The #NavyHill#RVA downtown development plan includes hundreds of pages in two binders. Why so much paper? I took a look. #Thread 1/
The proposal from @LevarStoney 's office includes NINE proposed ordinances (city laws) and one resolution. The resolution is about any future surplus $$. It's non-binding - basically a political statement, not a law, so I will ignore for now. What's in the 9 ordinances? 2/
The first four ordinances (in my count - they're in no particular order) set up the mechanics of the deal - funding, land ownership, and specific actions for the city and developer. 3/
(Ord1) The most important ordinance commits the city to the development agreement - a separate contract that lays out most of the deal’s specifics – what the developer and city each promise to do. 4/
(Ord2) Almost equal importance: an ordinance that creates the special city reserve fund where all the #TIF money will go. (TIF uses future tax revenue from the project to pay back arena loan) 5/
(Ord3-4) Two of the ordinances move land ownership around. One transfers some city-owned land to Richmond’s Economic Development Authority; the other transfers land from EDA to the developers (price is laid out in development agreement) 6/
The other five ordinances modify city rules and regulations to help the developers get the project done (typical in any development project, altho' scope/scale of changes here are much bigger) 7/
(Ord5-6) One ordinance reconfigures “rights of way;” basically, it closes streets and sidewalks for construction and (eventually) pedestrian plazas/public space. An “encroachment” ordinance gives the developers the right to use the closed off spaces for construction. 8/
The final three ordinances make changes to the city’s #zoning regulations (FYI, zoning rules limit what can be built where in a city; this is why you can’t build a Home Depot in the middle of a residential neighborhood) 9/
(Ord7) Biggest zoning ordinance updates city code for Coliseum district, including allowable retail stores, signage, parking, etc. This basically rewrites city’s zoning rules for this area to match the project 10/
(Ord8-9) Second zoning ordinance expands Coliseum district (currently just arena block) to include surrounding blocks. Third ordinance zones some streets as “priority” or “street-oriented commercial” to match their new purpose 11/
Bottom line: all 9 ordinances work together for #NavyHill plan; Council will most likely pass all or none. BUT doesn't mean they are set in stone - Council can negotiate changes with developers. Still, any big changes likely to be to development agreement, not ordinances 12/
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…