out and then seek custody, Sibal
If something is found after probing documents, it should be put before the accused for him to give an explanation. Here it's a one way street where documents are produced in Court but not put before accused, Sibal
Great ignominy and humiliation is attached to an arrest. The moment someone is arrested, you destroy that man. You make believe that the man js guilty. That is what is happening here, Sibal
On the Delhi High Court, Sibal says what is the application of mind of the Judge when certain paragraphs are a word for word, comma for comma copy of the note submitted by the SG?
That is exactly my objection that while he (SG) can put whatever he wishes before the Court but it should be put before me first. These are the procedural issues that need to be addressed in a case which involves personal liberty, Sibal
There is also another serious issue that why was the order reserved for seven month? It took him (Justice Sunil Gaur of the HC) 7 months to decide that there was gravity in the matter, Sibal
Their case is, and it is mentioned in the judgment, that Chidambaram has been evasive during questioning, then Your Lordships must ask for transcripts and decide if he was being evasive, Sibal
They (investigating agencies) are saying that they have cogent evidence against the petitioner and at the same time they say that evidence is yet to be unearthed. Then what is this cogent evidence then? - Sibal
They are claiming that there is apprehension of tampering of evidence. Tampering of what? Properties situated outside? Or bank accounts? If that tampering is possible, my arms must be really long, Sibal
Supreme Court to continue hearing the case tomorrow at 12 noon. P Chidambaram to file a rejoinder to the ED's affidavit. Interim protection from arrest granted to Chidambaram in the ED case to continue till tomorrow.
Adv Prashant Bhushan: Authorities are randomly picking up Bengali Muslims claiming them to be Bangladeshis and when it is verified it is seen they are Indians. Some were deported and then it was verified and then taken back.
Justice Kant: But they were owned by the state and state said they belong to the state.
Bhushan: Here Delhi police says documents are in Bangladeshi language. What is that? It is Bangla. So what ?
Justice Kant: suppose someone comes to Delhi... And has document in Bangla. Suppose now it has to be verified..
Bhushan: But how can they be detained. Let them verify.
#SupremeCourt
Justice Joymalya Bagchi: on migrant labours isn't there a system in place to check the place of origin of such workers and the verify the same
Justice Kant: a nodal agency is needed to coordinate between state of origin and the state where they are earning livelihood.
Bhushan: But what they are doing is detaining the persons when being verified.. this is panic among bengali Muslims
Justice Bagchi: this is a serious issue of mass migration. Here the workers are from eastern part coming to North and work. The nodal agency can coordinate .
Bhushan: some are even being tortured in such detention centres. Even foreigners act does not give authority for this even if someone is termed a foreigner.
Justice Kant: Issue notice
Bhushan: In the meantime please say that in case verifying
It is fine but no detention
Justice Kant: We cannot overlook ground realities...Suppose someone is Infiltrator and he enters illegally. How to deal with that situation. If you don't detain..the writing on the wall is that they will disappear. Yes some mechanism needs to be there. .. may be some card from place of origin and authorities from other state can accept the bona fide
.
Supreme Court hears a plea filed by the Governor of Kerala, in his capacity as Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, challenging a High Court judgment that upheld the State govGovernor–State standoff
Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
Yesterday, Supreme Court said it would constitute a search committee to shortlist candidates for the post of Vice-Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and Digital University.
The Bench suggested both sides propose 4 names each after which it shall form the search committee to decide full-time VC appointments as a measure to end the current impasset’s power to recommend temporary VCs.
Supreme Court to shortly pronounce its judgment on a plea filed by the Karnataka government challenging the High Court order granting bail to Kannada film actor Darshan in the Renukaswamy murder case.
#Darshan #Renukaswamymurdercase #Bail #SupremeCourt
A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan will pronounce the order.
Supreme Court to shortly resume hearing petitions raising objections to the SIR exercise ahead of the upcoming assembly elections in Bihar #BiharSIR2025 #BiharElections @ECISVEEP #SupremeCourt
The petitioners and intervenors are expected to wrap up submissions this morning. Election commission of india to begin it's reply today.
@ECISVEEP #SupremeCourt
@ECISVEEP The Supreme Court on Wednesday had remarked that the fact that the Election Commission of India (ECI) had increased the number of documents for proof of citizenship made the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) more voter-friendly #SupremeCourt #BiharSIR2025
A 3-judge bench of the #SupremeCourt to hear case shortly
The bench is slated to hear petitions seeking stay of the suo motu order passed by Justice JB Pardiwala led bench directing no free roaming strays in NCR
#straydogs
Three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprises of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria.
The matter is titled In Re: “City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price” #straydogs
On August 11 Supreme court had directed for the removal of all stray dogs from streets and public spaces in Delhi, NOIDA, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad, their relocation to shelters, and a complete prohibition on releasing them back