Abhishek Manu Singhvi argues that the SC on August 21 had ordered for a hearing on Friday, August 23. Prosecution should not have acted in a way (by arresting Chidambaram on August 21) to render a judicial order ineffective.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in the Court when an order for hearing was passed. His client (CBI) should not have acted in this way then, Singhvi.
#Breaking: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Chidambaram against Delhi High Court order denying him protection from arrest as far as CBI case is concerned. Court says matter is now infructuous.
Chidambaram granted liberty to move appropriate Court for regular bail
Supreme Court now hears the SLP filed in relation to the cases filed by ED against P Chidambaram.
Sibal questions the handing over of certain documents in a sealed cover to the Delhi High Court. He says that P Chidambaram was not aware of these documents/notes.
If they discovered some material between the time FIR was filed and I was arrested, they should have summoned me and interrogated me. They cannot spring it like a surprise in the Court, Sibal.
The Will that was spoken about by SG in the earlier hearing is in public domain. The attachment of properties is known. They cannot just make statements like this. ED's only case is that he is not cooperating. This is not fair, this is media trial, Sibal
SG has contended discovery of large number of mails, bank accounts, among other things. All this was never out to Chidambaram. He was examined by ED thrice and only once by the CBI. Neither agencies put any of this before him.
They have to clarify when these documents and notes were discovered. If it was before questioning, why didn't they confront him and if it was after questioning, then why was he not called again, Sibal
SG says Chidambaram is being evasive but the Court should peruse the questions that were put to him and the responses given by him to ascertain if he was being evasive.
The case is that Karti Chidambaram used his relationship with P Chidambaram to influence public servants to secure ex-post facto FIPB approvals for the downstream investment in INX media, Sibal
The CA Bhaskar Raman got bail, Karti Chidambaram got bail, Indrani and Peter Mukherjea are on default bail and no sanctions have been sought for the six government secretaries till now, Sibal
P Chidambaram is being made vicariously liable. The ED's case seems to be that since he's Karti's father, he must be involved... There is no chargesheet filed naming him so prima facie no offence has been committed, Sibal.
Sibal cites the judgment of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh on the issue of right of an accused for anticipatory bail.
If there is a money trail, there must be documents and the source of the monies traceable. What are they trying to find out? First probe, find out and then seek custody, Sibal
If something is found after probing documents, it should be put before the accused for him to give an explanation. Here it's a one way street where documents are produced in Court but not put before accused, Sibal
Great ignominy and humiliation is attached to an arrest. The moment someone is arrested, you destroy that man. You make believe that the man js guilty. That is what is happening here, Sibal
On the Delhi High Court, Sibal says what is the application of mind of the Judge when certain paragraphs are a word for word, comma for comma copy of the note submitted by the SG?
That is exactly my objection that while he (SG) can put whatever he wishes before the Court but it should be put before me first. These are the procedural issues that need to be addressed in a case which involves personal liberty, Sibal
There is also another serious issue that why was the order reserved for seven month? It took him (Justice Sunil Gaur of the HC) 7 months to decide that there was gravity in the matter, Sibal
Their case is, and it is mentioned in the judgment, that Chidambaram has been evasive during questioning, then Your Lordships must ask for transcripts and decide if he was being evasive, Sibal
They (investigating agencies) are saying that they have cogent evidence against the petitioner and at the same time they say that evidence is yet to be unearthed. Then what is this cogent evidence then? - Sibal
They are claiming that there is apprehension of tampering of evidence. Tampering of what? Properties situated outside? Or bank accounts? If that tampering is possible, my arms must be really long, Sibal
Supreme Court to continue hearing the case tomorrow at 12 noon. P Chidambaram to file a rejoinder to the ED's affidavit. Interim protection from arrest granted to Chidambaram in the ED case to continue till tomorrow.
Supreme Court bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi to hear it's suo motu case on Odisha High Court bail order which had a condition for cleaning police stations
#SupremeCourt
Adv for the state: Learned Advocate General of Odisha is logged in
CJI: Okay Dr Acharya.
CJI: unfortunately the HC as well as some district courts while granting bail in odisha is imposing conditions which is obnoxious and bringing a bad name to the image of judiciary.
CJI; we do not expect the judiciary to act and behave in 2026. We spent 76 years for the liberty and this is how are repaying !
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: With profound pain we have to mention this curative. This curative is from AIIMS. Termination of pregnancy is not possible. It will be a live baby with severe deformities. Minor mother will have life long health issues and cannot reproduce. I am sorry I am not composed..
CJI Surya Kant: if the mother does not have permanent disability then it should be carried out. This is a case of child rape. Victim will have lifelong scar and trauma. This is foetus vs child fight.
ASG: this is not foetus vs child fight. This is in best interest of child. Minor mother will have life long health issues.
CJI: Even if she has complicated marital life later..is this pain more or that one.
ASG: this child can be given for adoption. It has been 30 weeks now..it is a viable life now.
CJI: the first judgment of this country on this was delivered by me. If supreme court had not stayed it..it would have been law now. Justice Augustine Masih was on bench with me then. Later SC reversed its own ruling. There are children for adoption. In this country we have lot of sympathies... There are deserted, abandoned children on the streets and even mafias on it. We have to look at them. This is an unwanted pregnancy of a 15 year old child.
CJI: This is a curative. Unwanted pregnancy cannot be thrusted on a person. Imagine she is a child. She should be studying now. But we want to make her a mother. Imagine the pain, the humiliation the child has suffered in this.
ASG: just four more weeks.. it will be better for the child mother.
CJI: my sister must have seen all this
Premature delivery and foeticide are the two things which has to be done now..it's injecting the foetal heart: ASG
#BREAKING Plea in Calcutta High Court challenges ECI decision to deploy only employees of Central government and PSUs as counting supervisors.
Senior Advocate Kalyan Bandopadhyay mentioned the matter. To be heard at 2 PM.
Hearing is ongoing before Justice Krishna Rao
Senior Advocate Kalyan Bandopadhyay, representing Trinamool Congress, said the Chief Electoral Officer had no jurisdiction to pass such order.
"Why are you [ECI] insisting on central government employees who are not involved in the process... is it for particular one party. Why did you [ECI] not disclose," Bandopadhyay said.
Supreme Court nine-judge bench to resume hearing submissions around key issues regarding religious freedom (Articles 25/26), judicial review of faith-based customs, and the 2018 Sabarimala verdict
#Sabarimala #SupremeCourt
Adv Nizam Pasha begins submissions
Adv Pasha: The reason we were constrained to file this intervention application is because a writ petition came to be filed before the Delhi High Court following the Sabarimala judgment. The petitioner, a law student who had come to Delhi for an internship, visited the Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah and was stopped from entering the sanctum sanctorum, the small enclosure where the grave is housed. She claimed that this was a violation of her rights as declared in Sabarimala.
The relief sought before the High Court was a declaration that the practice of prohibiting women from entering the sanctum sanctorum of the Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah is illegal and unconstitutional.
This raises the issue which has been troubling the Court, namely whether a complete third party, a non believer, can enter a place of worship and demand that matters of faith must yield to their individual claims. This is a stark example of such a situation.
Suo Motu: Brutal Assault on a member of the legal frraternity and need for judicial intervention
Adv: A lady lawyer was attacked. She was brutally stabbed in the office of her husband. She went somehow made PCR calls and the. Hospitals refused to take her in.
CJI Surya Kant: As soon as I got your letter yesterday I registered the suo motu
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: The accused was arrested. The FIR is under section 109(1) BNSS. AIIMS has been treating her. She has been discharged and now in private hospital
CJI: why did hospital denied emergency treatment?
CJI: A letter was received by the office of the CJI. The letter sought urgent intervention in the case of brutal assault of a woman advocate . The photos depicted brutal assault by a sharp edged weapon on the lady lawyer which led to injury in all vital organs of the body. She was stated to be under treatment at AIIMS trauma centre. ASG is present on behalf of NCT Delhi. The investigating officer is also present.
CJI: Husband of the victim is the prime accused and assaulted. There are complaints against in laws who are absconding. It is noted that victim has three minor daughters aged 12,4 and 1 years. The girl child was abandoned by the father. Now they are under care of maternal grandparents.
Delhi High Court directs counsels representing Delhi University, Delhi Police, Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) President Aryaan Maan and other contesting candidates who allegedly violated court orders, Lyngdoh Committee recommendations and guidelines framed for conducting DUSU Elections, to be present before court on next date of hearing.
The matter was listed before Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia.
Court - Where is the university counsel? Where are the students?
Counsel appearing on behalf of Central Government Standing Counsel (CGSC) representing Union of India and Delhi Police stated that his senior is not available.